/lit/ - Literature

I am so much smarter than him that without even having read him I can tell that he is not worth a minute of my time, purely based on a priori reasoning.

>>15471677
Wait, how do you reason a priori? Have you transcended metaphysics?

"Take half of the meds" - Hegel

>>15471665
>Read
Who even reads in 2020?

>>15471665
ok.

I'm still working on kant, be patient

I’m in the process.

>>15471894
DESU, I found the introduction of Phenomenology of spirit a lot easier to read than CoPR. A lot more aphoristic language instead of leagues of jargon.

>>15471909
>introduction
aight

I read PoS and Jena era texts, how do I proceed?

>>15471951
SoL obviously

>>15471665
Here. Someone write “Read Hegel” on this

Actually then, does anyone know what an essential prerequisite list for The Science of Logic would be?

>>15471827
Yes. It's not something that Hegel would teach you about.

I want to. But I don't want to read Kant. What do I do?

>>15472305
Why do people who get filtered by Kant still pursue "scientific" philosophy?
You clearly aren't able to follow it.

>>15472320
i have never read kant. it is just that i would have to waste at least 3 months reading him. and i'd rather waste this or even more time with hegel

>>15472333
why do you *assume* that reading Kant will be a waste?

>>15472333
kys

>>15472347
Just look at him.

>>15471665
Nah, read Rowling, she's one of us

>>15472333
you are a hopless case. DO what you want since you won't understand anything anyway.

>>15472357
>>15472509
wew kantfags really seethe much

>>15472509
Ah yes, the brilliant Kant, incomprehensible to anyone who doesn't already like him.

>>15471665
Im pretty early on kant so it will take a while

>>15472305
You read kant

>>15471665
Even Hegel didn't know how to read himself