/lit/ - Literature

Linkola was not an eco-fascist

I have mixed feelings towards eco-fascism but find it a very interesting subject. There's a thread on another site about ecofascism, I wish I could remember where. I got this chart from there.

>>15705964
Daily reminder that the only people which will read books on that subject and therefore rearrange their own reproduction aren't those which are at fault for the problem. Ecology is a non-issue in a homogenious society which is self-controlling and will regulate density depending on ecological options - without external jews.

>>15705964
>eco-facism
No such thing

>>15705964
The only ones I could recommend would be Linkola and Ted but they aren’t really eco fascist. Devi’s book is retarded and the fact that it keeps showing up in these charts is mind boggling, basically proof that no one actually reads.

>>15705964
it's not my thing; but a guy in /pol/ claiming to be one posted his shelf a few weeks ago.

>let's kill primitives because they aren't white but keep Bezos alive!!
meme ideology

>>15707228
I wonder how many of his grindr dates have tried to bolt after seeing this bookshelf

>>15707227
bezos gets to be a trillionaire because of the brown hordes filling the ocean with plastic, they are a single beast

>>15707228
>juchepilled
absolutely based

>>15705964
Kaczynski wasn't Eco-Fash necessarily himself but he is mandatory eco-fascist /lit/. He was a genius who diagnosed the problem near perfectly, he had an unrealistic vision for the solution though.

Bump

Nice ears

I wish there was a better name for this genre.

"Eco fash" sounds incredibly edgy for what is basically socially rightwing ecology.

>>15709931
Blame the retards who coined it and adopted that cringe imagery.

>>15707228
>Representing /lit/ /fit/ /pol/ /out/ and maybe /his/, $1000
>Your whole life crafted by 4chan, priceless.

>>15710009
Collective unconscious hivemind gang. Also you're kinda gay if you don't understand the pushing of envelopes and mixing truth with humor so they're never sure when you're serious

>>15705964
The Hermeneutics of Ecological Limitation, The Philosophy of Ted Kaczynski and The Later Philosophy of Pentti Linkola, all them by Chad A. Haag. I haven't read none yet, but the first one seems really interesting.

>>15707227
No one has ever said that

>>15707228
what a fucking poseur

what religions pairs well with ecofashion?

>>15710676
Neoplatonism. Read Gaia and Deep Ecology.

Lord of the Rings

>>15707228
does this guy just throw away all of his dust jackets or something

>>15707228
>all meme books
Why can't anyone be normal anymore? Why all the ridiculous political larping?

I don't understand all this eco stuff.

>>15707179
>ecology is a non-issue in a homogenious [sic] society
Is this post a joke?
>>15705964
If you are interested in deep ecology, the origin of the phrase, the paper "The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement" by Arne Naess is a fine place to start, as are a handful of books providing an overview of the movement (e.g. Deep Ecology by Devall & Sessions). There are a few collections of writing by Naess available that will provide a good overview as well. Ecological theory is a pretty diverse area, and there are many authors who overlap in some way with deep ecology without being explicitly part of the movement.

On the other hand, if you are interested in eco-fascism (i.e. using environmentalism as a mask to make your abhorrent politics more palatable), I would suggest killing yourself.

>>15710790
post your shelf so we can see what normal looks like