/lit/ - Literature

Love that 90% of those books are by Jews

>>14580237
Anything actually worth reading on there. The Spain one seems interesting

>>14580250
Feminism is destructive to the soul and contrary to nature.

So no

>>14580324
shut the fuck up faggot

>>14580203
>Were should I start
With the Greeks now fuck off you're not gonna read shit anyway

>>14580348
The Greeks have nothing to do with modern political systems

>>14580359
Depends. The polis obviously has no relevance but marx was influenced by aristotle who goes on about class struggle for example

>>14580359
I knew you were retarded. Kill yourself

>>14580324
How is wanting to be an independent human against nature?

>>14580481
Read a book someday

>>14580492
> can't answer the question

>>14580203
Capital

>>14580507
I don't engage in serious conservation with subhumans who haven't read any political literature prior to liberalism meme

>>14580524
> he still cant answer the question

honestly when my uni professor assigned us to read machiavelli for poli theory 101, i felt like i should throw away and forget everything i ever read from plato, locke and hobbes. the greeks belong in the trash, really

>>14580632
Keep trying retard

>>14580650
>didn't understand machiaelli, plato, locked, or hobbes
Way to waste your parents' money for your meme degree dumbfuck

>>14580660
>he didn't get a scholarship
yikes

You're better off with a decent understanding of statistics and data science. With an understanding in those disciplines, you'd be able to go straight to the source data and make a decision yourself instead of listening to subjective Jewish writers.

>>14580652
> still has yet to use his supposed vast intelligence to answer a simple question yet will continue to engage in responding

>>14580672
What would you recomend? I won't lie the only thing I've read recently is a ton of cybernetic stuff so I haven't really been reading anything useful to understand the basic stuff

>>14580359
Most retarded thing I've read all day

>>14580672
>implying that following the citations in feminist works will lead back to anything resembling stats or data

>>14580712
I guess I should have said pic unrelated. Just used it as an OP image. Also still haven't answered the question

>>14580712
Obviously not, but having a clear understanding of Economics and Statistics could clear up major feminist talking points. For example, the wage gap theory is laughed at for anyone with even a slight understanding of those disciplines. That could be discovered without reading any female Jewish literature and by just looking at applicable government data. Pic related is how governments lie about gun crime and won't point out the obvious.

>>14580680
It's more of a mindset then something you "learn". Don't forget, Econ, Stats, Data Science, etc is a SOFT science with loads of subjectivity so common sense is still needed.

"Wealth of Nations" and "How to Lie with Statistics" are two easy beginners reads I'd highly recommend.

>>14580660
plato, locke and hobbes belong in the trash

machiavelli is all you need to understand politics, OP. you can move on to marx after that

>>14580885
>machiavelli is all you need to understand politics
>I barely read anything but The Prince and believe it is the end all be all of politics

You must be 18 years old to post here.

>>14580203
each of those topics has a detailed intellectual history that goes through the western world,so i think a better strategy would be to refine what you're interested in discovering first. keep in mind that starting points, in retrospect, are almost always arbitrary and trivial, so just dive into something interesting and keep pulling on the thread of your interest until you discover something else that carries your interest in another direction.

>>14580672
I get what you're saying, but would counter that you can't leapfrog the thousands of years of intellectual treatment and evolution of complex ideas like capitallism, economy, political order, etc..by statistics and quantitative analysis (which were born over time from scholars and amateurs thinking about practical solutions-for instance, a lot of basic stats came from businesspeople trying to improve brewing and commercial transactions).

Wealth of Nations may come off as archaic if you haven't read much, but would second that if you're determined to read your way through the ideas. You should also check out youtube videos for a survey of political history to hunt your next fascination

>>14580842
>>14581314
Genuine thanks anons