/lit/ - Literature

Kant was first to grasp the self-sufficiency of thought,
Yet his system cut us off from the very thing he sought.
If knowledge is the concept and the object what exists,
Then concept matches object, but here the logic twists,
For concept is the in-itself of the object that we seek,
And this is all we need to overcome the first Critique:
If consciousness is the same as being, being's other side,
Then just negate the difference and watch the two collide!

>>15620939
I have no clue about what are you going on, but the main problem with Kant is that the establishment of syntetic a priori is impossible with either a priori analytic or a posteriori synthetic arguments, hence his arguments end up relying on equivocations.

>>15620568
>tfw accidentally memorized the song
feels good

>>15621511
But a problem here arises with respect to natural science
While empirical in method, on pure thought it lays reliant.
although for Newton's findings, we to Newton give the glory...
Newton never could have found them if they weren't known a priori!

>>15621818
cute megumin

Do you like the death metal version?

>>15622090
YOU MAY RECALL THAT SPACE AND TIME ARE FORMS OF APPREHENSION
AND THEREFORE WHAT WE SENSE HAS SPATIO-TEMPORAL EXTENSION
WHATEVER IS EXTENDED IS COMPOSED OF A PLURALITY
BUT THROUGH AND ACT OF SYNTHASES WE FORM A COMMONALITY

We know that Nature is governed by principles immutable
But how we come to know this is inherently inscrutable
That thought requires logic, is a standpoint unassailable
But for objects of our senses, explanations aren't available ;_;