[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 120 KB, 744x806, literature.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022094 No.15022094 [Reply] [Original]

Does /lit/ pass the female filter test?

>> No.15022105

it seems like this post was designed to peeve /lit/. all I can say is based

>> No.15022106
File: 19 KB, 439x365, weird preferences.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022106

>>15022094
Every woman on that sub is fat and ugly btw

>> No.15022109

>>15022094
I like Aristotle and Mishima. I wonder what her opinion on Lasch is

>> No.15022122

>>15022109
>sci/fi & fantasy, okay
>Aristotle, run
wtf

>> No.15022123

>>15022094
which unlovable slag wrote this? I shall be the lightning bolt

>> No.15022133

>>15022094
>be a little wary if it's something by a female author because he's probably lying and trying to fuck you
>favorite book is middlemarch

half the non-/lit/heads i talk to don't even know who george eliot is so unless they'd probably think she's a guy

>> No.15022135
File: 162 KB, 680x717, 88AA3742-7B82-49C4-8B93-318FB944932E.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022135

>>15022094
>tfw into Mishima, Aristotle, Nietzsche and am into WWII
Good thing I’m not a simp

>> No.15022136

>>15022094
these retards remind me of redpill guys. They make autistic lists like this and pretend they vet everyone and then in reality the first guy/girl that seduces them they fall for completely regardless of their supposed checklist

>> No.15022140
File: 30 KB, 834x86, thinking.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022140

>> No.15022142

>>15022094
>>15022106
sounds like astrology, as if searching for signs in the stars. There should be a more complicated touchstone for selecting a partner

>> No.15022145
File: 76 KB, 850x400, 1D98F259-225E-499E-9049-D637DD67C844.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022145

>>15022122
Aristotle speaks too many uncomfortable truths about women and slavery for them

>> No.15022149
File: 27 KB, 667x199, stupid roastie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022149

>>15022094
>>15022094
This should answer all of your questions about women and reading literature.

>> No.15022151

>>15022094
this is the female version of autism.

>> No.15022154
File: 48 KB, 589x428, the female version of those guys who talk about trad wives.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022154

>>15022136

>> No.15022156

>>15022140
>jordan peterson and joe rogan as instablocks
based
>foucault
so she's instablocking basically everyone in my university's english department

>> No.15022164

>>15022154
half of these things are based but i'd bet it comes from bluepilled thinking

>> No.15022168
File: 25 KB, 816x242, wtf u have a deadbeat dad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022168

>>15022164

>> No.15022169

>>15022094
What if I love Aristotle's ethics but hate his politics?

>> No.15022177
File: 14 KB, 667x79, god help us.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022177

Do you enjoy African American literature /lit/?

>> No.15022182

>>15022156
the point is she seems to think there is some connection between Rogan and Foucault/Derrida

>> No.15022187

>>15022135
literally me

>> No.15022188

>>15022168
>never met his dad
>has children below the age of 10

Why does she hate blacks?

>> No.15022191

>>15022094
>Giving only 2 lines to ruslit
That bitch sure didn't pass mine.

>> No.15022193

>>15022094
She's going to be single for a while.

>> No.15022194

>>15022094
This post is clearly bait since it was posted by a new account.

But honestly this subreddit is showing me how cringe redpill ideology can be by showing me it's female counterpart.

>> No.15022195

the OP in that thread is pretty based for making people insecure about reading garbage or not reading at all. of course, it's not nearly enough to have any self-insight

>> No.15022202
File: 54 KB, 724x552, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022202

>>15022094
This place is like it's own little chamber of hell, an echo chamber of sexually frustrated, bitchy, busted women. It's like /lit/ but somehow much worse.

>> No.15022203

>>15022106
the only one I fail is watching porn and playing video games. how come women aren't crawling at my feet bros?

>> No.15022206

>>15022202
lol based op probably browses here

>> No.15022207

>>15022094
>Kant and Hegel is generally okay
If I were female I would take pains to avoid anyone who reads Kant or Hegel.

>> No.15022209

whenever I'm tempted to move back to the west all I have to do is remind myself how shit white women are. what exactly happened to create the worst group of people human history has ever seen?

>> No.15022211
File: 90 KB, 960x948, 1586041422168.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022211

>>15022094
Why do women have such SHIT taste in literature and art?

>> No.15022212

>>15022169
It means you’re cringe

>> No.15022225

>>15022203
because you watch porn and play videogames

>> No.15022227
File: 74 KB, 661x431, based femoid blowing out the pseuds.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022227

>> No.15022232

>>15022227
not blown out, he probably already fucked her

>> No.15022234

>>15022202
if you took the userbase of /lit/ and somehow forced us all to make a subreddit together with liek 10 people randomly chosen as mods the result would be absolutely horrific

>> No.15022242

>>15022232
kek'd

>> No.15022246
File: 593 KB, 769x1024, 10FA2837-61CD-4BE1-8A54-80CACD13FD4B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022246

>>15022094
Does Mishima make all females seethe this hard?

>> No.15022247

>>15022094
Based. I pass.

>> No.15022248

>>15022202
>i just read a whole fucking lot; it's just not in a book, so
mfw that probably means she just reads twitter a lot

>> No.15022261

>>15022094
>Hegel
>Ok
Yikes

>> No.15022262

I can’t imagine being in such a position where this would be helpful filter.

I struggle to meet to people who read let alone people who have read books and subjects like that

>> No.15022279

>cant be interested in the most recent big conflict that set the course of modern history, or the most influential and long lasting one in history.

let me guess.
NAZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS
this chick has never had one meaningful relationship im betting right now.

>> No.15022286

>>15022154
>80% (or more) of his friends are female
I'm a man, and everyone I now consider a friend is a woman
my two best friends were both men but one was murdered and the other died in a car accident
>tfw you get filtered because all your guy friends died tragic deaths

>> No.15022295

>>15022140
>implying Jordan Peterson would be a Derrida fan

>> No.15022298

>>15022227
Why does this whore thinks she's better than anyone for reading overrated, pop-culture high-school-assigned literature. I have never met a w*man with a personality more valuable than her vagina.

>> No.15022300

>>15022279
>this chick has never had one meaningful relationship im betting right now.
Somehow femcels are even more pathetic than incels

>> No.15022301

>>15022202
>It's like /lit/ but somehow much worse.
At least /lit/ talks about books sometimes.
This is just TRP/MGTOW but for women.

>> No.15022302

is there any book that will help me understand the absolute state of the women in that thread (no meme answers, please)

>> No.15022310

>>15022302
The Bell Jar but she's even more shallow than before (both in tastes and no backstory about her dad dying)

>> No.15022313

>>15022298
Tbf the guy was a pseud

>> No.15022316

I hate women so much its unreal

>> No.15022318

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyWFwVjVIeE

>> No.15022322

>>15022106
Those are some based preferences.

>> No.15022333

>>15022094
>filtered because I'd probably say Marianne Moore's Complete Poems is my favorite book
>FILTERED BECAUSE I ADMIRE A WOMAN

>> No.15022338
File: 838 KB, 1312x1458, Screenshot 2020-04-05 at 03.58.23.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022338

>> No.15022346

>>15022094
Ahahaha, that's fucking brilliant, but sadly too based for reddit standards. Definitely fake.

>>15022279
WW1 was more influential, kiddo. WW2 is popular just because of video games and films.

>> No.15022347

this sub seems way too bad for me to visit even for ""research"" but i'm guessing it's pretty terfy

>> No.15022350

>>15022338
>A woman is whole and complete without you
This is the most cucked and white knight shit I've ever read.

>> No.15022355

>>15022346
>WW1 was more influential, kiddo. WW2 is popular just because of video games and films.
Holy shit the ultimate pseud take

>> No.15022356

there's women that actually shit on focault?
this has slightly restored my faith in them
based OP

>> No.15022364
File: 151 KB, 1762x374, Screenshot 2020-04-05 at 04.03.03.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022364

>>15022350
She is very angry.

>> No.15022371

>>15022355
but muhhh pahl arrbaarr!!!!11 but muh six zillions!!

>> No.15022372

Am I a brainlet if I read Brothers K and didn't take it to be pessimistic? I have read multiple Dostoyevsky books and he doesn't seem like a misanthrope at all

>> No.15022373

>>15022346
ww1 was the death of monarchies and kings. ww2 was the death of nations themselves. what do you think was more influential? did britain remain british after the war? we are seeing the consequences now and it will spark another more devastating conflict soon enough. just like ww1 led to ww2.

>> No.15022375

>>15022094
>>15022106
I pass both. Here are my requirements:
>must be a virgin
>must not be an atheist
>must be above 5'6"
>must read (Bible and religious texts count)

>> No.15022376
File: 410 KB, 1130x1500, 91dQW8VOeYL._AC_SL1500_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022376

who here volcel?

>> No.15022378

>>15022338
why is this gendered

>> No.15022383

>>15022156
found the cuck pseud.

>> No.15022385

>>15022372
it goes no farther than some vague association she got from nowhere in all likelihood

>> No.15022387

>>15022094
I find it hard to believe that guide is not built by fat ugly women and trolls who advice said women

I mean, I was just laughing as I read that, yet at the same time I know the amount of women that read are so scarce, and the ones I know that read read a lot, and havent built a stereotype on who to like or dislike based on their books, at least to not this troll level

>> No.15022388

>>15022364
I can feel the sheer seethe coming through my monitor.

>> No.15022389

>>15022383
i was talking about the faculty but ok

>> No.15022390

>>15022149
She's honest, that's more than most women. Honestly not even that bad anon, you don't date girls for 'connection,' but rather stability or dependency (meaning will they be a good wife?). IK why you think that comment is cringe and gay, but there's hardly anyone that'll meet your expectations in the world if you don't realize that a women like that wouldn't be too bad, granted she's attractive.

>> No.15022396

>>15022338
this is the most pathetic shit I've ever read

>> No.15022399
File: 181 KB, 640x590, 1586044915168.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022399

>>15022373
>ww1 was the death of monarchies and kings. ww2 was the death of nations themselves. what do you think was more influential? did britain remain british after the war? we are seeing the consequences now and it will spark another more devastating conflict soon enough. just like ww1 led to ww2.

>> No.15022407
File: 51 KB, 732x772, 1578250538035.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022407

>>15022399
>>ww1 was the death of monarchies and kings. ww2 was the death of nations themselves. what do you think was more influential? did britain remain british after the war? we are seeing the consequences now and it will spark another more devastating conflict soon enough. just like ww1 led to ww2.

>> No.15022408

>>15022364
so much of that is so blatantly untrue. There are specific ways in which men are shit, but she's attributing to them all the female faults as well

>> No.15022409
File: 9 KB, 221x228, download (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022409

>>15022399
sweet self portrait.

>> No.15022423

>>15022211
"A rise in nationalism"

I'd say leftardism is more of a problem, the true political extremism that creates any significant issue, in addition to pushing many individuals to identify with racist ideologies as they are left to choose between bigotry or or the so called "liberalism" of today's society

>> No.15022424

>>15022371
I'm talking about the economic aftermath and political shakeup after the war.

>> No.15022434
File: 12 KB, 600x800, 1586006239039.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022434

>>15022407
>>>ww1 was the death of monarchies and kings. ww2 was the death of nations themselves. what do you think was more influential? did britain remain british after the war? we are seeing the consequences now and it will spark another more devastating conflict soon enough. just like ww1 led to ww2.

>> No.15022435

>>15022389
>hating joe rogan because you're intellectually insecure, ie a pseud, and because trannies told you to, ie you're a cuck

>> No.15022438

>>15022423
people would rather accept a soft lie than a hard truth.

>> No.15022446

>>15022434
>>15022407
>>15022399
calm the fuck down samefag.

>> No.15022447

>>15022435
>hating joe rogan because you're intellectually insecure
Imagine thinking Joe Regan can make anyone feel intellectually insecure
*hits bong*

>> No.15022448

>>15022435
joseph...

>> No.15022452

>"What kind of books do you like anon?"
"Uhhh I've been reading this contemporary french novelist, Houellebecq. He's very talented and writes on a lot of social issues."
>*checks cunt-approved book list*
>"Oh that's so cool anon :)"

>> No.15022461

>>15022423
Then why are we seeing a rise in nationalism now and we didn't see it in the 60-80 period when leftardism was much more widespread?

>> No.15022463

>>15022182
wym bro? rogan's always talking about foucault. "jamie pull up that passage about cessation of dialogue with the insane"

>> No.15022473

>>15022452
a lot of women would probably like houellebecq. anons don't understand this because they misread him

>> No.15022474

>>15022435
i don't hate joe rogan, but his audience is infested with enlightened radical centrists

>> No.15022478

>>15022447
>being this fucking obtuse
pseuds virtue signal about hating rogan because they think people will think they're smart for saying he's dumb, meanwhile everyone knows he's dumb but people don't listen because they think he's brilliant.

>> No.15022487

>>15022474
confirmed crying cuckold.

>> No.15022488
File: 113 KB, 396x628, 1510693909188.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022488

I ain't reading that nonsense. Essay length Reddit posts are like a drain on the soul.

>> No.15022490

>>15022094
That’s funny but for women in the literary dating scene looking for men in the same scene what’s the sample size? I feel like there’s not a lot of dating going on with nerds.

>> No.15022494

>>15022461
>when leftardism was much more widespread

did you even exist from 2012-now?
how could you possibly say such a naive, wrong thing?
also, to answer, countries were still mostly homogeneous then. easier to pass off those leftist students as wackos and say itll pass. but then they grew up and took official positions. cue the madness today.

>> No.15022495

>>15022168
lol they actually think their 2 week vacation in europe had such a big transformational effect on them that they cant imagine their partner not doing the same

probably force themselves to drink sparkling water

>> No.15022504

>>15022478
continue wasting your time listening to joe rogan because you think a pseud might do otherwise

>> No.15022510

>>15022338

Considering what I know with women and being honest and self-aware, this makes more sense to take as the opposite of true.

>Women are incomplete without a man in their life

To me, it seems, men generally do far better alone than women. More monasteries than nunneries (and monks actually contribute, too).

>> No.15022518
File: 67 KB, 728x783, bd35a56f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022518

Atlas shrugged is based and im not surprised women feel intimidated by Rand

>> No.15022519

>>15022504
Extremely smarted /lit/ poster too intelligent for joe rogan right here. probably working the stock exchange like an alpha hustler instead of listening to joe rogan like a pleb. respect bro.

>> No.15022523

>>15022495
>2 week vacation in europe had such a big transformational effect
I have never understood this shit. I traveled around Thailand for three weeks one time and it didn't change who I was. With rare exceptions, I think that if you come away from a vacation like that you're not much of a person to begin with. It's not like I fucked trannies or something like that, I spent it with my grandfather who lives over there and visited religious temples (though I'm pretty sure he converted to Buddhism, which is funny for a mythaibride.com guy)

>> No.15022524

>>15022376
Just fucking say celibate.

>> No.15022526

>>15022473
I completely disagree. He's a chore to read (I don't mean this in a bad way, but he doesn't follow conventional plot structure or pacing--you have to really push yourself through it) and a misanthrope at best, but undoubtedly a misogynist.

>> No.15022530

>>15022461
Leftardism of that time cannot possibly compare to the one of today. Not to mention that the whole point was to exploit the needs of society to impose leftist ideology i.e. take advantage of social divide and repression to peddle toxic ideology, which I should add, continues to develop 'till today, and further repress the whole intellectual and popular stablishment.

In a sense, you could say many people became leftists then for the same reason many people are starting to become ever more right wing, because they felt like there was no other choice, because they felt no one else was trying to do anything about the social injustice, which at the time I guess I could just bring things up like legal segregation and whatnot.

>> No.15022534

>>15022473
>>15022526
women like bodily, earthy fiction. writing that in every sentence is in touch with the body, with mother earth, with the vagina.

>> No.15022537

>>15022423
>I'd say leftardism is more of a problem

Guess what, the rise of socialism also fits perfectly into that meme.

>> No.15022545

>>15022519
let me know what elon has to say about weed when it wraps up three (3) hours from now

>> No.15022549

>>15022494
>did you even exist from 2012-now?
>how could you possibly say such a naive, wrong thing?
>also, to answer, countries were still mostly
So you don't have any argument I take it? Commie parties were an important political force in all of western europe (whereas now they're basically nonexistent and all the continent has turned rightward) and the 68 was a mass (keyword: "mass") movement that wasn't only composed of "wacko students" but of workers that demanded more labour rights and in general people from all parts of society that had all sort of demands. When have we seen such a big ideological mobilitation since then? Never.

>> No.15022550

>>15022094
>liking Brothers Karamazov means your a pessimistic misanthrope disillusioned by humanity
the fuck? it literally had the opposite message

>> No.15022552

>>15022094

99.999% OF WOMEN DO NOT READ LITERATURE

THEY READ YA FICTION AND ROMANCE NOVELS, THE FORMER BECAUSE IT MAKE THEM SEEM CUTE AND THE LATTER BECAUSE WOMEN ENJOY SELF INSERTION PORNOGRAPHY

Holy FUCK

Women do not care about philosophy or literature for the same reason they do not care about authentic forms of knowledge in general. They do not wish to steer the ship and they do not care for the requisite knowledge to effectively do so

>> No.15022554

>>15022478
*hits bong* yeah fuck dose psoods

>> No.15022565

>>15022552
>they do not care about authentic forms of knowledge in general. They do not wish to steer the ship and they do not care for the requisite knowledge to effectively do so

The interesting part is when they try to convince men to ALSO not care about authentic knowledge.

>> No.15022566

>>15022154
I think I would be content watching this lady fall down 1000 flights of stairs. I think I would welcome refugees into her home and just see how it plays out.

>> No.15022576

>>15022537
The word socialism shouldn't create much of an issue, or socialism itself, and even using it as a pejorative is quite archaich in my opinion, same with using capitalism as a pejorative. We fall into the territory of ideologues if we express ourselves that way.

If anything, if we see that image and it says Nationalism/Socialism/Capitalism it just happens to reveal as lousy propaganda/indoctrination echoes, anyway, I only speak for myself as I try why I meet that image with disgust.

>> No.15022590

russian 19th check: humanity needs to be purged. only 0.01% are conscious beings

>> No.15022591
File: 18 KB, 348x235, ladies.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022591

>>15022364

>> No.15022593

>>15022154
note
>architect
Displays that she learned about good jobs from romantic comedies aka shit written by men kek what a dumb bitch

>> No.15022596

>>15022576
>even using it as a pejorative is quite archaich in my opinion

I did not use it as a pejorative, and that image does not actually imply anything negative about that image. I could see people on both left and right enjoying that meme, albeit for opposing reasons.

I don't see how simply using an appropriate label to discuss the current evolution of ideologies is problematic.

Also, most of the pejorative of such labels comes either from opponents, or from the people who adopt the label themselves. For example, all the people I have met 'IRL' that identify as socialist tend to be the sort of people their opponents characterize them as.

>> No.15022599

>>15022591
Based. I was going to do it myself but I'm too lazy. I hope it ruins her day and she seethes even more.

>> No.15022601

>>15022591
based keep us updated anon

>> No.15022602
File: 50 KB, 728x546, D_MYdmhXsAM1kVn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022602

>>15022591
>/lit/ shoutout
epic win

>> No.15022603

Is life just one big larp for these women?

>> No.15022605

>>15022596
>that image does not actually imply anything negative about that image.

about that 'IDEOLOGY' bleh.

>> No.15022609

>>15022094
>avoid anyone into Foucault
are roasties literally retarded?

>> No.15022610

>>15022106
Literally me

>> No.15022615
File: 806 KB, 2000x1800, BC2B649A-0CAB-44AB-863F-EDB5C484808D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022615

>>15022135
You forgot to mention The Romans king

>> No.15022617

>>15022164
Quit speaking in /pol/ lingo. It’ll do wonders for your thinking.

>> No.15022634

>>15022596
I see in that image a neutral narrator that suddenly takes a very obvious contemporary stance in favour of modern leftist ideologies and ways of expressing oneself that acompany.

Also, prioritizing Nationalism over other political stances and extremist stances, such as religious extremisms for example, kind of sheds light into the type of person who wrote that and their wiring per se.

See the same image, and replace Nationalism with Socialism, and the image sheds light on their author, or switch it with religious extremism, and the author becomes quite obvious, and obviously in lack of the neutral tone needed not to "trigger" or be "problematic" regarding a truly neutral narrative (neutral that it tackles issues yet not from any particular political ideology, which in the case of that image is, Leftism of today or whatever some might want to call it).

Just what I think of course.

>>15022591
I thought this was going to become a cheecky invitation, instead a cheecky insult.

>> No.15022638

>>15022316
Based, me too anon

>> No.15022646

>>15022473
It’s a coin flip dude. I scored a date after recommending a girl Submission but also had a different girl nearly excommunicate me because of how much she hated the fact I recommended her Whatever.

>> No.15022648

>>15022617
It's beyond /Pol/. You just can't get that grudge out of your minuscule skull.

>> No.15022654

>>15022550
>women
>reading comprehension
pick one

>> No.15022656

>>15022634
>Also, prioritizing Nationalism over other political stances and extremist stances, such as religious extremisms for example, kind of sheds light into the type of person who wrote that and their wiring per se.

Yet, based on Marty McFly's expression and the phrase, 'it's a classic' that image could just as well be a /pol/tier nazi excited for the coming 'day of the rope'.

Moreover, it could be just a neutral narrator with the educational bias of the fact that while the rise of the Nazi's is very much focused on in public schools, the rise of the Bolsheviks, which the Nazis were in large part a reaction to, is glossed over. Meme's being meant to resonate with the masses, would mirror this bias.

>> No.15022664

>>15022094
>Durant fan
Because of course.

>> No.15022669

>>15022338
why do people say things that are so obviously untrue. As if clingy gfs/wives arent a thing

>> No.15022671
File: 1020 KB, 2900x2350, 1549551886378.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022671

>>15022094
>Hegel is generally okay
I can't stop laughing that's fucking hilarious. She's gotta be trolling

>> No.15022674

>>15022656
I would argue against excitement, and I would argue that while it would indeed resonate with some mases, it would also not with other mases, the neutral ones, and the more right leaning ones.

I guess my only assertion if I may call it so, it's that this meme carries a flagpole and it waves a flag, and that "triggered" all this extra attention we ended up giving it.

>> No.15022680

>>15022094
Based

>> No.15022684

>>15022338
>also women: No not the heckin robo waifurinos! My pussy is losing value!

>> No.15022685

>>15022684
everybody point and laugh

>> No.15022687

>>15022094
here's the op profile btw
https://www.reddit.com/user/NecessarySpeed4/posts/

>> No.15022709

>>15022687
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskTruFemcels/comments/ftlkr1/anyone_else_have_this_weird_almost_uncanny_valley/
This is the most reasonable I have ever seen an online forum of women be. Are ugly girls basically men? Have they ascended to the ability of rationally examining reality?

>> No.15022712

>>15022687
>>15022709
She's actually married to an veteran who's some weird rural cringe religion. Literally what half of /lit/ wants to larp as

>> No.15022716

>>15022712
I can't believe we found Varg's wife's reddit account

>> No.15022719
File: 37 KB, 398x376, 1580288202871.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022719

>avoid anyone into Aristotle
what the fuck did she mean by this?

>> No.15022727
File: 22 KB, 804x743, 1452551567283.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022727

>>15022094
What if I don't have a "favourite book" ? I've read literally hundreds of them, how am I supposed to choose the "best" one?

I don't want to date some bitter reddit meanie anyway.

>> No.15022730

>>15022712
I kept reading and it got steadily worse and there were also a bunch of men posting(?) and women who were not femcels, i dont really get what that board is, I thought it was a femcel board.

also just look at this post, marvel at it:

Women that pursue (usually in general sense by females tend to approach, solve and deal with conflict/the world) the female imperative (i.e. what benefits the woman to the most optimal degree usually by an extraction of something - in a general/social/cultural sense) at the expense of the male imperative and men. FDS will get you a man and commitment. Most men are responsive to these types, except Red Pills/players/fuckboys/PIMPS etc.

I think "traditionalism" is inherently and (sociopathic-a-ll-y) feminine when you remove religiosity and sexism that were put in place to create balance and 'moral integrity'. FDS is just traditionalism on crack.

I just find it is interesting men are confident they can weed out these women just like a lot of women have an overzealous confidence they can avoid being played. FDS I admit pollutes it by making it so overt, flamboyant and unnatural. Women that exercise FDS in real life with success come off as fairly normal and kind women.

In my experience FDS tactics are organic, covert, and natural. FDS women will learn there techniques DO work, just not how they are going about it. Many men cannot weed these women out, if not are married to them. To men, they are just "feminine women that know what they want."

>> No.15022744

>>15022094
she just named like 70% of books it sounds like the only thing you can read is ozzy osbournes biography and harry potter for her to date you

>> No.15022745 [DELETED] 
File: 38 KB, 657x527, 1470856527004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022745

>>15022687
Should be dox?

>> No.15022748

My favourite book is Lolita, do I pass?

>> No.15022752
File: 38 KB, 657x527, 1470856527004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022752

>>15022687
Should we dox her?

>> No.15022760

>>15022730
What the fuck is FDS?

>> No.15022762

>>15022730
Why is there this implicit attitude that women have to trick high status men into relationships with them? The only conclusion is that this is how she actually conceives of romantic relationships, which is depressing

>> No.15022768

>>15022286
I'm sorry for your loss anon. If it makes you feel any better, most girls I know find guys who can be friends with girls more attractive, it's just insecure hogs like her who can't take it.

>> No.15022774

>>15022140
Yes, because Foucault and Derrida are known for being anti-female!

>> No.15022775

>>15022094
Now i want to meet her and say my favourite book is 120 days of sodom

>> No.15022776

>>15022106
>>15022094
Based women filtering undesirebles
Society working as intended

>> No.15022777

>>15022762
>Why is there this implicit attitude that women have to trick high status men into relationships with them?

Probably because they do. A high status man will likely go after girls fresh out of high school, if he gives it any thought.

>> No.15022778

>>15022149
More women read literature than men, you're just dealing with the female MRAs here.

>> No.15022781

>>15022760
Female Dating Strategy, the reddit board from which the pictures itt are taken I believe

>> No.15022782

>>15022774
Foucault was so anti female he became gay anon, dont you know that?

>> No.15022787

>>15022375
based

>> No.15022789
File: 881 KB, 935x585, 5E07E26A-73EC-4663-9C6A-5E878B5EC2CC.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022789

>>15022094
Would I be filtered if my favorite book was Der Process?

>> No.15022794

>>15022744
Kek

If you get woman-filtered by this, you let your opinions get dictated by /lit/

>> No.15022796

>>15022302
The Culture of Critique

>> No.15022800

>>15022209
Middle-class and better white women are the only group in society raised without any expectations of resilience placed on them. Quite the opposite, really: they're raised to be spoiled housewives who get everything they want, and then they're given the right to desire things and be 'independent'

>> No.15022804

>>15022781
Is it a unified philosophy or more of them sharing what they think has worked?

>> No.15022807
File: 29 KB, 313x499, 515dPsJYTRL._SX311_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022807

>>15022356
>women that shit on Foucault
Have I got a book for you!

>> No.15022811

>>15022094
I studied Greek for two years, all the while bashing my head against declension and conjugation tables, just for some dumb, dilettante whore to filter me for liking Aristotle. How did misogyny ever become socially unacceptable?

>> No.15022816

>>15022202
>It's like /lit/ but somehow much worse.
kek

>> No.15022818

>>15022781
But what does it mean? Is it like pickup for women or femcel shit or it just women talking about their relationship issues? In that post it made it seem like it was some kind of dating technique women use to manipulate men into dating them

>> No.15022825

>>15022811
>caring what women think
I don't even care what my wife thinks, much less some waste of space that spends her days discussing her standards for the boyfriends she isn't finding.

>> No.15022830

>>15022818
>Is it like pickup for women

Seems similar, but since women aren't really the ones who 'pick-up' men, it seems more about how to quickly filter out poor partners.

At least that's the gist I get, since a lot of male pickup shit says shit like 'don't focus on one woman, play the field.'

>> No.15022831

>>15022591
holy based

>> No.15022838

>>15022356
women love focault as they are easily bamboozled as usual.

>> No.15022840

>>15022782
I thought that was a meme, but it turns out that a bunch of mid tier 'feminists' think he's a misogynist. Crazy considering how he was probably one of the biggest contributors to gender theory.

>> No.15022843
File: 295 KB, 675x1024, 5520839349_998c4a344c_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022843

This is why I'm glad the womyns haven't heard of Moravagine yet

>> No.15022852

>>15022840
Freud is one of the noble fathers of leftist culture and tumblerinas think he was an ebil misogynist as well. This dynamic plays everytime someone is ignorant of the historical roots of his ideology. A similar thing is when /pol/tards decry the enlightnement and then bitch about free speech.

>> No.15022864

>>15022106
I scored 100% and broads generally despise me. I am just a hair's breadth away from inceldom. I am skeptical about practical application of this list.

>> No.15022867

The redditor behind that post must be a real specimen...

>> No.15022868

>>15022781
What’s an LVM? They keep talking about it. I thought it was Lonely Virgin Male, but doesn’t make sense in some contexts

>> No.15022871

>>15022868
low value male

>> No.15022874

>>15022106
And they get mad when a dude says he wants a virgin or a girl with only a few bodies. Wtf?

>> No.15022875

>>15022871
Thanks

>> No.15022879
File: 33 KB, 710x540, 115996555334579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022879

>anything by Will and Ariel Durnat then you've find a keeper
>durnat
>find a keeper

>> No.15022881

>>15022154
Not gonna lie this is pretty based, seems like the type of woman you’d have 5+ kids with by your 30s

>> No.15022883

>>15022852
Foucault's entire ideology was anathema to the very being of academia, he literally called out the institution as an instance of power dictating structures of discourse and thought. Some cosmic irony that he is the most cited academic ever.

>> No.15022894

>>15022094
She's actually not wrong.

>> No.15022899

The way most women read books is "book + feminist theory"
Ask any girl who is doing or has done a thesis and guarantee they've all done it on some aspect of females in literature

>> No.15022904

>>15022894
how would you respond to a similar list screening women based on their choices of books they like?

>> No.15022910

>>15022338
>acting extremely entitled

Yeah that's an auto block from me darling

>> No.15022913

>>15022899
Because muh vagina

>> No.15022915

>>15022904
Do young girls even read? I go to a top school and the English major Girl’s favorite books are either some feminist drivel or fucking John Green. If they read anything that’s in the canon that wasn’t assigned to them, then it’s positive

>> No.15022917
File: 47 KB, 960x589, 90146559_127141918886392_6791222079644499968_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022917

>>15022135
yeah uh im thinkin based

all mishima readers get pussy anyway cause were all ripped

>> No.15022916

>>15022364
Female incels lmao

>> No.15022926

>>15022904
I'd call it based as well.

I'd put Harry Potter on the list.

>> No.15022947

>>15022106
I crank it on the daily and have no problems with women. How the fuck would they even know unless you're living together already?

>> No.15022948
File: 91 KB, 750x1000, j2lplilwax621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022948

>So I heard you like to read, Anon. What's your favorite book?

>> No.15022955

>>15022948
An erotic novel i found online about mary shelley's ghost molesting young schoolboys.

>> No.15022958

>>15022789
only if you answered in German like a pretentious fuck, which we know you aren't.

Are you?

>> No.15022969

>>15022140
What ideas are similar between Derrida/Foucalt and Peterson/Rogan? What ideas does Joe Rogan have for that matter?

>> No.15022984 [DELETED] 

>>15022948
Not so much a book my dear, but the essay titled "The Metaphysics Of The Love Of The
Sexes" by Herr Schopenhauer is certainly a favourite work of mine

>> No.15022988
File: 109 KB, 600x455, 1470109369961.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022988

>>15022591

>> No.15022989 [DELETED] 

>>15022948
Not so much a book my dear, but the essay titled "The Metaphysics Of The Love Of The
Sexes" by Herr Schopenhauer contained in the third volume of his magnum opus "The World as Will and Representation" is certainly a favourite work of mine.

>> No.15022991

>>15022948
Not so much a book my dear, but the essay titled "The Metaphysics Of The Love Of The Sexes" by Herr Schopenhauer contained within the third volume of his magnum opus "The World as Will and Representation" is certainly a favourite work of mine.

>> No.15022996

>>15022991
cervical collision assured

>> No.15022997
File: 126 KB, 800x769, 1583996732349.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022997

>>15022106
wtf thats a based list of thing you should reject men for

>> No.15023026

>>15022145
Funny how Aristotle only knew his own civilization, yet his assertion that those rules hold for all mankind is confirmed by current history. Whether in China, India, Japan, primitive societies... Men have ruled, women for the most part have not.

>> No.15023046

For all you anons out there trying to score some game: here's a great (and fun) way to filter out a small undesirable minority of women, that no one has ever used before but I used it in my daily masturbation fantasy sessions and it worked so it's statistically 100% accurate and 2000% foolproof:
Ask the girl what she spends the most time doing on the internet.
If she posts on 4chan, run. If it's browsing reddit or tumblr, then it's likely that she'll fuck you as long as you're above a certain height. Maybe she has ok looks, but is probably bad in bed. If it's POSTING on reddit or tumblr, then she's an insecure bitch and the stat-check is even easier and she's probably freakier in bed but also uglier.
If she spends the most time on discord, then walk away if she doesn't want to fuck after the first meeting because these ones either fuck you immediately or keep you around as orbiters. This is epitomised in twitch E-thots and their army of beta donators. For vidya, same thing as discord. Walk away.

>> No.15023069

>caring what wh*te women think

>> No.15023070

>>15022955
Post it

>> No.15023079

>>15022709
Don’t forget https://www.reddit.com/r/Trufemcels/
The one you linked is open forums for asking female incels this one is no boys allowed but either way it’s always so interesting to listen to women who can’t get laid talk especially when they talk shit about other women

>> No.15023083
File: 182 KB, 809x1024, Categorically Cute.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023083

>>15022094
>Immanuel "if a woman gets raped, then it would be morally be better for her to kill herself then and there than live" Kant
>generally okay
I would think that Kant would receive the same sort of vociferous denouncement that Aristotle was getting here.

>> No.15023096

>>15022094
I actually really like Mary Shelly's Frankenstein, and find that most female authors are fucking trash; especially at dialogue.

>> No.15023100

>>15022202
Confirmed Butterfly

>> No.15023106

>>15022094
I'm nowhere on here

>> No.15023110
File: 89 KB, 443x455, BFD04143-E6F3-4F8E-93C5-3F18A8D491F0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023110

>>15022474
>someone isn’t a leftist

NOOOOOO HES AN ENLIGHTENED CENTRIST NOOOOOOOO

>> No.15023122
File: 103 KB, 1024x993, BC57EE50-839E-4C85-A7DF-DDDC4377A04B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023122

>>15022591

>> No.15023135

>>15022094
This is such a strange false flag.

>> No.15023142

>>15022133
People who ask who you're favorite author either absolutely know who George Eliot is or expect you to say Harry Potter.

>> No.15023150

If you really want to get in a girl's pants read Raymond Carver

>> No.15023153

>>15022881
Nah:
>do it in your free time
The kind of broad that talks about things like that before she is even involved with someone is the kind of broad that will destroy all of your free time.
>dress like I tell you
>do not tell me how to dress
There are some solid red flags if you read a bit below the surface. She's a cunt.

>> No.15023154

>>15022094
I can kinda understand this, but Pynchon, Foucault, and Derrida make no sense to me.

>> No.15023162

>>15022135
>into Mishima
>not a simp
Sure thing.

>> No.15023165
File: 78 KB, 680x379, with a chariot you can go anywhere.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023165

>>15022852
The Germanic peoples had a rough sort of egalitarianism and freedom of speech that predated the Enlightenment. So did some of the Greek states.

>> No.15023173

>>15022881
She wouldn't let you touch her past the first kid.

>> No.15023176

>>15022883
>Some cosmic irony that he is the most cited academic ever.
I really doubt that.

>> No.15023180

>>15022094
I feel like Pynchon does not fit in with the other authors he's listed alongside

>> No.15023181

>>15022915
>Do young girls even read?
Do men or boys of any age read? I know one guy who reads (and /lit/ certainly doesn't read).

>> No.15023186

>>15022094
She's actually right imo

>> No.15023187

>>15022991
Maximum cringe.

>> No.15023188

>>15022094
The Aristotle specialist where I did undergrad was a woman.

>> No.15023189

>>15022133
>Who's your favorite author?
>George Eliot
>Who's your favorite female author?

>> No.15023191
File: 53 KB, 516x456, most cited authors in Sociology_ Urban Demographics Blog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023191

>>15023176

>> No.15023192

>>15023079
look at this:

especially the pretty little girls who skip the awkward stage and get to be charismatic, bubbly and outgoing all the way from preschool to high school. their life is going to be a damn ocean breeze and a constant flow of validation and they don't even know it yet. (yes there are outliers, but in general)

i used to babysit one of these girls. despite being an adult i'd compare myself to a literal child and feel so sad. like i'd compare my child self vs her. her singing and dancing (and being good at it too) vs me sitting quietly in the corner. her constant laughter vs me trying not to smile at all because my teeth were horrible. her having the cutest wardrobe and experimenting with fashion vs me rotating between the same 2 worn out oversized hoodies out of self hatred. her talking about the boys who have a crush on her vs me realizing already at age 7 that i'm invisible and gross to them.

--------
very funny example for the fact that genetics are more important that upbringing

>> No.15023193
File: 134 KB, 1200x630, 1581703325061.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023193

>A Passage to India
How'd I do, litsluts? Would you fuck me?

>> No.15023203

>>15022969
I doubt any, but if Rogan has mentioned Derrida or Foucault, then that may work. Peterson has mentioned Derrida and Foucault only to deride them as Marxists, so I doubt anyone who likes Peterson would also like them.

>> No.15023204

>>15023187
Thanks that was the intent

>> No.15023206

>>15022106
>>15022094
I pass both of these tests. Where’s my litfu peasants?

>> No.15023208
File: 34 KB, 400x498, truefemcels black woman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023208

>>15023192
>Face reveal...I guess. Honestly this is the only photo of me I've ever liked. Is it even possible for me to looksmax?

>> No.15023211

>>15023191
The infographic is positively ancient and working with an incomplete corpus, but I'm still genuinely shocked. Bourdieu is less shocking, but still surprising.

>> No.15023218

>>15023211
I'm surprised there's no Marx, probably not a good infographic but you get the idea

>> No.15023228

>>15023070
I'm sorry anon but The Modern Blowmethius isnt real, i made it up to disgusts the hypothetical roastie in anon's post.

>> No.15023234

>>15022778
>more women read literature than men
gonna need a sources on that. Crime and contemporary shit is not litterature

>> No.15023235

>there is no male filter test because women all read the same horse shit: harry potter, young adult fiction and feminist novels

>> No.15023242
File: 50 KB, 888x894, 1562265976815.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023242

Women are subhuman desu

>> No.15023247

>>15022094
What’s wrong with Pynchon? These dumb fucking broads.

>> No.15023249

>>15022106
I wonder in what ways she’s improved herself? I wonder what she has to offer her dream man?

>> No.15023262

>>15022338
that is some good coping

>> No.15023265 [DELETED] 

>>15022094
>if he’s into any major 19th century Russian literature e.g. the Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Doso[y]evsky then he’s most likely a pessimistic misanthrope disillusioned by humanity
That’s me.

>> No.15023266

the thumbs up to Dickens is... kinda based?

>> No.15023271
File: 2.23 MB, 3273x4096, _.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023271

Ok, what the fuck is an LVM and what does FDS stand for? I tried looking at the sub but it seems it's private and I don't have a plebbit account.
Fill me up brehs.

>> No.15023276

>>15023271
Love Vroomin’ Motorvehicles and Fuckin’ Deep Shit respectively. RTFM.

>> No.15023279

>>15023271
I want to tongue Alita's asshole desu

>> No.15023283

>>15023271
Low Value Men/Man and Female Dating Strategy

>> No.15023298

>>15023283
Why would someone want to be a “High-Value Man” when he could simply be a lecherous manipulator? Dogbrains.

>> No.15023304

>>15022338
Sounds like he's into BDSM

>> No.15023316

>Female losers produce the exact same kind of philosophy of their male counterparts
Looks like Nietzsche really was right huh

>> No.15023319

>>15023316
So’s Schopenhauer.

>> No.15023332

>>15022094
Major XIX century Russian literature "like Dostoyevskiy" is anything but misanthropic.

>> No.15023339

>>15022338
Posted by a virgin who've never been closer than 2 meters to a woman.

>> No.15023346

If you look at this new incarnation of The View and have any reaction other than “okay, sugartits,” you’re lost.

>> No.15023351

>>15022591
Holy fuck. This literally cracked me up.

>> No.15023360

>>15023298
My thoughts exactly. Why not game the system?

>> No.15023371

>>15023360
It’s not even gaming the system. That IS the system.
Nobody has ever gotten my dick chubby by having sensible habits and tastes, literally the only thing that matters in relationships is how the person smells and what their eyes look like.

>> No.15023389

>>15022094

> "So what is your favourite book, anon?"
> "Are you retarded, my dear? No, this is not a book title - a missed opportunity undoubtedly; see, one may have favourite panties, favourite footnote or favourite cloud provider, even favourite medieval animal, aber Man kann kein Lieblingsbuch haben -- I do hope you noticed the capitalization of "man", dear.
> "Oh, anon, you are so.. so..". [Furiously checks notes] "... Henry Higgins, just you wait.."
> Rides into the sunset humming: "I know something about love, you've gotta want it bad..."
> Proceeds to fsck according to lizard brain recommendation list.
> Curtains.

>> No.15023395

>>15022094
Last conversation I had with an art thot, she didn’t know who Flannery O’Connor was. Go fuck.

>> No.15023410

>>15022169
You don’t need to form nuanced opinions, Anon. just pick a philosopher you’d like to be identified with, read their Wikipedia, and then use it to impress to girls.

>> No.15023413

>>15023154
Are you female?

>> No.15023421
File: 93 KB, 900x300, PBF214-Hard_Read.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023421

>>15022227

>> No.15023426

>>15022203
You have to actually talk to one first

>> No.15023439
File: 101 KB, 899x1124, 1585456445008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023439

>>15023191
it's sociology.

>> No.15023441

>>15023191
>>15023211
>>15023218
It's limited to people "registered" at Google Scholar.

>> No.15023451

>>15022094
The woman who wrote that post doesn't read. And if she does, it's only yo appear smart.

>> No.15023457

>>15023371
>literally the only thing that matters in relationships is how the person smells and what their eyes look like
Extremely based.

All talk of personality and "what's inside" are the rings we jump through to rationalise to ourselves and signal others that we are not wholly acting on biological imperatives. Even purported attraction to another's intellect or whatever bullshit we spout about their personality is because we subconsciously hope that it gets passed on to our offspring.

>> No.15023469

>>15022094
What the fuck I love every author I am not supposed too. Also 2 shelves of classic sci fi. Do woman really think that way?

>> No.15023471

>>15022490
First conversation I had with my boyfriend was about poetry (Eliot >>>), I think quite a few people do find partners in literary circles, but they're usually friends first.

>> No.15023476
File: 304 KB, 1920x1080, Elliot-Rodger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023476

>>15023471
>Eliot >>>
then why did he go crazy like that?

>> No.15023478

>>15023451
This

>> No.15023495

>>15023234
I'm not OP but English Literature courses are dominated by women at all levels: https://www.amacad.org/humanities-indicators/higher-education/gender-distribution-degrees-english-language-and-literature

>> No.15023500

>>15022202
Everything has got to be entertainment

>> No.15023502

>>15023469
Not ones that you would want to date

>> No.15023503
File: 283 KB, 659x652, algebraic geometry, by robin hartshorne.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023503

>30yo kissless virgin
>favourite book is pic related
What the fuck brehs I thought I passed the filter!?

>> No.15023506

>Basing your taste in art around what will get you pussy
There's nothing more pathetic than this, honestly.

>> No.15023514

>>15023503
>t. giga sperg
No one likes turbo autists.
My condolences.

>> No.15023515

>>15023503
wow you sound so different and smart, anon

>> No.15023518

>>15023503
Your pic has an anime girl and you think the problem is the books you read?

>> No.15023526

>>15022094
Dickens is a shit author

>> No.15023534

>>15022094
Written probably by a man but the post is right. You won’t date an incel, manchild or boring cunt

>> No.15023535

>>15023518
Worst of all worlds huh?

>> No.15023543

>>15023534
>Written probably by a man
The part that gives it away is the appeal to "art fundamentals and the old masters."

>> No.15023544

>>15022154
These people are psychopaths

>> No.15023551

That subreddit is live reverse /r9k/, nice.

>> No.15023565

>>15023544
They’re probably just hurt women, same as incels are just hurt men. They deserve to be pitied and to have their navels kissed, but we live in a world powered by resentment, so I guess it’s just gay fucking e-insults then.

>> No.15023598

https://www.reddit.com/r/Trufemcels/comments/fudkfs/they_dont_want_to_have_sex_with_you_but_hey_they/

It’s literally the same dialogue I see incels having. How bizarre.

>> No.15023602
File: 382 KB, 1280x1280, Three_by_Three_(3x3)_Square_Collage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023602

>>15022094
I wonder what she'd think about my list

>> No.15023608

>a man must conform %100 to my neoliberal views or otherwise I wont date him

This is why these cunts get to 35 and will settle for literally everything only to get pump and dumped by MILF fetishists only to do lesbo afterwards

>> No.15023609

>>15023598
This entire thing has to be satire, otherwise, it's brilliant.
>>15023602
That you lack taste and only follow trends, in this case, of the literature board from a vietnamese subterranean-tunnel building forum.

>> No.15023614

>>15023609
>Bohm-Bawerk has ever been a trend on /lit/
yeah, nah

>> No.15023631

>>15023598
>Bawwww only two men asked me out this month and my ex has a new gf that's cuter than me why am I so alooooonee ;_;
lol.

>> No.15023654
File: 67 KB, 250x176, skin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023654

>>15022094
B-but I genuinely like Marguerite Yourcenar, please don't leave me

>> No.15023674

>>15022991
Certifiably based and high IQ chad

>> No.15023678

>>15023565
>They deserve to be pitied and to have their navels kissed
Based anon of compassion and forgiveness

>> No.15023679

The kind of discourse posted here has made me confirm my deepest fears; that I am not cut out to ever find any kind of companionship in this life.

>> No.15023683

>>15022094
>the absolute belligerent state of american sex-relations
A nation of used car salesmen whose global cultural hegemony has been a disaster for the human race.

>> No.15023690

>>15022094
I pass the philosophy test at least

>> No.15023700
File: 172 KB, 750x514, 1570970329965.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023700

>>15022106

>> No.15023703

>>15023700
Olive = btfo

>> No.15023712

>>15022881

>seems like the type of woman

Really? Reads rather more like the kind of women who ends up miserable and alone in her 40s but still thinking she can have kids and settle down. Roastie is all used up - both physical beauty (if she ever had any to begin with) as well as social value to another.

>> No.15023741

>>15022154
These women seem oddly wholesome tbqh.

>> No.15023800

>>15023654
Are women into Yourcenar? I know they have this fascination with homosexual men.

>> No.15023803

>>15023046
>Only hunt for normies
Coward.
If she posting on 4ch imma have a car wreck of a relationship. God I hope she does crack

>> No.15023809

>>15023208
Woman was born to clean toulets

>> No.15023811

>>15022338
Males like these are worse than literal cucks

>> No.15023884
File: 221 KB, 731x1024, EUQ6D8JXkAMoblJ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15023884

>>15022948
S-Storm of Steel by Ernst...J-Junger...

>> No.15023896

>>15023700
>old school thot patrol

>> No.15023916

>>15022364
Why then do these w*men despise things that make men men and send women into the kitchen? Men are turning into children because of this equalist gospel. Hello?

>> No.15023921

>>15022338
It seems like an inversion of old, traditional values.

>> No.15023940

>>15022106
fuuuu if I didn't play vidya I could have dated this hambeast and added it to my ham solar system

>> No.15023956

>>15022227
It seems that the more desperate you try to be a simp and make women happy, the less respect they have for you. So we should instead do the opposite - be the forbidden fruit.

>> No.15024024

>>15023228
Why would you promise me something amazing and then take it away, anonymous?

>> No.15024039

This is the equivalent to pick up artist trash for females, isn't it? No matter what gender is otherizing the other gender, they are strategizing about and in turn dehumanizing their potential _love interest_. It's absolutely strange to me. I think the core issue is that there's an imbalance in dating between men and women incentivizing behaviours detrimental to relationship fulfillment.

>> No.15024053

>>15022948
The Holy Bible (KJV)

>> No.15024058

>>15023395
literally who

>> No.15024065

>>15023495
That's because women can study whatever they want, they always have marriage as a fallback
Do you think I like STEM? No, but I'm expected to provide for a family some day

>> No.15024195
File: 184 KB, 703x960, 6c55485e36406b05a4e7f6b13584645f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15024195

>>15022246
Based Mish

>> No.15024237

>>15022246
Like >>15023800 said, homos usually get a pass. God knows why else would Wilde be so popular among art thots.

>> No.15024304

>>15022338
christ the sheer amounts of cope

>> No.15024309

>>15022338
Any women with this mindset is bound to fail to find any meaningful, fulfilling relationship. Which in turn strengthens the beliefs that fuels her mindset. Not a good way to live life.

>> No.15024328

>>15022591
most based thing I read this week

>> No.15024589

1. Interesting that she only manages to list high school authors.
2. this subreddit seems like r/redpill or r/incel but for women.

>> No.15024986

I don't think I've had a favorite anything since I was fourteen. do americans really do this?