/lit/ - Literature

What the fuck is Tucker Carlson doing there

>>15689167
don't bump the thread idiot

What is pedes? Is that a reddit thing?

I count 4 based books

>>15689171
Bro you just bumped it too bro

>very based

>>15689173
it's Latin for a 'walker'

>>15689173
it's a subtle way to refer to a fellow pedophile ("pede", compare "hebe" or "ephebe")

>>15689181
sage isn't visible

Those are all actually decent books

>>15689167
He's okay lately, he's like babby's first paleocon.

>>15689173
"MAGApedes" was a third-order emanation of alt right culture shit on reddit Trump boards, I believe, so the joke is that conservatives are part of that reddit "Lady 'pede here ;)" cringe milieu

>>15689150
sage

nice

>>15689150
>reading books with the format title: subtitle
Is there anything more midwit?

fuck off this is a leftist board retard

>>15689150
So you cheering on the fact that you wasted $100+

>>15689150
For My Legionnares is the only worthwhile text

>>15691514
no

OP faggotry aside, is Evola worth reading? I keep hearing mixed opinions

Specifically Ride the Tiger

>>15689150
>FBIanon gets his study materials

You forgot this, fellow pede :)

>>15689150
Bro, you're crazy. There is such a thing as knowing too much, you know.

>>15691633
Jokes aside, do I have to read Marx and Freud to get into this, or is common knowledge of Marxism and psychoanalysis enough to understand it?
Also, why are philosophers still supporting Freud when most of his theories have been discredited by psychologist?

>>15691673
That book aint supporting freud

>>15691673
>>15691683
Marx you are likely already familiar with by osmosis. But for a book called Anti-Oedipus you should read some Freud

Scruton, Buchanan, Heinlein, and Codreanu can stay. The rest of you have to go.

>>15689150
You're not going to understand Revolt if you have it in a pile with Tucker Carlson based off of what r/thedonald told you to buy

did you actually buy all the books on a pol reading list?
you won't read evola properly...

>>15691617
yes he is but not from the perspective of a racist incel

>>15689167
The book is similar to 'My Struggle' if you watered it down to the point of being unrecognizable to anyone who has already read the previously mentioned book.

What the fuck is this? The shittiest stack I’ve ever seen. I’m fucking laughing right now

>>15691947
Cope

>>15691900
With what mindset should I approach the book?

Save them for the cold winter. I've heard conservative books burn slowly.

>>15691617
Skip 'Revolt Against the Modern World's unless you want to take a deep dive into the philosophy itself. 'Men Among the Ruins' is much more readable and enjoyable, as the text isn't clogged with nearly as much jargon.

>>15691999
He's memeing you, to a degree. Evola isn't as ardent a proponent of race being the foundation of a society, unlike what is more popular among the more far right groups. Though, that's not to say that he ignores it entirely. In fact, he speaks of several kinds of racial elements, like that of the body and the soul. I'd tackle moreso as a critique of modernity, but there's a lot of be gleamed outside of just his critique.

>>15689150
You have like 30 good years left of life at best. Why would you waste it filling your head with this nonsense?

The alt right is such a gay autistic subculture

>>15689150
Have fun lobotomizing yourself.

>>15691999
open mind. not attempting to reinforce a world view.
though this applies to all literature I guess.

>>15689177
Evola accounting for three?

>>15692143
you're right

i should read harry potter to better understand drumpff

>>15692118
produced by a society

>>15689173
An old 2016 meme about Trump being likened to a centipede. There are a bunch of old "trump owns the libs" compilations that begin with a nature documentary style voice talking about the centipede like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKH6PAoUuD0..

>>15691673
> his theories have been discredited by psychologist
They've not been discredited as much as rejected due to their lack of scientific rigor. Much of his clinical work was based on a small pool of patients which is why it's not well regarded anymore by modern psychologists.