[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 514 KB, 1200x1628, nietzsche.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15918360 No.15918360 [Reply] [Original]

There are no good refutations of this guy.

>> No.15918362

He was refuted by a horse.

>> No.15918371

>>15918360
How hard can it be to refute helpless sentimentalism?

>> No.15918374

His views are true but ultimately autistic. Sometimes I just want to have a casual conversation without it having to be a will to power thing.

>> No.15918375

Obviously.
There is a reason that every single attempted "critique" of him can be summed up as 'he was incel beep boop'

>> No.15918383

>>15918360
Here's my refutation of this guy. He was an autist, an incel, and a giant faggot. Just like you, OP. Also, he has a goofy mustache.

>> No.15918384

>>15918362
>>15918371
>>15918374
it's really embarrassing watching people try to be clever when they argue against nietzsche. it never works.

>> No.15918391

how would you know a good refutation of him when you havent even read his work, just seen YouTube videos and read summaries?

>> No.15918397

>>15918384
What's even more embarassing is seeing teenage boys cream their pants about the only philosopher they've heard about

>> No.15918401

>>15918391
>>15918384

>> No.15918408

>>15918397
>can't even spell embarrassing
>tries to mock people for what they have and haven't read

oooooo that's going to be a cringe from me dawg

>> No.15918417
File: 33 KB, 500x483, 1594668600662.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15918417

>>15918408
I'm ESL

>> No.15918441

>>15918375
The best thing is in Nietzsche's philosophy there is no distinction between philosophy and mere sophistry/rhetoric so in his own system we win by labeling him an incel

>> No.15918471

>>15918441
Not really, if you understand his views by more than what you learned from youtube.

You think it's similar to what Nietzsche does, but it's not. Nietzsche's quips usually have layers of subtext to them that actually make them interesting, just screaming incel is what a dunce would do.

>> No.15918513

>>15918471
>but it's not
What is he doing then?

>> No.15918524
File: 652 KB, 3500x1150, wagnuh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15918524

>>15918360
>There are no good refutations of this guy.

>> No.15918548

>>15918513
Finish reading my post.

>> No.15918823

>>15918360
There are no arguments to refute

>> No.15918967

>>15918823
Implying you need to mimic the monkeys squabbling in the corner

>> No.15918973

>>15918362
haha extremely funny and clever! wow bro!

>> No.15918991

>>15918360
He never made any falsifiable assertions. Just vague ranting and some verses of poetry.

>> No.15919092

>>15918360
OP is correct
Comprehension must always precede refutation
Comprehending Nietzsche renders refutation obsolete
QED

>> No.15919109

>>15918360
only jesus can refute him.

>> No.15919114

>>15918991
>He never made any falsifiable assertions.

Falsifiability is not falsifiable, so it's a bad criteria.

>> No.15919125

>>15919114
You can't refute that which is unfalsifiable, brainlet.

>> No.15919274

>>15919125
Falsifiability has nothing to do with truth. It's irrelevant.

>> No.15919283

>>15918360
He sharted his pants constantly. That renders anything he said invalid.

>> No.15919290
File: 77 KB, 545x512, macintyre-alasdair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15919290

>>15918360

>> No.15919311

>>15918374
>Didn't understand shit about what the will to power means

>> No.15919879

>>15918973
>>15918384
seethe, seethe just like neetzche when we saw a heckin horserino get beaten

>> No.15919897
File: 27 KB, 400x400, wojaksoyangry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15919897

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT THE HECKIN HORSERINO!!!!! NOT THE CLIPCLOPPERINO!!!!! YOU'RE NOT ALLOUD TO BEAT THE CUTE GOOD BOI HORSEY!!!!

>AAAAAAH IM HAVING AN AUTISTIC MELTDOWN!!!! IM DIEING!!!!

why do people worship this guy?

>> No.15920417

>>15919290
Literally who?

>> No.15920598

>>15918360
Of course there aren't. He actually started with the Greeks. You can't refute someone who actually starts with the Greeks.

>> No.15920689

>>15920598
What if someone else started with the Greeks?

>> No.15920702

>>15920689
Then they would agree with him.

>> No.15920719

Am I going crazy or something? He backs up NOTHING he says, its like "refuting" poetry. Hes more like jesus or a prophet, he just says emotionally resonant things that arent really based on argumentation. Am I going nuts? Why do people act like hes some lord of logic?

>> No.15920729

>>15920719
What have you read by him?

>> No.15920762

>>15920729
antichrist
beyond good and evil
geneology of morals

>> No.15920843

>>15920762
Okay. It makes sense why you think that, then.

Nietzsche's books from Zarathustra and onward are really part of a political mission that Nietzsche set himself on. You can relate those books to Plato's Republic in that the purpose of them is to provide teaching materials to his "free spirits" so they could go out and build his vision of a new state. As a result, he was far less concerned with "proving" himself and far more concerned with providing references for which his recruits could quickly use in order to combat any opponents. If you read his earlier works, especially everything from The Birth of Tragedy and earlier, you'll find a lot of his research there. Nietzsche's writing career is broken up into stages similar to his metamorphoses, with the final stage, the child, coming posthumously through his "future philosophers."