[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 23 KB, 300x456, 43253453425.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14313322 No.14313322 [Reply] [Original]

I was thinking about this book and if there were a modern day take on it.

Instead of a retard being given intelligence, an incel would be given a Chad body and mind that would wear off after a year or something.

Would you read it?

>> No.14313589

>>14313322
No.

>> No.14313612

>>14313322
No.

>> No.14313634

>>14313322
No

>> No.14313647
File: 512 KB, 713x662, 1561722636970.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14313647

>>14313322
Nein.

>> No.14313651

>>14313322
不用了,謝謝

>> No.14313913

>>14313322
No.

>> No.14314939

No.

>> No.14314951
File: 215 KB, 1000x1478, 2278D5B2-FEAB-4F47-A7D1-47DCED078FE8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14314951

>>14313322
Yes.

>> No.14314983

>>14313322
Despite the naysayers, I guarantee you that if you wrote it competently (or even semi-competently) it'd be discussed here non-stop. One need only bring to mind that cat person story some time ago.

>> No.14315268

>>14313651
The 了 here is superfluous. In other words, 不用“了”。

>> No.14315297

>>14315268
no. youre wrong desoo. its perfectly acceptable to use the 了
more conversational and casual? sure. superfluous? hardly.