[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 77 KB, 812x550, 5e3ecde5df2f666d333ab533.jfif.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15831239 No.15831239 [Reply] [Original]

Why do people misunderstand his ideas so much? And this is including his admirers.

>> No.15831252

>>15831239
because he's a genius

>> No.15831260

Other than his anti tranny speech I never understood how he became so controversial.
>women wear makeup to look more attractive
AHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT SAY THAT

>> No.15831284

never read anything he's ever written. maybe he has a bad writing style

>> No.15831294

>>15831260
I watched that video and it is an incredibly stupid statement. He made the point that women do makeup to impress men.
If you look at the image of Peterson in the OP, you can see his hair is nicely brushed. Did he do that to impress women?
It's about making oneself appear presentable.
He is not misunderstood, he just has stupid ideas sometimes.

>> No.15831301

>>15831284
I read his 12 Rules for Life.
Not really that helpful, but the most well-written book I've ever read.

>> No.15831310

>>15831284
his prose is angelic

>> No.15831376
File: 51 KB, 976x549, _88634010_moot_getty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15831376

>>15831310

>> No.15831398

I’m just here to see if anyone has that recording of the JP text to speech where he talks about shapiros sisters jiggling milkers

>>15831310
except this nigga straight lying; peterson uses unironic smileys in his writing in 12 rules

>> No.15831477

>>15831239
Peterson's ideas are so generic, they can be strictly interpreted to mean almost anything.

>> No.15831513
File: 44 KB, 600x706, WAKE ME UP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15831513

>>15831294
ABSOLUTES
I HATE ABSOLUTES SO MUCH
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD

>> No.15831554

>>15831239
Hes great. People that hate on him are uncouth mongoloids.

>> No.15831568

>>15831239
Because he's a poor communicator.

>> No.15831575

>>15831376
Why post a random person?

>> No.15831720

>>15831310
When he’s talking about the lobsters he makes a pun about feeling “crabby” and proceeds to write haha :) in the text

>> No.15831731

>dwominance hierarchy
>Dostojevsky
>Raskolnikov

*roaring applause*

>> No.15832031

>>15831239
People "misunderstand" him because he is vague, a weasel, and a spineless coward.

He turbo fence-sits on any issue that might reduce his clout. Like the God thing for example, he simply refuses to answer whether he believes that God exists or not. This is because on one hand he doesn't want to alienate the (mostly-secular) young boys who follow him. But on the other hand he doesn't want to piss off the religions nuts who will cling to any public figure that somewhat identifies with their dying religion.

>>15831260
He didn't say "women wear makeup to look attractive". But since Peterson is such a weasel, I will refrain from calling you a retard just yet.

What he actually said was that makeup was "sexual signaling" and therefore, any women who uses makeup in the workplace is a hypocrite if she complains about being harassed by her co-workers.

This is fucking dumb. Makeup might have appeared to make women more sexually attractive to potential partners. But that doesn't mean that every time a women uses makeup she is secretly looking to get fucked. In the workplace women are socially expected to wear makeup.
Sex originally appeared to make babies, but 99% of sexual encounters don't happen with the purpose of making babies.

>> No.15832065

>>15831284
His prose is too nice for the genre he's writing in.

>> No.15832074

>>15832031
>What he actually said was that makeup was "sexual signaling" and therefore, any women who uses makeup in the workplace is a hypocrite if she complains about being harassed by her co-workers.
He didn't say this, but you're a seething roastie so I'm not going to argue with you.

>> No.15832077

>>15831731
>Solzhenitsin
.. I... I can't do it!

>> No.15832078

>>15831239
why are people still discussing this benzo addled degenerate?

>> No.15832082

how is this branded memester pseud so silent of blm just as used to its like he was at the starting blocks of what'd happen isn't that hypocritical

>> No.15832218

Maps of Meaning... I've had psychotic breakdowns that made more sense

>> No.15832697
File: 80 KB, 800x799, death euphoria.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15832697

he has no sense of humour, if he did he might not of needed to slam ssris and benzos his whole career which would of made his overall message of get your shit together a lot more palatable. He cant hide his narcissim well enough either, you can just imagine him relishing his own farts in a state of grim euphoria while being uttterly incapable of finding anything funny about it, more just aggresive shame

he still has some good things to say and has introduced a lot of people to dosto and jung, though at the expense of making a lot of psueds violently anti all post modern thought which is a shame, whats more of a shame is the distinct lack of capable speakers addressing the insanity of academia


>>15832031
makeup is a sexual signal thats why it mimics what the face does when aroused this can be misinterpreted and therefore should be included in the converstaion of sexual harrassment as should everything men and women do to communicate sexually, thats not condoning anything nor should it be controversial

>> No.15833026

people misunderstand him because his entire body of work is a misunderstanding of jung

>> No.15833074

>>15833026
explain

>> No.15833087

>>15831239
His ideas are built upon total hypocrisy, contrarianism based on inconvenience, ridiculousness, and making more money through exposure of retardation.

>> No.15833094

>>15831239
wash your penis

>> No.15833112

>>15831294
But red lipstick and pnk blushed cheeks, high heels and short skirt is not required just to look presentable.

>> No.15833114

>>15833074
he takes archetypes to the extreme and doesn’t allow for any variation in interpretation or to consider for changing values in culture and society
just think about how strictly he treats gender roles and extrapolate from there
he’s just like “this is the archetype and it’s the way that people have to live and it’s what guides us as humans” when in actuality the archetypes are created by the human experience

>> No.15833225

>>15831260
he became a battleground for the culture wars. there is a strain within the dominant liberal consensus that treats any effort by men to improve themselves through discipline with mockery, hatred and fear. peterson was really catching the fallout from the heat PUAs brought down on themselves; their very existence touched an especially raw nerve if you can remember