[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 254 KB, 900x761, heck.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15455465 No.15455465 [Reply] [Original]

Is this accurate?

>> No.15455476

>>15455465
Top row, definitely.

>> No.15455477

we should bring back rage comics on 4chan

>> No.15455478
File: 187 KB, 1440x1769, 1566032759407.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15455478

>Marx
>Engles
>Lenin
>Stalin
>Mao

>> No.15455479

why picking on diogenes

>> No.15455493
File: 46 KB, 412x500, 167363-a01064e3fb2028cbff55967b05f28f56.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15455493

>Shakespeare
>Wolfe
>Tolstoy
>Moliere

>> No.15455498

>>15455465
Wouldn't Doomer be reading Nietzsche and Bloomer be reading Kierkegaard?

>> No.15455512

>>15455465
Yes

>> No.15455520

>>15455498
Have you ever read Nietzsche?

>> No.15455531

>>15455465
What's bottom left guy supposed to be? I'm not up to date on this meme.

>> No.15455537

>>15455531
bloomer

>> No.15455541

>>15455465
Pretty accurate desu

>> No.15455551

>>15455465
>diogenes who advocated for wanking off in public, often in front of women you find attractive regardless of consent is onions
Are things that gain sudden internet popularity just considered onions now?

>> No.15455559
File: 202 KB, 1080x959, Screenshot_20200526_145436.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15455559

I have Augustine and Aristotle on my shelf. After reading it them, what doomercore should I begin with?

>> No.15455568

>>15455479
reddit

>> No.15455575

>adorno
>kant
>aristotle
>lukacs
>rousseau

>> No.15455579
File: 5 KB, 222x227, images (9).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15455579

>>15455575
*

>> No.15455581

>>15455551
Diogenes is normie tier autist cringe

>> No.15455587

>>15455581
>women are only good for sex
>money and consoomerism is bad
>you should shit piss and beat off in public
>shouldn't care about your appearance
could you give me a cynic ideal that's normie?

>> No.15455591

>>15455465
Yes, this is good

>> No.15455612

>>15455465
Yes it accurate in that all retards and memelords read philosophy.

>> No.15455614

>>15455465
I don't get the second meme face on the second row. Who is he supposed to be?

>> No.15455622

>>15455568
reddit opinion

>> No.15455623

>>15455587
All of the above is normie, but what's your favorite book by diogenes the cynic? Where should I start?

>> No.15455635

Me being all 6 of them without actively engaging with any of the text.

>> No.15455682

Where do i start with kant?

>> No.15455686

>>15455465
>what I like GOOD, what I don’t like BAD

>> No.15455721

how is hume a onions redditor?

>> No.15455749

>>15455682
Ground for the metaphysics on morals and prolegomena on future metaphysics

>> No.15455763

>>15455635
That's why you're all six of them.

Personally I like to read Jung, Freud, Plato, and Aurelius but I'm a fan of Gigachad's favorite reads.

>> No.15455773

>>15455682
His work on Ethics. Categorical Imperative and such. Don't bother with Metaphysics. (Physics is near to solving metaphysics).

>> No.15455776

>>15455773
You're retarded.

>> No.15455780

>>15455721
he was anglophone and pro-science, anti- metaphysical rambling.

>> No.15455782

>>15455478
>>15455575
based

>> No.15455802

>nassim
>nicholas
>taleb

>> No.15455829

>>15455623
there's only secondary texts also not caring about appearance seems anti normie to me, MIT has a good intro to cynicism

>> No.15455853

>>15455614
NPC Chad

>> No.15455870

>>15455465
>Doomer
>Kierkegaard

Bloomer
>Nietzsche

Honestly you would think its the opposite, but paradoxically you got it totally accurate.

>> No.15455886

>>15455870
I dont get it

>> No.15455903

>>15455780
he was pro-science in an age of superstition, when newton and boyle's work had recently been published and he appreciated the direction in which "natural" philosophy was going. his anti-metaphysical views were just scepticism in response to descartes. this is a little different to the reddit-tier scientism, but i don't expect the morons that make these pictures to have actually read of this stuff.

>> No.15455906

I'd say Sartre and Stirner are misplaced

>> No.15455909

>>15455465
>Left shit being chad
Ok nice try for a bait

>> No.15455915

>>15455906
Should just be a picture of a waiter for Sartre

>> No.15455917
File: 168 KB, 290x269, 1568348338487.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15455917

>>15455773
>Physics is near to solving metaphysics

>> No.15455922

>>15455465
>grouping Kierkegaard with Houllebecq
>grouping Hume, Stirner and Diogenes with the euphoric retards
>putting Freud and Jung together
The absolute state of this retard

>> No.15455950

>>15455829
>there's only secondary texts
No shit. If diogenes the cynic, somebody whose "philosophy" is only known through a couple amusing stories, is one of your favorite philosophers, you shouldn't be on this board

>> No.15455958
File: 51 KB, 413x243, soy bounce.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15455958

>>15455773
>Don't bother with Metaphysics. (Physics is near to solving metaphysics).

>> No.15455969

>>15455950
cringe

>> No.15456051
File: 1.42 MB, 245x182, rust_kys.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15456051

>>15455903
we are still in an age of superstition. not relevant anyway.
>his anti-metaphysical views were just scepticism in response to descartes
no it wasn't he had real arguments for them. not just "descartes was wrong". why bring this up?
>this is a little different to the reddit-tier scientism
how so? this board and continentals will call anyone arguing along the lines of hume against nonsensical philosophy a reddit bugman.

diagnosis: butthurt anti-science pseud coping with being BTFO by bringing up irrelevant things trying to make himself seem smart.

>> No.15456076

>>15455465
how is dawkins not top left?

>> No.15456096

>>15455969
This is a board for literature, not for "old dead faggots who I heard a funny story about in a youtube video I saw on reddit"

>> No.15456105

>>15456096
Let's just not discuss any ancient stuff then since we have so few sources on them
You absolute retard

>> No.15456214
File: 121 KB, 720x683, 1588951560941.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15456214

>>15455498
every single fucking time kek

>> No.15456217

>>15455773
>>15455776
>>15455917
>>15455958
So how do i start im even more confused i was gonna just read the critic of pure reason

>> No.15456231

>>15455950
I never said he was and you know cynicism extends beyond diogenes right? or do you only know the ebin barrel man from reddit?

>> No.15456345

>>15455465
Freud is doomer but also bloomer

>> No.15456388

>>15456051
you are confused. you're accusing me of being both pro and anti science. arguing with yourself dumbass.

>> No.15456397

>>15455478
Based.

>> No.15456400

>>15456217
Start with him only if you read Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, and Hume (if you really want to, read Leibniz and Locke) then start Kant with Prolegomena (shorter text, written after the first Critique, helps with understanding his philosophy, he wrote it because of the misunderstanding of his previous work). After that you can read his three Critiques.

>> No.15456401

>>15455465
I can see which philosophers you don't like.

>> No.15456402
File: 215 KB, 769x1038, 1570552572685.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15456402

>>15455478

>> No.15456406

>>15455479
>why pick on a fictional character with no first hand writings

>> No.15456412

>>15455559
Orwell is definitely NPC core.

>> No.15456428
File: 50 KB, 300x400, smack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15456428

>Sade
>Machiavelly
>Sun Tzu
>Osamu Dazai
>David Foster Wallace
>Anthony Burroughs

>> No.15456486

>>15456428
>>Anthony Burroughs
Holy shit, this board sucks.

>> No.15456490
File: 182 KB, 250x276, 1587502227375.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15456490

>nietzche
>rand
>stirner

>> No.15456514

>>15456486
t.yuppie

>> No.15456594

>>15455478
based based based based

>> No.15456603

>>15455493
Moliere fucking sucks

>> No.15456620

>>15456603
I feel sad for you.

>> No.15456695

>>15456514
? He combined Anthony Burgess and William Burroughs.

>> No.15457055
File: 179 KB, 1400x963, ANINV6O3Q5FWHEFCH3NR3UQEII.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15457055

>>15455465
Anybody who identifies with the doomer is a fucking faggot.

>> No.15457099

>>15457055
>posts doomer

>> No.15457118

>>15455465
Not familiar with Goonan but you could stick Nietzsche with Land and the bunch.

>> No.15457125

>>15455465
Top right needs Ellul.

>> No.15457137

>>15455465

Bitch get Hume out of nu-male tier, they don't even read anything above the God Delusion. Stirner also.

>> No.15457220

>>15455478
>marxist
>chad

https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/caveman-politics/201803/science-weighs-in-conservatives-look-better
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29355104/
https://www.susqu.edu/about-su/newsroom/research-finds-attractive-people-more-likely-to-be-conservative
https://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2018/01/beautiful_people_more_likely_t.html
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008733
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807452/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322194494_Are_political_views_and_religiosity_related_to_facial_morphology_Evidence_from_a_Turkish_sample

>> No.15457252

>>15457220
the right can't meme

>> No.15457256
File: 955 KB, 2324x3330, 091d946371f816765d8ce20409eb169b4ae9387f3979db4075ff18b57f956bb6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15457256

>>15457220
>y...you're ugly
Ten four dinosaur

>> No.15457320

>>15455465
I've never met anyone who actually read a Rand book.

>> No.15457351

>>15457256
>blonde hair and blue eyes
What did the Soviet Union mean by this?

>> No.15457374

>>15455465
>Freud
>bloomer
How the fuck is "dude, everything is about fucking and dicks" Jew anything but a doomer?

>> No.15457561

>>15457351
lol

>> No.15457592

>>15457351
propaganda

>> No.15457657

>>15455498
Definitely not