[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 56 KB, 264x258, funny-fun-chad-speaking-on-4chan-looks-like-hes-talking.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14734649 No.14734649 [Reply] [Original]

"Finnegans Wake is about the cycle of life? Well yes, but to a much further extent than you probably think. You see, Joyce was smarter than you and near death he was able to see that virtually every single thing in life; is cyclical. If you can't process this then you probably haven't had sex."

>> No.14734653

>virtually every single thing in life; is cyclical.
nice grammar mr chad

>> No.14734661

>>14734649
>the Chad freeform stream of thought

>>14734653
>the virgin grammar Nazi

>> No.14734727
File: 306 KB, 1068x601, gigachad-talking.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14734727

>>14734653
You forgot your capital letter and full stop.

>> No.14734912

Theres nothing about sex in finegan.
saged

>> No.14735011

>>14734649
>joyce only figured out cycle theory on his deathbed

And you all consider him some genius...

>> No.14735090

>>14735011
That wasn't my point virgin; it's just that he understands its wordly applications to a greater extent than thou. Consider your self five years in the past; not very smart are you? Now look at yourself now, smarter (but not that smart obviously), likely fooling yourself into thinking you get cyclical theory.

Now, as a thought experiment, read (AND UNDERSTAND) Finnegans Wake, go to the /lit/ archive and reread the posts you made. You're going to realize how stupid you are and how you thought you understood th allbreaching extent of cyclical theory on earthly nature.

>> No.14735141

>>14735090
I would mop the floor with Joyce if his fart sniffing ass tried to engage in debate. The dandy would adopt a cuck pose within seconds.

>> No.14735273

>>14735141
based schizo virgin

>> No.14735289

>>14735273
>virgin

Wrong again

>> No.14735322

>>14735289
Again? I wasn't wrong the first time (unless you're referencing the book title in which case i admired the words).

>> No.14736218

We the joyce boyce

>> No.14736354

>>14736218
i honestly love joyce so much i dont get how anybody can seriously say he's not the best writer in worldy literature.