[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 39 KB, 624x624, alfred-north-whitehead-2yufds5midvbavdcl8o2rk-624x624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14312289 No.14312289 [Reply] [Original]

https://streamable.com/75jbt
How will guenonfag recover?

>> No.14312456

I enjoy reading both Whitehead and Guenon

>> No.14312558 [DELETED] 

Wtf Sadler

>> No.14312581

>>14312289
>w-well ... I d-don't agree with that but I'll avoid attempting to explain why it's wrong

What's there to recover from, Sadler is simply coping because he has no real answers

>> No.14312610

>>14312456
haven't read either of them, but do they even contradict themselves?

>> No.14312612 [DELETED] 

>>14312610
Yes Guénon and Parmenides retroactively refuted Whitehead and the process philosophical tradition.

>> No.14312910
File: 79 KB, 852x762, 1555339099596.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14312910

>That is how most people on this board actually say Guenon and Parmenides

>> No.14313977

>>14312610
They're talking about different things mostly

>> No.14314004

>cutting out the best part where he explains how he wasn't refuted

>> No.14314017

>>14312456
I do too.

>> No.14314019

>>14314004
He never did my dude. I watched him say it live.

>> No.14314027

>>14312289
I need the full source.

>> No.14314029

>>14312581
Because it is a retarded statement to say in the first place.

>> No.14314049

>>14314027
For full context start at 4:50
https://youtu.be/6Wmh_rDErQA

>> No.14314059

>>14312581
He tries to answer as many questions as he can so he rushes through some but it would have been cool to hear more