[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 2.11 MB, 2368x3507, IMG_20200630_175332~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15743312 No.15743312 [Reply] [Original]

Does not contain Ulysses but so far it's pretty good. I'm probably going to read The Dead a second time through.

>> No.15743338

>>15743312
>Does not contain Ulysses
Funny that. I bet the cheap bastards didn't include Finnegans Wake either

>> No.15743346

>>15743312
>Does not contain Ulysses
Why would it? It says "Dubliners"... although Ulysses did start out as a short story to be included in Dubliners but obviously it grew far to large for that.
lol imagine if Dubliners came out and it had all the same stories but also had the entirety of Ulysses in it

>> No.15743350

>>15743338
>huge complete Joyce collection with tiniest font is cheaper than Dubliners

>> No.15743353

>>15743312
Why would it contain Ulysses, retard?

>> No.15743358

>>15743312
Dubliners is very comfortable and well paced, it contains a germ of the labyrinthine style in the longer novels. If you're "reading Joyce" it's nice, but not entirely necessary, to get a feel for his short stories. More than anything it's just a charming - or not so much - picture of the city lol

>> No.15743361

>>15743346
Plus the fart letters in an appendix

>> No.15743380

>>15743312
it's a good starter if you haven't read joyce before

>> No.15743381

>>15743346
>>15743353

I don't know, I just got the thing.

>> No.15743385

>>15743346
>>15743353

I don't know, I just got the thing.

>> No.15743394

>>15743380
I have not read Joyce before.

>> No.15743410

>>15743394
Read Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man next.

>> No.15743419

>>15743312
What do you like most about it?

>> No.15743583

>>15743410
I love this book. shame about Ulysses though

>> No.15743613

>>15743410
Are you telling he didn't contain that one either??

>> No.15743640

>>15743419
Can't tell, but I did dislike the fact that it didn't contain Ulysses though

>> No.15743642

>>15743613
It didn't contain A Portrait of the Artist as Young Man

>> No.15743719

Yes I'm a retard I didn't know.

>> No.15744090

>>15743312
>>15743381
>>15743385

He doesn't know, he just got the thing

>> No.15744402

The best short stories ever written by a country mile. Disturbing, heady, poignant, immense attention to detail and a real tapestry, as opposed to a collection of threads.

>> No.15744414

The Dead was the worst in the collection

>> No.15744428

>>15744090
Give him a break, he doesn't know, he just got the thing

>> No.15744571

>>15744414
>why yes im a contrarian for attention, how did you know?

>> No.15744578
File: 79 KB, 432x525, 1593200287906.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15744578

>>15743312
>Does not contain Ulysses
/lit in a nutshell

>> No.15744585

>>15743312
Araby and The Dead are up there with the best short stories I've ever read. The rest are solid as well, though none of them stuck with me like those two.

>> No.15744608

>tfw my favorite book is dubliners
what does this sentence make you guys think of me

>> No.15744626

>>15744608
you probably havent read a lot of other books, but if you had, then whatever, its your favorite book. are you so insecure you need us to validate it?

>> No.15744641

>>15744626
nope, just curious. haven't been on /lit/ for around 5 years

>> No.15744902

Do you have autism?

>> No.15744905

>>15744641
is it true it was better back then?

>> No.15744924

>>15744905
same soup just reheated

>> No.15745032

>>15744608
Containing Ulysses or without it?

>> No.15745053

>>15745032
I thought it was normal for dubliners to contain ulysses? that's initially why I clicked on the thread, to see what version OP got.

>> No.15745139

>>15744905
It was the same. DFW, Pynchon, Nietzsche, no sign of slowing down.

>> No.15745415

>>15744428
He's only now gotten the thing, give him a minute to check, he doesn't know

>> No.15745424

>>15743583
Yeah this sucks / would recommend that OP maybe plays for a discount? Possible that the chapter was ripped out? Or it's a misprint? Definitely return to the store and make a fool of yourself