[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 30 KB, 333x500, Being and Time.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14475107 No.14475107 [Reply] [Original]

I've found the ultimate truth, I have found essence.

I've managed to unify both Hegel, Jung and Heidegger into a completely unique phili-psycho system. Drawing the most from Heidegger, and built around Plato's basic propositions.

Seems /lit/ really did produce a philosophical genius, but now the coffee's cold.

>> No.14475118

>>14475107
>jung
cringe

>> No.14475120

>>14475107
I'll just learn German and ancient Greek yet.

>> No.14475134

>>14475107
ok tell us more you fucking sperg

>> No.14475140

>>14475118
YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE NECESSARY UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS WITH AN UNCONSCIOUS.

I could always add Schelling for this but I haven't read him yet.

>> No.14475155

>>14475134
What do you want to know?

>> No.14475165

>>14475107
You’re still circling around the egoism of Being. You have yet to confront the Other without conflict, with love, my dear friend

>> No.14475177

>>14475165
I've transcended beyond the self/other conflict.

>> No.14475198

>>14475165
Don't you see that the Geschick of a Volk does this?

But essence is so much more than that.

>> No.14475227

>>14475177
>Geschick
>>14475198
Your very language is riddled in the offensive, with the vocabulary of war. Not even your questions leave you in peace. If only we could find our way, and together my friends

>> No.14475285

>>14475227
Forgive me, this is an exciting time.

Remember "National consciousness provides, therefore, of the strongest experiences of the immanence of God."

>> No.14475327

>>14475285
*one of*

>> No.14475789

>>14475107
cringe

>> No.14475805

>>14475165
You other is also you
There is no not you

>> No.14475840

>>14475107
>he read heidegger instead of Based Husserl
OH NONONO

>> No.14475946

>>14475107
expound or gtfo

>> No.14476031

>>14475840
>Husserl
Btfo by Derrida

>> No.14476044

>>14476031
>Derrida
BTFO by Searle

>> No.14476080

>>14475805
Then who are you responding to

>> No.14476263

>>14475107
>I am a genius
>both Hegel, Jung and Heidegger

>> No.14476300

Pro tip: If you have to say you're a genius you're likely not
Post your ideas and let them speak for themselves.

>> No.14476409

>>14475107
Elaborate pls

>> No.14476441

>>14476044
Lmao read Limited Inc bro. Derrida fucking ragdolls him.

>> No.14476445

>>14475198
>>14475285
So, OP is a nationalist? You read Heidegger to literally my guy.

>> No.14476733

>>14475155
what's your best criticism of Heidegger?

>> No.14476751

>>14475140
>He’s thinks humans possess an unconscious
Oh no, it’s retarded :(

>> No.14477184

>>14476445
>So, OP is a nationalist?
Yes, though I prefer transcendental centrist.

>>14476733
Hmmm, I'd say Heidegger has a few basic points which are all equally as important and equally as wrong, however for this I would say the famous Sheckstultz mistake.

>>14476751
>Oh no, it’s retarded :(
How do you have a memory? How do you have intuition? How is it that we find many a' drives activating away from the light of the ego?

>> No.14477207

>>14475946
>and this was the year an anon gave up all fame and identifiable influence to an anonymous paper sniffing forum which would lead to the greatest intellectual revolution in not only philosophy, but the entirety of modern mans zeitgeist, since Kant.

>> No.14477215

>>14475840
What makes the mathematical jew better?

>> No.14477225

>>14477184
>How do you have a memory? How do you have intuition? How is it that we find many a' drives activating away from the light of the ego?
...this is your argument for an “unconscious”? So surface level and lacking anything but metaphysical properties. Good hearted, but ill informed.

>> No.14477452

>>14477215
because it's better than poetic nazi

>> No.14477463

>>14475107
Now read Derrida and realise somewhere along the way you have fucked up.

>> No.14477477
File: 193 KB, 450x418, Cancerous Pepe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14477477

>>14477225
>does consciousness exist?
>yes
>and not all psychic events and functions are simultaneously conscious?
>sounds bout right
>so there is an unconscious?
>...this is your argument for an “unconscious”? So surface level and lacking anything but metaphysical properties. Good hearted, but ill informed.

>> No.14477492

>>14477225
Psychology should be understood as what it always was, a framing point for understanding and not an end itself. This is what Jung says. Whether it is intentionality or not doesn't matter as we know the psyche functions a certain way. Just as the idea of intentionality has its value whether literal or not.

>> No.14477493

>>14477452
But that's literally my philosophical ideal.

>> No.14477509

>>14477477
Semantics. What is consciousness? Where does the concious exist? Where does the unconscious exist? What do the brain images we have say about all of this?
>>14477492
It’s too bad modern medicine has proven that there is no multi-layered brain on which these freudian concepts exist in any meaningful way other than just as concepts to placehold behavior.

>> No.14477517
File: 765 KB, 1920x1278, 1578211475687.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14477517

>this entire thread
Retroactively BTFO by Shaykh Guénon (pbuh).

>> No.14477591

>>14477509
>says Semantics
>begins to start an argument about the definition of consciousness not from a meta
Now you've done it, might as well be arguing a math sum, only an is without ought if there's no meta.

>It’s too bad modern medicine has proven that there is no multi-layered brain on which these freudian concepts exist in any meaningful way other than just as concepts to placehold behavior.
Not an a