/lit/ - Literature

>>15880485
Yeah bro fuck philosophy, science is so awesome bro!!!!! Did you know there's a trillion starts??? So epic

>>15880485
Onions wojacks are suddenly extremely repulsive and disgusting to me. Everyone better stop using it or else

>>15880485
Kek and accurate

>>15880485
Nobody says this

>>15880485
this picture tells me you are millennial degenerate.

Psychology has produced maybe a handful of actually important authors. I think it will never make the jump into respected subject that it so wishes.

>>15880499
>The capacity for action, at least in the sense of the releasing of processes, is still with us, although it has become the exclusive prerogative of the scientists, who have enlarged the realm of human affairs to the point of extinguishing the time-honored protective dividing line between nature and the human world. In view of such achievements, performed for centuries in the unseen quiet of the laboratories, it seems only proper that their deeds should eventually have turned out to have greater news value, to be of greater political significance, than the administrative and diplomatic doings if most so-called statesmen.

>But the action of scientists, since it acts into the web of human relationships, lacks the revelatory character of action as well as the ability to produce stories and become historical, which together forms the very source from which meaningfulness springs into and illuminates human existence.

>>15880485
Classic display of displaced anger Anon.

Tell me about your mother.

>>15880499
>black and white man good
>colored man bad

>>15880485
This represents literally no one.

>>15880499
Contrasting actually significant scientists against pop culture "scientists", some of which don't even have a science degree... I couldn't imagine that a historically significant scientific mind would overshadow that of a showman! The most obvious conclusion is that Germans are superior, despite the fact that there were no real American scientists presented.

>>15880751
yo das racist

>>15880600
>>15880762
Do you even go outside?

>>15880845
I have not met a single person who studies psychology or sociology who doesn’t also read and value philosophy. Not the case with Hardline STEMfags, but everyone I know In the social sciences has at least a rudimentary understanding of philosophy. You are either a young undergrad or you haven’t met people who are very knowledgeable in their field.

>>15880870
>in their field
What makes you think OPs criticism is constrained only to academics?

>>15880669

Philosophy has been discussed for thousands of years; competent physics for maybe five or six hundred. Psychology is a relative baby to these fields and has made excellent progress, but of course there's a lot left to do. I'm hopeful.