/lit/ - Literature

Do I have to be pretty to get all the women?

Do you have to be autist to make a post like this?

I'll answer that. Yes!

roons is cute!

>>14367969
Is she, though? She's not even thirty and always looks like a textbook fairytale witch.

Anyone here dated a famous writer? In 2004 I had a drink with and ended up snogging Polly Stenham. She did not agree to see me again

>>14368143
And you're a neet now, anon?

>>14367838
"No"

No. Good, empathic writing usually requires life experience, and ugly people have their life experience hampered by lookism. Occasionally you get cool weird shit from lookism-made autists but it's not something to count on. My chips are on people who aren't hampered by the mental distractions and illnesses that come with being disenfranchised due to your genetics or at least physical body.

>>14368175
Well, I'd hardly say that. It's true, I crept the boards in my youth. But I never really had it in my blood, and that's what's so essential, isn't it, theatrical zeal in the veins. Alas I have little more than vintage wine and memories. It is the most shattering experience of a young man's life when one morning he awakes and quite reasonably says to himself "I will never play the Dane." When that moment comes, one's ambition ceases. Don't you agree?

>>14368201
camus was ugly. one of his girlfriends even called him "my monkey"

>>14368201
Was my first pick, too. But I decided for Sartre, just because he was the ugliest badass out there.

>>14368221
>this man is notably ugly

21st century pornsick hellworld

>>14368212
Ofcourse I do, Sir!

>>14368221
>camus was ugly
What happens to your perception of beauty when it's completely distorted by pseudo perfect representations on TV and film

Paul Scarron might literally be the ugliest.

>>14367838
No, I've written some good stuff.

>>14368221
cute!

>>14368419
Looks like hollaback

>>14367838
Not really, but to make the Alexander Popes of the world feel better we all lie and say yes.

>>14367969
she's fucking not, she looks like a fucking goblin which is fine because just cause she has a pussy doesn't mean she needs to be sexually appealing to men- why do you immediately reduce her to that?

>>14369219
Why do you immediately reduce womanhood to "having a pussy"? Disgusting vulgar idiot. I'm honestly repulsed and dejected reading that.

>>14368221
Do you Know how much pussy he slayed?

>>14367838
You can be ugly and write poorly, but still become a billionaire.

>>14369403
>implying you wouldn't suckle her tiddies

>>14368212
>this is how /lit/ types

>>14369436
>this is how /tv/ replies

No but you have to have male genitals :^)

>>14368212

>>14367838
No

>>14369503
sage

>>14368143
who?

>>14367838
For women ,YES