/lit/ - Literature

Read Sartre; if a woman doesn't want to have sex with you immediately it must be Bad Faith

bataille... and not that "eye" bullshit...read "the accursed share" every volume. understand the way shit works. use that understanding to your benefit. profit.

>>1497265
This.

You don't even have to read it.
Just wikipedia existentialism, carry the book around a college campus...
win.

>philosophy
>sex

Choose one

>>1497272
>>1497267
>>1497265
Nice guys I´ll have you in mind if I get late.

>>1497294
>>1497272
Bro, I'm a chick.
I'm giving you insider trading tips here.
These are things that I know have gotten guys into my less intelligent friends' pants.
Good luck, and may the force be with you.

Philosophy = Gay Love
Not even Friends or brother love.

No pussy for you.

/thread

>>1497300
I´ll do it for sure, thanks.

I get bjs and sex for days and I'm a Philosophy major. hook up with ladies in social sciences or humanities and you will be set.

read Sartre and Russell
>U jelly?
>>1497303
>>1497271

>>1497265

This will work, as long as the woman is a pseudo-intellectual and you have at least average looks.

>>1497265
also this is the first thread I haven't wanted to fight deep&edgy

but the night is young

>>1497300
>>1497316
Tits or GTFO.

There are no girls on the internet, unless they prove it with their mammary and timestamps.

>>1497313
Any suggestion for Russell, too many choices...

>>1497313
hahahahahahahahahaha

Niggers

Pics and timestamps or it did not happen.

>>1497335
just read some of his works on disarmament to get the cool antiwar under tone mixed with some atheism and clever world view from sartre and like magic you seem cool to humanities and social sci girls.

>>1497334
like I'm stupid enough to put pics of me or my lady on 4chan. nigger you best be trollin

>>1497335

To woo the ladies? An Inquiry Into Meaning and Truth, Has Man A Future? and Power: A New Social Analysis all sound appropriately impressive. Whether or not you read them is up to you.

Those covers alone should part legs for you like Moses, though.

>>1497344
OP and his 'lady'

OP why don't you stop being a fag and start being a lover of wisdom.

>>1497350
not OP and that should be obvious since OP wants a woman and I have one.

ayn rand, if you're a pedo.

New question: what should a girl read to get some unsuspecting arts student?

tl;dr your reading fetishes

>>1497488
girls that read at all. And not just the bible :( I dated an uberchristian once and it sucked. luckily my new lady knows her way around books

the fact that even one person exists that would ever use philosophy as a tool for sex makes me rage like i've never raged before.

for one thing, you have to be disingenuous to begin with because any serious discussion of philosophy with most females would result in yawns and glazed eyeballs. second, this >>1497354
lol i've only known one female who read Sartre and even then that was his essays in existentialism. Being and Nothingness makes most people just throw their arms in the air and declare sartre as a hack. it makes me lol, but also a good standard to know who's genuinely enjoys philosophy. try heidegger too while you're at it, op, you massive faggot. i hope you slip into a coma trying to comprehend it.

>>1497488
read what you wanna read. i know one thing's for sure, if you fake reading and comprehending something just to lure in someone who actually understands the shit, eventually you're gonna look like a retard anyways. unless you're just wanting to get laid, in that case you're just a worthless human being. congrats.

>>1497861
haha I like how you think. I'm working on Kant right now and some Deleuze. I just offered advice earlier to help a brother out.

For showing, it's Sartre.

If you want to use the knowledge for pussy, it's Talleyrand, Machiavelli, Diogenes and Epicurus.

>>1497889
>to use the knowledge for pussy
our civilization is officially moving backwards

>>1497896

Err, using knowledge for power has been the main force behind the advances of civilization.

>>1497907
>implying getting some gullible slut to sleep with you just because you read a few books is 'power'

>>1497488

You don't need to read anything, just own some breasts. Men and women value different things in the opposite sex. Being (or seeming to be) impressed by whatever it is he is into is really the only advice you need.

Hey OP how about you find a woman who is attractive and who you are personally compatible with instead of going through all this trouble to appear smart.

>>>/soc/
>>>/adv/

>>1497909

Some very small measure of it, yes. We all have to start low, right ?

>>1497909
Fucking this.

So tired of kids thinking they're badass because they read the back of The Prince.

And who the hell uses philosophy to get LAID? You're clearly missing the point. Jesus.

pic is op when he tries to actually read Sartre's Being and Nothingness rather than just carry it around like a douche

>>1497927
>And who the hell uses philosophy to get LAID? You're clearly missing the point. Jesus.

Actually it is you who is missing the point. All male endeavor is motivated by the desire to get laid, philosophy is no exception.

>>1497927

Got your panties in a twist ?

How is using philosophy to get laid inherently bad, Mr. ?

>>1497907

Did you notice what went wrong in that scene? Ordinarily, Billy would work hard to make money from his paper route. Then he'd use the money to buy dinner for Mavis, thus earning the slim chance to perform the reproductive act. But in a world where we can date robots, why should he bother? Why should anyone bother? Where are all the football stars? And where are the biochemists? They're trapped! Trapped in a soft, vise-like grip of robot lips. All civilization was just an effort to impress the opposite sex... and sometimes the same sex.

>>1497925
no, you're not even anywhere on the fucking scale. you don't start reading philosophy to get laid, faggot. you read it to better undertand yourself and the world around you. you certainly don't use philosophy to manipulate others at all, so even other forms of 'power' like this don't genuinely mesh with the spirit of philosophy. you can say it's a 'tool' like any other form of knowledge, but unlike scientific forms of knowledge, you're inherently ignoring or outright betraying philosophy as a whole by using it for your own advantage.

ex: hurr durrrrr philosophy is knowledge, knowledge is power, i use my knowledge to get laid. huuuur ethics? what's that?

>>1497946

>>1497946
>betraying philosophy

Cry more, faggot. Seriously, what? Are you 15 or something?

>>1497954
Something tells me the most complicated book you've ever read involved pictures and men in tights.

I hope to God you're trolling. Otherwise, you're just a dumbass.

>>1497954
you don't belong here. go back to /b/

>>1497946

See the picture OP uploaded ?

Friedrich something ?

He was part of us hurr durr lolethics.

>>1497962
>>1497961

Asspained samefag philosophy undergrad detected. Your subject is not special, and neither are you.

>>1497954
Like I said, our civilization is going backwards. The immature now see themselves as mature, and the mature seem immature. Stupidity is exalted while knowledge is burdensome and only good if it gets you laid.

>>1497970
samefag? might wanna check the times on those posts, little boy

>>1497977

What you call immature I call mature, so in that sense the mature called immature are in fact mature, while the immature called mature remain immature.

see what I did thee ?

>>1497969
i don't understand the point you're trying to make

>>1497991

Oh right, I'm the only one who knows anything about philosophy here.

Nietzsche used philosophy to fuck bitches, among other things.

>>1497998
lol whatever. strange you say you know about philosophy and use trivia to back the claim up, all the while obviously not seeing why your "argument" doesn't prove anything at all. for one thing, nietzsche sought to, like wittgenstein, prioritize philosophy for their own ends. wittgenstein on the other hand gave up on that. nietzsche was always radical, and i love to read his work, but always seemed too preoccupied with critiquing philosophy more than adding to it. but even if you're saying "fucking bitches isn't bad because morality is relative" is still, i would say, more genuinely philosophical than simply faking being an intellectual to get laid.

btw, the picture is retarded since ubermensch is most accurately translated as OVERman, not superman (the over/under theme prevalent in his work). and to my knowledge he never claimed to be the overman, just used it as a picture of the ideal human being/philosopher.

>>1497998

>>1498019
>btw, the picture is retarded since ubermensch is most accurately translated as OVERman, not superman (the over/under theme prevalent in his work). and to my knowledge he never claimed to be the overman, just used it as a picture of the ideal human being/philosopher.
this

>>1498047
I read that in the routledge rough guide to nietzche aswell
[spolier] I also used it as chat up ammo when I was htting on some hipster fanny at a party. Didn't work [/spoiler]
*brofist*

>>1498060
>hipster fanny
Found your problem bro. Don't use words like fanny.

>>1497344
You're obviously new here. Girls should never put their figurative asses on the internet without also expecting to be spammed into showing their literal one, with Sharpie.

Also, philosophy doesn't get you laid anymore unless the woman is hideously unattractive because only hideously unattractive women study philosophy to give them a confidence boost. You're all a bunch of idealistic faggots posting your drivel on the internet in hopes of other e-penis self-strokers moving away from their own deflating cocks to give you a swift kiss on your manhood.

So guys am I like the only person here who looks at courage wolf's posts and thinks: "man, why does this guy even have a trip"

>>1498019

Fucking bitches because morality is bullshit =/= beind dishonest because morality is bullshit ?

For me, it's the same.

And it boils down to : morality is bullshit.

Cf. Protagoras, Epicurus, Machiavelli, Talleyrand, Napoléon and Nietzsche.

>>1498095
>no reason for him to tri
he's one of those "words in my trip" kind of tripfags


you know, the one's that are either too bland or too foolish to play out a real shtick