[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 56 KB, 720x445, 843984a516ba2dc70bad0559065f5c0e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14684193 No.14684193 [Reply] [Original]

Was Julius Evola a Psued?

>> No.14684198

>>14684193
Only if Nietzsche was a Pseud too, because he said the exact same thing

>> No.14684200

>>14684198

He was though

>> No.14684205
File: 65 KB, 645x729, 24345254325.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14684205

>>14684200
Keep Seething

>> No.14684217

>>14684193
Evola is Nietzsche done right. He is also Guenon done right.

That said, I do not agree with Evola.

>> No.14684219
File: 216 KB, 1024x656, julius-evola.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14684219

>>14684205

Evola wasn't even white, he was a larper

>> No.14684241

>>14684217
What dont you like about him?

I think Neech and Evola were a bit harsh on Christianity, but they have the right idea

>> No.14684284
File: 81 KB, 850x400, quote-i-owe-most-to-georges-sorel-this-master-of-syndicalism-by-his-rough-theories-of-revolutionary-benito-mussolini-69-90-68.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14684284

>>14684241
He's too anti-socialist. Non-Marxist socialisms are probably the best thing we've got at this point.

>> No.14684292
File: 262 KB, 772x462, ev.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14684292

considered an ignoramus by buddhist scholars

>> No.14684319

>>14684284
What do you mean by Non-Marxian Socialism?
Im a Strasserist myself, and I like a lot of Marx's ideas, just not his millitant Atheism and Anti-Traditionalism.

Evola opposed Socialism so much because he was looking at it through a Nietzschean lens, and Nietzsche critiqued Socialism prior to seeing the full effects of the Industrial revolution.

Modern day Capitalism (and increasingly Technocapitalism) has created a society that fosters Nietzsches "The Last Man", and if he were alive today he would be much more critical of it than he was back then, like how Heidegger was

>> No.14684377

>>14684292
Not all of them though, Evolas book received the official approbation of the Pāli Society until people started slandering him with "muh fashism" then they had to retract what they said.

What people dont realise is that everyone reads their own personal worldview into a religion, Evola did it with Fascist Buddhism, and Progressives do it with Liberal Buddhism, Atheists with Westernised Materialist Buddhism etc.

The only person who interpreted Buddhism the correct way was the Buddha himself, from there on people needed to find the best way to follow the religion themselves. Thats why religions always split into sects after the messenger dies

>> No.14684395

>>14684193
>Enemy of itself and of the world
What?