/lit/ - Literature

>>15829833
please no

>>15829863
does "feminine (male)" and "females (males)" mean he's talking about trannies?

>>15829833
Has the last thread reached the bump limit?

>>15829863
> Even in females (males) such as myself, the cock and the balls have great appeal to me

Based?

Dumping

>>15829883
does critique of academia look like that? if so, then please give me the phenomenology of spirit, I want to drown in it

>>15829833
where can i read this?

>>15829883
>tfw my pic got saved
I did the.. you know.. red.. not the book part.. It was just from the Amazon preview/look inside if you want the original without my scribblings.

>>15829833
I feel bad for the author and the extent of his delusions.

>>15829833
>latest
>new
>Synthesis
>dialectic
"Everything is Contemplation"
-T. Plotinus 264 AD.

>>15829940
Is this ironic? Post the pyramids lmfao

>>15829978
>>15829833
Let's play Jeopardy.
The question is: What is 'Hyparxis'?

The author tried something and he wrote 400+ pages of incoherent ramblings and called a philosophical foundation for 'the right wing'.
This says a lot about our current society and the brain virus that is 'right wing'. I might be categorized as a feminine (male) postmodern establishment left thinker who is unable to conceptualize the spiritual plane which only masculine thinkers like the author of the book can, but I do think we need to cancel this guy and burn his books. The ideas of this books are essentially the foundation of a new white supremacy and I can see how this book ties in with the current intellectual undercurrent that expresses itself in Kanye West running for presidency.

>>15830002
>This says a lot about our current society and the brain virus that is 'right wing'.
No, it says very little and all that it says is about the author who's a retard. The fact that you'd extrapolate this any further also says you're a retard yourself.

>>15830002
>but I do think we need to cancel this guy and burn his books.
why?. you really think this?. you end up burning nietzsche books if you start with this kind of thinking.

>>15830019
>?.

I'm not even sure if this book was an intentional joke or not. Either way, it's hilarious.

>>15830006
>>15830019
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T EXTRAPOLATE, HE IS JUST RETARDED AND SO ARE YOU!
>WHY DO YOU WANT TO BURN HIS BOOKS, NOOO NOT THE INNOCENT BOOKIRINOS
seethe harder /pol/fags, I'm a trained neo postpostmodern marxist-lenninist-stallmaninst spookbuster and I'm here to enter your head and pay rent to live there.

@15830041
take your meds

>>15830041
Cringe

Belcea's "The Synthesis of the Objective and Subjective" will become mandatory reading for all aspiring /lit/ posters.

>>15830041
im from the ss because i ask you why do you want to burn books?.
i think the joke is pretty obvious. ok, burn the book of that delusional little guy. burn my computer if i read it too.

>>15829863
Did Tobias Funke write this?

>>15829863
OP used indented paragraphs in his masterpiece; please do not take cheap shots at OP just because you're jealous, incel.

>>15830095
Maeby.

>>15829924
What does SPAG mean?

>>15830126
Spelling, Punctuation, And Grammar. Means there's an error.

>>15830128
Makes sense.
The writing is terrible.

Has the author abandoned us?

>>15829833
I saw the grand unveiling post about this yesterday, didn't bother to check it out, and I feel completely justified in my decision. This is either the Moby Dick of shitposts or some delusional rambling. I truly can't tell. The grandiose title and cover art, the writing for the lay man, the self-referential writing, it all gives way to weird meditations on dickgirls in no time at all. Does the author really think that the average person thinks about dickgirls as a political archetype? I'm in absolute awe.

STOOOOOP /LIT/ WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE GOOD WRITERS AAAAAAAH

>>15830160
There's no "we" commie

So is this whole book is just the author redefining the concept of masculine and feminine and then analyzing the whole world and different disciplines through that lens?
How old is the author? My guess is early 20s, college dropout, frequents /pol/, sexually frustrated with incel tendecies.

>>15830187
>So is this whole book is just the author redefining the concept of masculine and feminine and then analyzing the whole world and different disciplines through that lens?
That's pretty based

>>15830187
>How old is the author? My guess is early 20s, college dropout, frequents /pol/, sexually frustrated with incel tendecies.
Claims to have 2 economics degrees and in their 30s. Claims is a key word to that tidbit.

>>15829833
>the future of modern

>>15830211
He claimed that but also couldn’t name a single economist he’d read. It may have been someone pretending to be OP but regardless retarded

>>15830268
post again with proper cropping

>>15830126
Short for spaghetti, keep some in your pockets for a snack.

I agree with the anon of the previous thread that the book should be renamed as 'The Zoomer Diaries', the current title sounds way too serious and really displays that the authors head is far into his own ass.
>THE SYNTHESIS OF THE OBJECTIVE AND THE SUBJECTIVE
Seriously? How does that title reflect what is written, OP takes himself way too seriously and actually thinks he accomplished a profound philosophical breakthrough while also admitting that he's completely ignorant in philosophy. Instead if OP was a bit more self conscious, renaming the book would actually redeem himself. I mean the book itself can be seen as a personal accomplishment for the author but the attitude the author has is just extremely laughable.

This had me dying of laughter

>>15830317
I can't tell whether that post is actually real :(

>>15829833
So judging from the first pages, this is just some pseud's diary?
Where is the philosophy?
It's literally "I did this, I did that, me, me, me, me, I play video games"
Fuck this bullshit.

>>15830332
It's obviously someone impersonating him

if nothing else, this is a study on the inherent schizophrenia of forcing people to have an opinion on everything, regardless of how informed they are on the topic

ultimately, a condemnation of individualism

>>15830002
or maybe its also part of a psyop to discredit the "right wing"

note: "right vs left" is theatre: not real politics; it is "showbiz politics". "real politics" are about money and control of information.

the hand is faster than the eye.

>>15830179
we are humans.
we like and hate each other.
we are reading a chan with bs for fun.
we are the audience and the stars.

not commie at all.

>>15830412
you go to college and universities for that single reason: to have access to things thst may help you become better at mental gymnastics, and hopefully crush those who abuse of bad logic and bs arguments (ie fallacies)

>>15830621
What are you talking about, while right-left is ultimately reductionist and fails to capture the nuance of certain political ideas, there clearly is a divide. On the left you've got people fighting for some radical economic reform, and on the right you've got reactionaries who suck billionaire dick cock. Also then you have retards that focus on identity politics and a whole bunch of sheep getting outraged about this and that dividing the working class.

>>15830669
i went to college so i can go to postgrad so i can stay in academia and never do real work in real work not to learn logic lol

>>15830279
You don't "read" economists.

>>15830669
on the other side, having a lot of bad education is worse than no education, but universities still offer "logic" as part of theor courses.

the trick is to be willing to become annoying as hell with every bs you begin to notice and expose why its bs.

thats the right way to do politics: disarm those who deceive.

>>15830690
no books about economy, history and theories?

>>15830702
If you study economics in uni, all you "read" is textbooks and academic papers. Now how many authors of textbooks and papers can you remember? The vast majority of students don't even buy the textbooks, they just read summaries or lecture notes. Do people on /lit/ think econ students spend their time reading Adam Smith and Keynes?

>>15830674
theres a divide but its as artifitial and scripted as everything related to that "paradigm". the division is part of the drama, and a way to build tension.

dont focus in the "hands": focus in those who moves them. "follow the money": both right and left politicians usually retire to work for the same corporations and universities. the conflict is expected and part of the design.

>>15830742
Stop posting brainlet

>>15830684
the original purpose of universities vs what common people with normalized interests do, and why most universities are becoming rotten under the influence of ideologies and agendas to prevent people thinking and acting smart.

the less people challenge universities with logic and facts, the worse anything related to education will become, including quality of life.

you know the concept of "useful idiot", right? thats how the system builds conformist drones. thats what we should be, according to

>>15830386
Fucking kek

>>15830784
universities have always been only loosely related to education stop being a faggot

>>15830719
few people will care, most wont.

thats normal:
you want workers, not thinkers. thinkers may challenge authority and some will try to push new designs with less flaws (= less conflicts) you need to keep people busy and docile.

each change in the system corresponds to changes in technology. forcing simplistic views slows down evolution and the possibility of "unexpected mutations" (ie revolutions and similar bs).

>>15830770
try an actual argument.

>>15829940
Repeatedly spelt extraverted thinking wrong
Did this actually get published?

>>15830834
>extraverted
Anon, give that word a quick google for me.

It was self published, so not really published.

>>15830811
maybe you should read a bit about universities in india, and the first ones in europe after middle ages.

they were made to help people with money to preserve that money, and innovate when possible: thats education before the industrial rev, socialism and communism. if a machine can replace a worker and do more, you can expect a lot of angry people.

If the author is a narcissist, won't ridiculing him hurt him a lot? This must be hard. Maybe he should have bundled it with a murder-spree-suicide like the others of his kind.

"brings a fresh, personal perspective to tackle every conceivable topic"

Surprised it's not longer than 420 pages desu

Where's the pdf link? I'm not going to pay for this without reading it first

As soon as one of you slugs tries something he gets dragged through the mud. Bucket crab cunts.

>>15831609
Hi Horia, just post the pdf link already. If you really believed in your ideas you would share them with us for free, seeing as we meant so much to your development. Besides, if they really are important and groundbreaking ideas, getting them into the hands of as many people as possible should be your goal. Somehow, though, I have a feeling that this is more of a narcissist project you're just looking for ass pats for.

>>15831609
Sometimes bucket crap mentality is legit like when some rapper from your city finally goes national but he's wack

>>15831653
gay zoomer

>>15831664
It isn't, it's just being vindictive and cruel, I don't like shitting on people who tried, especially when most of you can't do better.

>>15831669
>most of you can't do better.

dude, did u see the sample? it's legit terrible.

>>15831680
Again, I promise most of you can't do better.

>>15831683
Not writing anything is already much better

>>15831683
That doesn't justify your narcissistic behaviour even if it were true.

>>15831702
self-publishing an absolutely terrible "philosophy" screed on Amazon could be the most narcissistic thing possible

>>15831669
>people who brag being ignorant but at the same time think they are above humanity and write groundbreaking manuals to construct a better society
>people who try
choose one and only one.
Horia is a full blown idiot, an absolute /pol/tard. and this is /lit/. if anything, /lit/ is at least true to itself. Horia is every Dostoevsky main character from Crime And Punishment, Underground, and Crocodile combined. telling him how lost he is, is the best fucking thing that can happen to him right now.

>>15831730
this is the exact kind of rhetoric I've seen in kiwi farm threads. kiwi spitball culture needs to be exterminated. bunch of faggots giggling in the back row

>>15830262
Did Jason Genova let himself go?

>>15831754
Shut the fuck up tranny retard I eat kiwis and that’s all I know about them

>>15829940
You know what? This triggers me, not only because he unironically believes that myers briggs functions are inherently gendered, but even under the assumption that we can use these functions as pure representations of masculinity and femininity, he has proved to be an absolute brainlet in applying them.

Under the strange assumption that these functions are masculine or feminine, it would only make sense to make te masculine and fe feminine. Among the perceiving functions those are definitely the most masculine and feminine, and one person is only supposed to use one of these - te users used fi and fe users use ti.

Te is about planning and doing. The stereotypical shady american venture capitalist is a strong user of this function. Outside of this, Germany is probably one of the best cultural representations of te. The two most common male mbti types, istj and estj, use this function.
Te is definitely not feminine.

Fe, on the other hand, is feminine. Fe is about keeping the peace with other people, it's about empathy and having an emotional connection. They are the people pleasers because doing so pleases them and not because they necessarily need something in return. The two most common mbti types for women are isfj and esfj, both of who use fe.

If you're going to be a pseud, please don't be this retarded. It's for your own benefit.

>>15831754
tell me with a straight face that Horia is not lost. the fuck is a kiwi farm?

>>15831669
>>15831683
>most of you can't do better.
Not an argument about anything and it certainly isn't a defense of your own work. Retard.

>>15830336
>So judging from the first pages, this is just some pseud's diary?
Yes. I told him to rename it 'The Sperger Diaries' and make the emphasis of the book about his struggle as an incel, but he just chewed me out and got offended that I'd try to make a 'cheap gag' out of his book.

>>15831683
>most of you can't do better.

In this case, my friend, I think most of us could.

>>15831754
i agree but this has nothing to do with what he said. stop rambling.

>>15829883
>what I think and believe is right!! 1!
>i am extremely scientific : ^))
Is this satire?

>Still no pdf
c'mon, /lit/. Skip a mcdonnald menu for today and share this amazing ramblings of a /pol/ schizo.

>>15831854
You wouldn't know newfriend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms

speaking of /lit/ classics, did pic related ever get published in any way?

The best thing about Horia's shitpost is the sheer temerity of the title. It's straight out of a Jack Donovan or Guenon reading list

>>15832371
I doubt it was ever real, especially since the provided passage failed to demonstrate his claimed nigger density. Still funny tho

>>15829833
Horia, if you are in this thread please contact me at raisingkeynes1@gmail dot com. Can't share details here

>>15832756
Horia this is very important

>>15832756
HORIA, GET THE FUCK IN HERE AND E-MAIL ME ASAP!! THERE ISN’T MUCH TIME!

>>15832319
My rhetoric is not even close to that shit. Harrassing, doxing, and attacking are the complete the opposite of telling someone they are lost and need to find another way. This is about being honest. This book is beyond salvation or correction. The good news is that knowing one is utterly lost might the first step on the right journey.

>>15829900

This page is based, he's right. NATO should pay tribute to us in exchange for defense as though we were a true empire dominating their countries

>>15833038
>pay the americans for defense from the jihadists and jews they'll be funding with NATO's money
No thanks. True empires could directly extract tribute rather than begging for it.

>>15833071

well ofc that's what I mean. Give us gibs or we'll violently loot and plunder your country

>>15829833

Honest critique:

#1: do not use abstractions without properly defining them, this causes your writing to be incoherent. It comes across and hare brained and egotistical, bording on schizo word salad at some points. Just be more rigorous and consistent, heavily edit and review what you right so you are certain that you are staying focused and on topic

#2, choose a narrow topic or variety of topics you are highly familiar with, or build up knowledge in a specific domain. You discuss things in an overgeneral sense without discrete examples and specification, this betrays a lack of knowledge on your part.

These 2 problems are the main reason why your work comes across as so cringe. And I'm sorry that anons are ridiculing you so harshly but I hope this is a learning experience for you (if you're reading this)

>>15833113
>heavily edit and review what you right
>what you right
So ironic

>>15830002
I can't believe people thought this was unironic. Retards

>>15833144
it's not ironic your retarded subhuman

>>15833169
It's pretty ironic that you made a proofreading mistake in the very sentence recommending to avoid them

>>15833178
No it's not retard there's a differece between a 4chan post and a published book you disgustig subhuman with no cognitive abilities

Horia if you're interested I can translate your Magnus Opus to german

>>15833366
He could barely translate his own thoughts into English, so good luck with that

>>15829833
Where's the fucking pdf Horia? Or did you unironically kys by this time? :*)

Face it, his writing is only cringe because it's not a far cry from how you would be if you lacked self-awareness and rigour, and it reminds you of your own cringe. Laughing at it and even bullying him is some hardcore overcompensating and equally as cringe as his writings. He just needs to become aware of his Dunning-Kruger and start actually learning, like everyone does at some point. Don't be intimidated by this shitposting OP, just start researching the things you wrote about; read books written by related authors and see what they already thought on the subjects.

Choke on a cock, OP. You can't have a thread about a book that nobody wants to read.

>>15829833
Daily reminder to never read books younger than 10 years old. Time proves the worth of books. OP, we’ll see if your book stands the test of time, if it is still relevant in a century from now

>synthesis

Dropped

>>15834380
It is. But the fact that he didn't even put his shit on /crit/ until he wrote 400 pages is staggering.

>>15834537
>he reads books by people that are still alive

Is the text really not justified?

Where’s the original thread? I can’t find it in the archive.

>>15834380
Yeah, I'm laughing and secretly worrying if my ideas are just as bad. But I don't think they're THAT bad.

>>15834694
>>15824974

sorry I don’t read philosophy from far-right edgelords

The way he puts "no previous background in philosophy" as a positive in the Amazon description is really laughable. In my experience, any time I've had an "original" philosophical idea, I quickly discover that someone has already written a book or several about it. I think that's largely why genuine philosophy has died out in modern times and leads to this schizo trash i.e. everything good has already been thought of

Has anyone posted this to /pol/ yet? They’d eat it up.

>>15830148
>it all gives way to weird meditations on dickgirls in no time at all. Does the author really think that the average person thinks about dickgirls as a political archetype?
Those are not from the original, it's from shitposters pretending to be Belcea

>>15830002
>we need to cancel this guy and burn his books. The ideas of this books are essentially the foundation of a new white supremacy
Talk about 5-star recommendation! Thanks, anon. Am ordering now.

>>15834537
>10
Are you saying you're reading books from the 2000s?

>>15834380
Textbook projection from this post

>>15834380
Cope. I think you might be repressing some memories from your teenage years, based on a preliminary psychoanalysis. A pure projection, yes.

>>15835680
>>15835777
If I'm wrong then why are you trying to bully OP? Do you want to admit to being a sadistic sociopath?

>>15835797
>Do you want to admit to being a sadistic sociopath?
A sociopath aware they're a sociopath no longer qualifies as a sociopath; no amount of self-reflection can cure the puerile cringe in this book.

>>15835815
>A sociopath aware they're a sociopath no longer qualifies as a sociopath
I don't think that's how it works. Being consciously and willingly sociopathic would be even worse.

>>15835797
OH NO SOMEONE IS MEAN ON 4CHAN CALL THE PSYCH WARD

>>15835863
>muh 4chan is le epic place for edgelords
>>>/b/

>>15835826
If you have the self analysis to identify your behaviour as a problem, then you aren't in the dysfunction range; at that point it becomes choice, thus not compulsive, and thus not a sociopath.

The garbage written in that book is so absent of self awareness, that it has no capacity to 'fix' itself in any shape or form.

I would rather, in this scenario, identify as a sociopath knowing I'm a sociopath, and thus the reflective opportunity to change, than exist in the mire of stupidity that would have me forever relegated to the types of thinking in that book.

>>15835887
As I said, willingly engaging in sociopathic behaviour would be even worse. I'm not saying OP's book can be fixed, but his attitude and way of engaging with the ideas definitely can.

>>15835910
>willingly engaging in sociopathic behaviour would be even worse
Well, as sociopathy is defined by a very broad set of behaviours driven by compulsion that makes it a dysfunction, I think I'm ok with that. Let's take a look at some of these:
>Being callous, cynical and disrespectful of others
>Using charm or wit to manipulate others for personal gain or personal pleasure
>Arrogance, a sense of superiority and being extremely opinionated
>Impulsiveness or failure to plan ahead
And from another source...
>being impulsive or incapable of planning ahead
>being irritable and aggressive
>being consistently irresponsible
Does this make menopausal women sociopaths for being irritable? Does it make everyone that uses glib a sociopath? You see the spectrum of behaviours is huge, so for you to say 'engaging in sociopathic behaviours willingly is bad', is honestly pretty dumb, because I'm quite confident that everyone engages in some form of sociopathic behaviour - we just tend to call it amoral, but even then this depends on the circumstance of its utilisation.

What even is this? What's it about? Is it a right wing or left wing book? I can't tell by the comments.

>>15836053
Read it and find out

>>15836053
Does it really matter which way it leans? It's a glorious shitpost

I'm starting to become genuinely curious what would happen ifI'd ever finished my manifesto.
>I believe that the methods of thought which most Americans engage in can be mostly cast along a spectrum ranging from concrete to abstract. The concrete thinker concerns himself with the daily affairs of existence. He wants tasty food, spectacular entertainment, and pleasant company amongst his peers. The abstract thinker is more complex. He wants the best food, whether defined in terms of physical fitness or cultural cachet, he wants to explore his entertainment for thematic implications, he wants his friends to argue against his viewpoints so that he may counter their arguments and demonstrate his intellectual superiority.
>I imagine by now you've decided which group you belong to and therefore decided which group is best. If you're reading essays for fun, you mostly likely consider yourself an abstract thinker. But like I said earlier, it is a spectrum. The concrete thinker does not eschew profound philosophical statements, he just prefers for them to be delivered amongst dragons and spaceships. The abstract thinker can hardly resist the spectacle of a well-choreographed fight scene, but he grows bored if there is no higher purpose behind it. Something greater than one man's physical safety or athletic prestige must be at stake.

>>15830041
cringe

>>15836538
This abstract thinker seems to oddly confine his thinking to a narrow spectrum. He wants to explore his entertainment for the thematic implications? Word salad, for one,and utterly meaningless without reflecting on the root of his value system. I'm sure upon reflection he will learn that he thinks in fewer abstractions that first thought.

A narrow spectrum is hardly less constricting than a binary at some point.

>>15831683
Most of us may not be able to do better, but I assure that 90% of /lit/ can do the same. And all of us can read better, asa ca sugi pula de autist. Mai învață engleză, bă Horia. Nu îți mai da atâta laba

>>15837925
/lit/ should come together to, in an collective effort, actually do better.

>>15838126
Do better in what way? Horia Belcea got some constructive criticism along with the bashing. If he had posted on /crit/ or has found a review buddy he wouldn’t have embarrassed himself.

>>15838126
Did you see any of the /lit/ collaborations like the Legacy of Totalitarianism in a Tundra books? They make Belcea's book look like a masterpiece in comparison.

>>15838605
I'll have you know the Coronameron is miles ahead of The Synthesis!