[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 87 KB, 480x730, harari-jew.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15300909 No.15300909 [Reply] [Original]

>Book discussion
Things wrong with this globalist fucking essay that advertises itself as a explanation of history:
>Arguments he uses:
>--"Exceptions that prove rules"
>--Provides historical knowledge as evidence something is correct because it was accepted by Romans or Greeks while never considering they could be wrong
>Times he pays tributes to agenda:
>Gender,where doesn't provide any origin of such modern absurd concept breaking his tendency(because he can't)-156-158pag
>Repeating Century of Humiliation communist propaganda-335pag
>PS;jannies here in /lit/ are tranny bitches

>> No.15300940

>>15300909
I made the mistake of reading this without looking at the authors name. As the pages went on I kept getting the nagging suspicion it was made up kike shit. Then it got to the Isreal part.
Fucking heebs.

>> No.15300957

>>15300909
You know, I'm something of a schizoid myself.

>> No.15300983

So, it looks like you read a book. Congrats.
And you hated it, but you’re avoiding why exactly.
More wordy than “what did I think of this?” But still not as helpful

>> No.15301044

>>15300909
This post is too lazy to make sense of. Instead of just listing fallacies like a plebbit tourist, actually list specific examples of the problems you had with the book, and bind them together in a thesis. Considering the amount of time that photo shop must have taken, this much effort should be reasonable.

>> No.15301061

>>15300940
The worst is the fact that he deliberatly marketed to China and it is one of the top10 best selling books there(censored of course).

>> No.15301073
File: 443 KB, 1000x1000, pepetrannykiller1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15301073

Jannie kill yourself>>15301044

>> No.15301084 [DELETED] 
File: 166 KB, 724x776, janniecockssucker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15301084

>>15300983
Jannieeeeeeeeeeee!!!

>> No.15301103
File: 224 KB, 750x1115, pre-raphaelite-brotherhood-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15301103

>>15300909
So am i really the only one who will only read authors that pass the physiognomy check?

Am i really the only person left in this world who considers physical ugliness to be sufficient refutation in itself?

Am i the only one who has ensured that his mind comes only into contact with the theories of the elect, the beautiful of body and soul whose venerable contemplation is medicine to the immortal spirit?

If i see an author and they are physically unattractive, i immediately disregard all that they advocate, knowing by the truest wisdoms that their mental elaborations will only be a further perpetuation of the ugliness their physical form has already demonstrated to all who have eyes to see.

Am i honestly the only one upholding this perennial and venerable gnosis that all ancient sages took as a given?

>> No.15301117
File: 43 KB, 570x587, (you)idiot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15301117

>>15301103
Of course not

>> No.15301128

>>15301084
wtf this is hentai

stop posting hentai

>> No.15301196

>>15301103
im ugly
fuck u

>> No.15301345 [DELETED] 
File: 69 KB, 887x513, jannie-warning.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15301345

>>15300983
Jannie didn't work.Your BAN didn't work

>> No.15301445

>>15300909
>--"Exceptions that prove rules"
The word "prove" in this phrase means "test", of course, but he probably did not use it that way, did he..?

>> No.15301461

>>15301103
And what would you think of Kant and Socrates?

>> No.15301493
File: 146 KB, 820x1200, leap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15301493

>>15301461
I think they've got nothing on Sappho.

>> No.15302832
File: 2.00 MB, 4160x3120, 1588885821297.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15302832

How do I unspook my midwit father who keeps on shilling me this propaganda piece?
I tried to recommend him an introduction of Darwinian materialism, pic rel starting from left
He's a (mostly senile) STEMfag btw

>> No.15302996

>>15300909
>>15300940
>>15301103
>>15302832
I havent read this book, but the author is jewish so I am sceptical about reading it but nevertheless in spite of this it could still be good now I want one of you to tell me exactly WHY IS IT SHIT? TELL ME WHY, WHAT MAKES THIS BOOK BAD?

>> No.15303011

Amazingly despite OP being retarded the book is still god awful

>> No.15303065

>>15302996
It keeps on trying to deform Smith ideas to conform to the current status quo, try to open Wealth of Nations, you'll be surprised
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1863/theories-surplus-value/ch03.htm