/lit/ - Literature

because of "for educational purposes" excuse

jews

>>15327044
Why should it?

>>15327102
5:18

faggot confirmed at 5:34

>>15327044
Stop shilling your videos you faggot.

>>15327044

it hasn't been deleted because nobody really cares

>>15327202
adults touching each other's private parts in a non-sexual way? what's wrong with that? are you American? Bacause those cunts are such prudes.

wtf?!

>>15327243
Friendly reminder that one of the entries to report a post is "This post is advertising or begging."

He's so aesthetic

Why would it be deleted?

>>15327455

it's about a book though, you're just too much of a tool to get it. Or you're a prude who freaks out when he sees penises.

Do yourselves a favour /lit/. Get off this site and read a book.

>>15327485

fuck off Quentin

>>15327485
based Quen

>>15327485
based q

not only am i going to report this thread, but i will also report that video to the authorities.

he is sexy

>>15327575

you better report him for being too sexy as well.

>>15327575
>t.

>>15327044
What terms of service did this break? Are you guys really that fragile that this mundane shit shakes you up. jesus

he has you on the ropes /lit/

>>15327477

/lit/ BTFO

>>15327485
based based based based

>>15327756
he's jacking him off, it's not educational at all. It's a dude being jacked off. Wtf.

>>15327827
They're not jacking off. They're barely touching each other. Have you ever jacked off?

this shit is fucking retarded

>>15327827
And? Other youtube videos on Bataille show graphic pictures of people being tortured.

The Americans on this site, I swear

>>15327842
No i haven't ever jacked off. You're disgusting, this isn't literature.

>>15327827
there must be other 'artistic' gay porn up on youtube

>>15327853
Bataille the writer and philosopher isn't literature? cope more yankee

>>15327857
So people tried this shit years ago and were banned from the google platform for it.

>>15327861
>>15327857

ok wtf you guys are just defending this because it's a dude jacking off another dude on youtube. there isn't artistic merit. It's just another dude jacking off another dude, that you think is funny, because it's on youtube. Where is the art? Show me exactly where the artistic merit lies.

>>15327853
haha this nerd prude. go back to your nunnery

>>15327869
>I am offended by it therefore everyone should be!

Christ dude, not even Youtube is as prude as you

>>15327861
Bataille was a homosexual and a cuck and thus not a philosopher. Sorry faggot, stay mad.

>>15327873
cringe

>>15327869
It's provocative and raw. The fact that you're having this reaction shows it succeeded as provocative art.

>>15327485
please have sex with me

>>15327876

just show me the artistic merit. you can't because there is none.

fuck e celebs

>>15327878
>being so buttfrustrated that you have to make believe fake stories

>>15327880
cope

>>15327893

pepe is an eceleb.

>>15327891
artistic merit is subjective. Show me an objective system of measuring art that isn't just "muh opinions"

>>15327893
Q is not a celebrity, though.

>>15327893
cringe

>>15327485
stop smoking your skin looks terrible

>>15327902

video starts, man shouting, bad editing. videos of animals being killed??? ok, shitty music, shitty dancing,... Now the main bit, two dudes jacking each other off. then fucking this dude just sings "let me entertain you" with ronan keating (sped up?) in background.

how can you guys defend this literal turd of visual-audio media? how far are your heads up your asses?

>>15327920
Why are you getting so triggered over this? Literally just hide the thread if you can't accept it

>>15327920
Bro you just dont get it.....

>>15327930
there's nothing to get

>>15327920
Do Mormons have internet access now?

>>15327485
Eat shit and die attention whore.

>>15327932
that's exacly what a non-getter would say.

>>15327933
Just Americans getting triggered over minor nudity as always

>>15327939
he's alright. trupfags like you are cringe, though.

>>15327261
>adults touching each other's private parts in a non-sexual way
they were literally jacking each other off tho

>>15327960
Its not sexual until one of them gets hard, you know the rules

>>15327960
I mean it was not really jacking off. There was nothing erotic about it, they were basically just waving each others dicks around randomly

>>15327950
I wouldn't post under a tripcode unless it were for the specific reason of rattling people on this board.

>>15327939
>tripfag
>calling someone an attention whore

>>15327971
lmao you got fucking wrecked

>>15327960
They didn't seem to enjoy it in a sexual way and their penises never reached full erection. True masturbation is tougher and comepletely different.

>>15327971

What’s the reason?
Asking for a friend

>>15327980
i see you are an expert in such matters

>>15327971
sounds like you're also an attention whore. just nastier and more annoying.

I wonder if Q rapes children

>>15327044

If this is Q then serious question, what do you want to get out of all this? WHY?

What's with all the fanboys for the literal definition of OP is faggot?

>>15327991
>loses argument
>let's see if the shaming works hehe
Do prudes really...?

How are you nignogs this triggered over a fucking video?
Fucking retards.

>>15327992
and less interesting

>>15327994
he's just fucking with you. as well as creating thought-provoking art. you just got filtered.

i cant wait to tweet this to blue-haired journos so they can write a story about it

>>15327044

Do you have power? Do you have protection from any backlash? Do you just not give any fucks for real? Who is protecting you?

>>15328020
Q is industry plant, we've always known this.

>>15328020
Do Americans use really "ass" for everything? Or is it an exclusive feature of Negro parlance?

>>15328028
that's a spic

>>15328038
>abdul
obviously an arab

Tell me how this fucking thread is any different from the hundreds of the pointless threads made by coomers and paypigs of some whore whose only claim to fame is having won the genetic lottery. Enlighten me before the mods decide to get rid of this thread alongside the faggot who made it.

>>15328044
oh fuck yeah. that's an arab.

>>15328050
watch the video, if you don't get it, you got filtered friendo.

>>15327252
If nobody cares then why was your mom's vulva sliced offf?

>>15328038
I've seen American people of all backgrounds use it.

>>15328050
You sound like resentful incel. Have sex, tripfag.

>>15328050
filtered

>>15328075

not an argument. no one in this thread has even given their OPINION on why this is a valid artistic work.

>>15328061
Not many people can stand watching cringe for long

>>15328090
they wont do so because the artistic content of the vid boils down to very lame references to violence, sex, and some memes in Bataille

>>15328090
Why shouldn't it be? And who are you to say what's valid and invalid art? You literally got plebfiltered by nudity in fucking 2020. Come the fuck on.

this man proves that /lit/ is not homophobic enough.

>>15328110
gay-friendly enough*

>>15328104
if you're defending it, then give your opinion on why it should be considered art. all i want is your opinion, to laugh at.

>>15328050
Why do you come here if everything triggers you. This isn't your safe space

>>15328061
>>15328075
>>15328085

Sounds like you're thirsty virgins yourselves considering that you're desperate enough to slobber over a man who doesn't even happen to be single

>>15328110
this man proves you're gay

>>15327044
who is this semon demon?

>>15328124
Seems like a waste of them, your mind is made up.

>>15328129
>n-no u
have sex incel

>>15327485
Welcome back, King.

>>15328563
>i can't
Interesting

>>15327992
Oh no, not nasty!

>>15328906
>if you effortpost, I will laugh anyway
It's a catch-22. I'd rather not waste my time. Any argument in good faith starts with a proposition. Prove you are arguing in good faith by providing a reason why you think it's not art.

>>15328000
>being repulsed by someone jerking off his friend for attention is prudish
Do faggots really...?

>>15328932
I'm not him. I won't laugh. Go on, have some fucking balls.

>>15327939
>attention whore
so like a tripcode?

>>15328944
Nobody forced you to watch the video, faggot. Daily reminder.

>people ITT actually calling it "high-art"
yall serious? It's a good visualisation of the ideas of the book, but that's literally it.

>>15328980
>"ehrmehgerd check out this based ebin video, totally /lit/"
>watch video of two grifters jerking each other off
>"wow that's gay and retarded"
>"ehrmehgerd nooone forced u to watch it"
From the bottom of my heart, I implore you to kill yourself.

>>15329006
No one in this thread call it high art you schizo

>>15329055
You literally just admitted you watched it voluntarily TOP FUCKING KEKS

>>15329055
Yet you are still here.

>>15329064
Literally two posters above arguing about whether its art or not. I am not schizo, you are out to lunch

>>15329006
>yall
Nigger/hick detected. Opinion discarded