[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 314 KB, 720x726, 1575108892666.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15229258 No.15229258[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>leibniz is correct, we live in the best possible wor-

>> No.15229270

>this is my argument

>> No.15229275

>>15229258
Politics is a joke, how can people attach themselves to this trash in the current year. A surrogate activity if I’ve ever seen one

Books on the clownification of politics?

>> No.15229287

gay, non-white, poor and female conservatives are full on retarded

>> No.15229291

>>15229258
What the fuck does "conservative" even mean in Burgerland? Explain this shit.

>> No.15229311

>>15229287
White cuckservatives are not any better. Especially in the US.

>> No.15229328

>>15229291
It doesn’t mean anything, they’re just as degenerate and are at most five years behind the liberals, always losing. They exclusively play defense. They’re pathetic

>> No.15229346

>>15229291
It's a label bro. A lifestyle. Somethin you identify with.

>> No.15229359

>>15229258
Drag queens are always disgusting no matter what.

>> No.15229433

>>15229291
Right-liberal market fundamentalists. Usually christians or w/e orthodox. Reactionary xenophobic nationalists.
They’re extremists. There’s maybe a hundred actual conservatives in the country.

>> No.15229443

>>15229291
It means you identity with elephant tribe, as opposed to "liberals" who identity with donkey tribe.

>> No.15229455

>>15229433
1/10 quality post
Get your head examined, you dumb cunt

>> No.15229456

>>15229258

I dont think Leibniz thinks much about human agency when it comes to his argument of BPW.

Also, the argument is flawed because he says that there is an infinite number of BPW, which means that there must be BPW's ahead of ours, so we are just a pearl in his infinite BPW necklace.

>> No.15229463

>>15229291
american conservatives are basically progressive liberals when compared to the average muslim

>> No.15229464

>>15229433
staggeringly stupid take as usual.

>> No.15229474

>>15229433
They don't sound too extreme. Radical Is lslam is my idea of right-wing extremism.

>> No.15229494

>>15229433
Has there ever been a tripfag that isn't a complete retard?

>> No.15229516

>>15229474
I mention them as orthodox, but they’re not such a large group. Muslims raise kids in the US to become left-liberals

>>15229455
>>15229464
I’m talking to a non-burger, so you MAGA heads can just shut your mouths

>> No.15229537

>>15229456
There is only one BPW, but there is an infinity of possible worlds.

>> No.15229541

>>15229516
I said Radical Islam, not just generic Muslims, though. Learn to read, sweaty.

>> No.15229544

>>15229258
we still have free will though

>> No.15229559

>>15229516
>Muslims raise kids in the US to become left-liberals
then ISIS has a point saying they're not Muslims at all

>> No.15229571

>>15229433
Shiggy

>> No.15229579

>>15229328
>>15229443
this

>> No.15229580

>>15229541
Only market fundies and christian fundies come out of the US rightwing. There’s practically no islamic fundies here, and that’s where we’re talking about. The US “conservative”. They are extremists and many of them are on the verge radicalism as evidenced by all the domestic terrorism they do.
Learn to read, and write, sweetie

>> No.15229600

>>15229559
US ISIS are straight up CIA handlers in masks. But their a foreign legion made up of Iraqis, Pakis, Europeans, etc.

>> No.15229607

>>15229580
I thought the "salt-right" was Burgerland's version of radicalism. Plain conservatives just whine about muh mexicans muh democrats and other nonsense. Either way, none of these would be considered radical outside of the US, sweaty.

>> No.15229640

>>15229607
Again, I’m not all that sweaty right now.

The “alt-right” was a rising racist contingent of the nationalist section. Becoming more fascist in its ideology they needed a more sanitary label. So the great marketing minds of liberals came up with alt-right. This is an extremist group, clowns they may be. Some may murder and get carted off to the penalty box, but they are much beloved for distracting the rising lefty kids

>> No.15229660

>>15229640
>The “alt-right” was a rising racist contingent of the nationalist section
I'm pretty sure that a bunch of pseudonymous internet nerds like SuperLutheran and BAP do not count as any section of the Republican Party. The only members of the alt-right to show their faces on a regular basis are James Allsup and Richard Spencer, and neither are friendly with conservatives.

Also, they called themselves alt-right. Now they call themselves the dissident right.

>> No.15229665

>>15229640
>Again, I’m not all that sweaty right now
>2020, 4chan(nel)
>bitching about meme spellings
That's a yikes from me, sweaty.
>The “alt-right” was a rising racist contingent of the nationalist section. Becoming more fascist in its ideology they needed a more sanitary label. So the great marketing minds of liberals came up with alt-right. This is an extremist group, clowns they may be. Some may murder and get carted off to the penalty box, but they are much beloved for distracting the rising lefty kids
ah ok

>> No.15229693

>>15229537

almost a fair point, but if there is an infinity of PW's then their can be no definitive world which is the best.

>> No.15229712

>>15229660
>and neither are friendly with conservatives.
That’s what I’m saying. Not a part of the Republican party, which has been long since bought out and called “neoconservatives” (same as the DNC) and they’re considered extremist rightwing and don’t agree with each other
> the dissident right.
Hahah. Cuz “Kekastan” was too ironic.

>> No.15229732
File: 70 KB, 642x749, 1479115540512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15229732

Literally every trad society in history had a community of people engaging in homosexuality. Forget antiquity, just look at Victorian England. The ones cracking down homosexuality it are puritan reformists - early christians, prots, wahhabists, nazis, etc. None of these people are conservatives.

>> No.15229757

>>15229433
Just fuck off already

>> No.15229771

>>15229712
US politics are a meme. People over there believe that if you cut your nuts off as well as your dick then you are a woman. The conservatives are not even conservatives. Dems and Reps are both just conservative liberals. The left is non-existent outside anomalies like Bernie (who got fucked by the establishment --again). Fucking mess.

>> No.15229777

>>15229771
>oops I endorsed the establishment

>> No.15229779
File: 121 KB, 1048x410, CTEPAykWUAACAQI.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15229779

>>15229660
>The only members of the alt-right to show their faces on a regular basis are James Allsup and Richard Spencer, and neither are friendly with conservatives.
Yeah...

>> No.15229780

>>15229291
More money for Israel and Big Business!

>> No.15229790

>>15229779
How does this make sense when injuns were trannies and niggers make little boys suck old man penis for the power cum

>> No.15229793

>>15229779
That's from 7 years ago. He tweeted he regretted voting for Trump recently (I think it was after the Iran mess).

>> No.15229802

>>15229790
The Greeks were into gay stuff including hebephilia. Not exclusively but they were.

>> No.15229803

disgusting.

>> No.15229806

>>15229793
Regretting voting for zion don doesn't say anything about his position on homosexuality

>> No.15229813

>>15229806
So what are you saying here exactly?

>> No.15229823

>>15229443
Based anthropogist

>> No.15229829

>>15229813
That the alt-right unironically supports homosexuality

>> No.15229840

>>15229802
How the fuck is hebephillia gay it's literally biological attraction to fertile young women.

>> No.15229846

>>15229291
it's literally just aesthetics

>> No.15229851

>>15229328
What's funny is DSA types say this exact same thing about the party's Clintonite wing. And here in the UK it's a common criticism levelled at Blairites and the soft-left by Corbynites. The liberals are cucking everyone at once.

>> No.15229858

>>15229840
I obviously meant homosexual hebephilia i.e. they fucked pubescent boys.

>> No.15229870

>>15229829
So you're confirming they aren't friendly with traditional conservatives?

>> No.15229883

>>15229858
That's called pedaresty and was less common than Christian propaganda has led you to believe. Even so, how does that make faggotry a white person phenomenon? Fagoots are everywhere. More common among shitskins actually.

>> No.15229897

>>15229258
>demon showing his full power
>demon acting innocent, trying to lure you in, so he can eat you.

>> No.15229900

>>15229287
Female conservatives are awesome because they don't go with the flow. They have equal rights, now what do they want? A better world for their male partners.

>> No.15229912

>>15229258
Somebody explain to me how drag queens ended up representing mainstream conservatism?

>> No.15229921

>>15229912
only in america

>> No.15229925

>>15229883
>That's called pedaresty and was less common than Christian propaganda has led you to believe
They still practiced it, don't they?
>Even so, how does that make faggotry a white person phenomenon?
Progress. Enlightenment. Aesthetics beyond morals. Boosting will and drive. Challenging nature. All European hallmarks.
>Fagoots are everywhere. More common among shitskins actually.
Homosexuality is a European trademark. You can't take that from Europeans.

>> No.15229934

>>15229925
greeks aren't europeans, in fact all south "euros" aren't actually Europeans

>> No.15229952

>>15229870
"Traditional conservatives" like the city dwelling cuckservatives or the illiterate rednecks who inhabit the countrysides? Because the former is tolerating homosexuality more year by year, while the latter aren't even a real threat.

>>15229897
>you not taking your pills

>>15229934
Having male lovers was commonplace in ancient Rome.

>> No.15229964

>>15229328
>>15229291
Politics has never really been anything but aesthetics.

>> No.15229972

>>15229952
> Having male lovers was commonplace in ancient Rome
yes, and R*mans and G*eeks aren't Europeans, they're Anatolian, Mediterranean, Arab, mutts. they fought against the true Europeans.

>> No.15229974

>>15229433
I fucking wish cuckservstives were even a fifth as reactionary, xenophobic, or nationalistic as you seem to think they are. They're just liberals, no hyphenation is necessary.

>> No.15229976

>>15229934
>Europeans: Whoa we're so proud of the Greeks, they were the cornerstone of Europe! Greek philosophy is great! Best Europeans!
>Also Europeans: Greeks aren't Europeans. Only non-degenerste men can be called European even though the word "Europe" itself is of Greek origin! Greeks are subhuman degenerates! Did you hear they were kind of brown? Ew!
Get it right. They're only Euros when what they said or did agrees with your ideology. They either are or they aren't European.

>> No.15229988

>>15229976
>They either are or they aren't European
Final decision, they aren't Europeans.

>> No.15230009
File: 2.20 MB, 1024x1152, soy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15230009

>>15229972
Go to bed Varg. You will never found Europe.

>> No.15230013

>>15229851
No, it's only that all these parties are nothing more than camps within Liberalism, which is a secular humanist ideology of the Late Renaissance and Early Enlightenment. The very idea of left an right is a novelty of the post-Revolution, French Tennis Court.

>> No.15230036

>>15230009
>3 kikes and a thai twink
Ok schlomo

>> No.15230046

>>15230036
if thats the case, then the majority of "white" americans look like kikes.

>> No.15230048

>>15229972
>European = White
lol

>> No.15230051

>>15230046
Well it is muttland

>> No.15230158

>>15230013
do elaborate

>> No.15230266

>>15230158
This is commonly known history, readily recognized by all opponents to Liberalism, but ignored by proponents. Dugin and Foucault both explain it in their own way. Or, if you want a Traditional Catholic take, read Revolution and Counter Revolution. The truth is found in the word itself--Liberal, of or pertaining to freedom. After several generations of wealth and prosperity for European nobility who were reading Greek and Roman mythology and philosophy, there became an increasing sense that Christian morality and theology were limiting, that man was not fallen and broken and inclined to evil, but that he was born good and corrupted by society; therefore, social norms should be more liberal and permissive. This itself has some roots in the Protestant revolt, which begrudged the Roman ecclesiarchy. Ever since, the motivating principle has been that an increase in freedom is good. The difference between what we call Liberal and Conservative today is nothing more than a disagreement on speed and totality. But, as the principle is always towards greater liberality, no conservative hesitation really amounts to anything in the long run. And before anyone counters by suggesting this is a slippery slope fallacy, the core belief of Liberalism is intentionally to introduce a slippery slope into Christian thought.

>> No.15230268
File: 65 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15230268

>>15229287
Not gay but blocks your path

>> No.15230279

>>15229291
For most people it means non progressive liberal. The neocons won.

>> No.15230284

I maintain that we live in the worst possible world.

>> No.15230386

>>15230266
so is there any hope of arresting liberalism's advance? can anything even exist outside of liberalism at this stage?

>> No.15230398

>>15229291
low taxes

>> No.15230460

>>15230386
Nick Fuentes is the way

>> No.15230489

>>15229660
The only person who still calls himself "alt-right" is Dicky Spencer, because it's a term he coined, and his ego can't accept the fact that his movement is dead and nobody wants to associate with the brand.

>>15229712
>Hahah. Cuz “Kekastan” was too ironic.
You are so far out of your depth lol.

>> No.15230511

>>15229275
Not a book but there was an episode of Tales from the Dark side called "if the shoes fit" that might be up your alley.

>> No.15230533

>>15230268
Have you heard this woman speak?

>> No.15230546

>>15230460
>Literal youtube child

Zoomers are so fucking stupid

>> No.15230603

>>15229291
I don't know, but looking at OP's pic, the only difference between the American Right and Left at this point is aesthetics.

>> No.15230703

>>15229291
It's a mostly meaningless label, they just act as brakes on what the democrats want. It ranges from protestant fundies to "classical liberal" gun nuts to paleocons who want Euro style nationalism. The democrats always win in the end, however.

>> No.15230867

>>15230386
An absurd question. Liberalism is based on fundamentally false assumptions about natural law. It's illusory. God permits divine law to be trampled, but natural law cannot be contravened. This is why I say politics is aesthetics. The realities of power and resources and information and so on, these are fundamental. Regardless of human attempts, our society regularly develops back to the natural form. All that changes is the artifice we use to speak about it. Monarchies are not to be preferred to democracies because Kings are better than Presidents, but because it is better for the King to be known than unknown.