/lit/ - Literature

Nah

Yes
>>14195902
nice meme you got there.

>>14195898
why was russel such a cuck?

>>14195906
>nice meme you got there.
He doesn´t know

>>14195898
Even /sci/ believes in God while /lit/ doesn't

Neither are particularly intelligent. 80% of the threads on either will usually be nazi stuff and woman hating. /sp/ usually has a more intelligent and self aware user base than /lit/, which is largely a haven for self-deluding idiots who think reading a book means they are smart

>>14195898
Wdym Mathematics isn't human when it's literally a human construction

>>14195898
pic related
>>14195921
pretty accurate

>>14195924
Is there an edit of that twilight zone pic with Kant?

>>14195902
>tfw I am an entire standard deviation above the simps on this board
Feels good guys.
God is real

>>14195898
Probably. I say this as a /lit/ native.
>>14195902
The fact that this anon actually thinks the average IQ of /lit/ users is 147 proves that this board is filled with retards.
>>14195921
This guy's first two sentences are accurate. /lit/ and /sci/ are just places where pseudointellectuals blogpost their lives, discuss politics and their inability to have sex. /sci/ seems to be more consistent though.

>>14195898
>Admits his whole materialistic worldview is false
Russell was such a bitch.

there is no true /sci/ without /lit/, and there is no true /lit/ without /sci/

>>14196092
/hc/ is where the real intellectuals hang out.

>mathematics is not humans
>it has nothing to do with this planet

What a bitch.

>>14196092
>The fact that this anon actually thinks the average IQ of /lit/ users is 147 proves that this board is filled with retards.
He doesn't, it's just a shitposting image autist.

>>14195924
if thats the case then so is everything within our percieved reality.

Maths is actually intepretation of properties within the universe. There is a good chance when people stop exsisting, the properties still do. (based on countless of deaths where life continues)

There is literally thousands of proofs for this reason. It's a basic blueprint no different to the measurements of height describing any property.

>>14196723
>if thats the case then so is everything within our percieved reality.

Yes, and?

>>14196723
"Property" is a naïve metaphysical position, though it's one that most people believe in. Weirdly, the best refutation of the whole object/property/event worldview is computer science: they're engaged in a long-term effort to reconstruct the world as a collection of objects and their properties, and it never works. And, bless their hearts, they always blame it on a particular model of objects (i.e., "object-oriented programming is dead; long live object-oriented programming"), rather than understanding that objects and properties is how we interpret a world that has nothing to do with objects and properties.

>>14195898
>Is /sci/ unironically smarter than /lit/?
/lit/ makes your retard stoner friend who just discovered his pet religion/ideology/self-help book/entry level novelist and will not shut the fuck up about it look like a genius

/sci/ is shit /lit/ is ludicrous

>>14195898
I think they do a better job at staying on-topic in their threads, but they also have no tolerance for any kind of metaphysical questions because science itself can't provide anything close to an answer that isn't extremely, empirically autistic.

>>14195902
Where is /asp/?