[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 20 KB, 650x400, pseud-.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14917668 No.14917668 [Reply] [Original]

>In epistemology, the Münchhausen trilemma is a thought experiment used to demonstrate the impossibility of proving any truth, even in the fields of logic and mathematics. If it is asked how any given proposition is known to be true, proof may be provided. Yet that same question can be asked of the proof, and any subsequent proof. The Münchhausen trilemma is that there are only three options when providing further proof in response to further questioning:
>The circular argument, in which the proof of some proposition is supported only by that proposition
>The regressive argument, in which each proof requires a further proof, ad infinitum
>The axiomatic argument, which rests on accepted precepts which are merely asserted rather than defended

>> No.14917818
File: 156 KB, 1242x1394, 66f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14917818

>>14917668
>Here is one hand

>> No.14919028

Bump!

>> No.14919880

Guys...

>> No.14919939

>>14917668
>>The axiomatic argument, which rests on accepted precepts which are merely asserted rather than defended
All knowledge is ultimately axiomated. And those axioms depend on biological processes in our nervous system naturally selected for helping our survival. Things are only essentialy true in proportion to how much they resonate with the spatiotemporal survival of the system claiming them.