/lit/ - Literature

Giving that kind of power to the government is very dangerous. So yes, basically because of Hitler.

>>15321530
Any metric you pick for your eugenics is going to be racist

>>15321530
We do practice eugenics, you're just not in the privileged class.

>>15321530
welfare gibs promote disygenics for the proles, while the elite practice their own kind of eugenics, called the "Ivy League"

>>15321540
>Any metric you pick for your eugenics is going to be racist
How?
i think attractive people can be of any ethnic background.

>>15321570
>welfare gibs promote disygenics for the proles
Wrong, welfare means that lower income women are no longer as dependent on support from males, enabling them to be more selective.

>>15321530
>Why was the west so quick abandon eugenics?
It's a hard pill to swallow
>Are there any good arguments against it?
Ethics I guess. Good ones? no
>Was it because of Hitler?
Pretty much
>This whole incel problem would be quickly fixed had we still practiced eugenics today.
It would not

>>15321570
>eugenics, called the "Ivy League"
Have you actually been to any Ivy League or any prestigious college recently?

>>15321592
Even just purely going off attractiveness it's going to be racist, and probably racist towards the usual targets. Like if you're targeting manlets that's going to be basically white supremacy, and facial attractiveness is also skewed in uncomfortable ways.

Maybe whatever ethnicity the guy in your pic is will do alright, I have no idea, but it's not going to just be an equal spread across everyone.

because muh racism

>>15321530
Once you get rid of the obvious hereditary diseases(which is already being done) what are you going to select for? A high IQ score? Economic success is only slightly correlated with IQ and a country of neurotic aesthetes is not going to do well

>>15321530
eugenics was about progress. but in the hands of jewish communists and their propaganda machine, "progress" was redefined to mean dysgenics

>>15321657
The two main incel complaints obviously:
jawline/height.

If you make both men and women take sterilization you would get flak, but if only the male side takes the sterilization one could easily get away with it.

>>15321692
At least 20% of women should be sterilized too, maybe more, if you want this to work properly

>>15321719
The thing is if it applies to women it would probably attract attention from the feminists and so it's best to leave them alone and do it only from the paternal side.

Also we simply give the sterlized males a perpetual government benefit for encouragement what do you think?

>>15321719
Large portions of the male population have died during war and the society still recovered

>>15321692
If women refuse to fuck manlets won't that just happen eventually anyway?

>>15321788
What does that have to do with rooting out women with defective genes?

>>15321788
The problem is that in current era the it goes like this:
>Chad is for fucking
>Beta is for money
>Incel is for killing

Generally most 8 and below women end up with a beta instead of Chad while having her way with chad during her whole prime years.
This is not ideal.

>>15321873
But if the Chad knocked her up?

>>15321530
Take the case of the American Red Apple. A long time ago, farmers noticed that customers preferred red apples that had a bright red color compared to the duller versions. Same apple variety, just people for whatever reason were more likely to buy the bright red apple. So they started breeding their apples to meet consumer demand until we get the red apple today, which is bright red. The unfortunate side effect of doing this is the red apple's skin is much waxier than it used to be and the taste is blander.

>>15321876
That's the ideal but Chads are scarce, i think if we bought back polygamy and all women went to Chad we could get a better gene pool.