/lit/ - Literature

>>15117901
If its wrong to want to fuck that stone cold statue bubble butt I don't want to be right

>>15117901
Also books on strategies and tactics

>>15117912
it's not wrong, it's just pleb. There is a direct line of descent from baroque sculpture to GQ models. Better stick with Michelangelo

>>15117912
You fill in love with the imitation, not the thing-in-itself, the idea, you irremediable plebeian.

>>15117964
>posting lacan
>doesn't realise rule number 1: the woman does not exist
>doesn't realise rule number 2: there is no sexual relationship
whoever the fuck mentioned love, you soppy sack of shit

>>15117912
>>15117940
>>15117964
>>15118008


Let’s focus on the asked book question shall we

>>15118035
You should know by now that posting anything remotely sexual will activate that part of a coomer's brain which makes him want to comment on and jack off to it. You brought this derailment on yourself

>>15118008
>whoever the fuck mentioned love, you soppy sack of shit

>>15118035

>>15117940
What is patrician sculpture ass pls

>>15118035
Just shoot your opponents in the head. You win.

>>15118094
The Venus Callipyge of Naples. Its not really amenable to creepshots like the OP's though, and that's for the better

>>15118035
this thread is obviously not about books

>>15117901
>Are their any good books that focus or having a better argument and debate
>Anything that can help win an argument
So do you want a book that helps you have good arguments, or do you want a book that helps you win arguments? Do you want to ensure you reach the truth, or do you want to ensure people perceive you as being correct? These are far less connected than you seem to think, and it's just a little concerning how easily you inflate these ideas.

>>15117901

anon, you should be trying to educate yourself to avoid arguments in the first place
if you're actively trying to win one for the sake of it you're already too far gone