[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 3.88 MB, 2000x3700, 1584581647790.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Mar 18 21:34:35 2020 No.14910267 [Reply] [Original]

What went so right in 2019?

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 21:35:32 2020 No.14910273 I shilled Ovid but he deserves to be way higher.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 21:38:44 2020 No.14910297 File: 1.01 MB, 1500x3242, R8lZLdW.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14910267 Frankly, the 2018 list was much better. Bonus: non-vertically-distorted covers.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 21:39:54 2020 No.14910307 >>14910267 Shit list Reddt obviously trolling

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 21:41:02 2020 No.14910310 >>14910267 >Harry Potter >Murakami >going right >>14910297 I was in charge of this one. You're welcome.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 21:42:30 2020 No.14910315 >>14910297 This is the fake list, for those of you that don't know.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 21:44:10 2020 No.14910322 >>14910315 There was no "fake list" in 2018.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 21:52:32 2020 No.14910357 >>14910322 He meant the one OP posted showing the 2019 results. Seeing how memed some books were in 2019, I wouldn't be surprised if the list was real, albeit a joke.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 23:39:40 2020 No.14910726 >>14910357 The OP is the real 2019 results. Some anon shilled a fake one for a couple weeks because he was upset Harry Potter made the list.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 18 23:59:13 2020 No.14910786 >>14910267 >top books 2019 >none of the books are published in 2019, most aren't even published in the 2000s Shitty bait OP

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 00:34:06 2020 No.14910864 File: 2.68 MB, 1820x4348, lit top 100 2017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14910267 >>14910297 Here's the 2017 list.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 00:36:31 2020 No.14910870 File: 1005 KB, 1456x3482, lit top 100 2016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14910267 >>14910864 2016 list

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 00:37:49 2020 No.14910873 File: 73 KB, 716x814, lit top 100 2015.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14910267 2015 list

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 00:39:07 2020 No.14910877 File: 1.23 MB, 1820x4348, lit top 100 2014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14910267 2014 list Also, if anyone was the 2015 list in the same format as the other ones, could you please post it?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 02:31:17 2020 No.14911167 >>14910267 Nothing went right, these are the same books listed in the prior charts just in a slightly different order Yoi guys should try different books

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 03:31:40 2020 No.14911310 >>14911167 /lit/ doesn't actually enjoy reading enough to read anything that is not socially accepted here. That's why these charts are the same 100 books just rearranged each year to fit the demographics.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 03:45:14 2020 No.14911341 >>14910297 >Great Gatsby at 58 What do you see in that boring ass required highschool reading that I don't, anon?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 04:47:40 2020 No.14911453 >>14910267 I will never understand why Stoner is so high. Top 90s maybe.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 04:59:09 2020 No.14911471 Looking at 2014 and 2019, you can see that this board has aged.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 06:10:24 2020 No.14911640 >>14911453 lurk more

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 06:11:48 2020 No.14911644 >>14911640 I do. From the lurking it's literally babby's first real novel. It's really rated that high by the fucking /lit/ board because it's so easily accessible?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 06:15:21 2020 No.14911660 >>14911471 You can see the /pol/ influences that took hold of the board's culture becoming worse and worse as the years go by

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 06:18:36 2020 No.14911668 >No Flaubert Dropped

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 07:05:36 2020 No.14911745 >Moby dick first Fucking anglos

>>	Q Thu Mar 19 07:25:49 2020 No.14911792 File: 15 KB, 251x262, 1D0BA475-6D7B-4854-88D6-116E74C5176D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14910267 >Harry Potter

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 07:50:57 2020 No.14911850 >>14910267 >Nabokov and Dostoevsky above Tolstoy when will this board grow up?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 08:00:25 2020 No.14911876 Too anglo

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 08:12:54 2020 No.14911900 >>14910310 thanks anon why was the anon in charge of 2019's version so confused that he did not exclude obvious meme suggestions like Harry Potter and Mein Kampf?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 19 08:14:58 2020 No.14911905 File: 3.38 MB, 1820x4348, lit top100 2015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14910877 here's '15 read Cannery Row because of this one for that i am grateful