/lit/ - Literature

You're a misogynist that's why

you have no female friends

if you want to have sex talk about books, video games, science fiction tv shows and movies, this is the most trusted method to getting labes up to your eyebrows

>>1417077
I'm a mysogine and talk to women about books all the time at college.

women love to talk about your opinions on mazalan and a song of fire and ice and warhammer 40k it makes them so god damn wet

Probably because you don't talk to girls. I get to talk about books more than girls than with male friends. I find that girls are generally more into books, but maybe I need new male friends.

you never brought it up and expect them to do the leg work because you're uninteresting

>>1417128
This could be true. But from my experience girls treat books as another indie fashion accessory.

You haven't read twilight or the time travellers wife. Read those two, instant sex.

>>1417234
>You haven't read twilight or the time travelers wife. Read those two, instant sex with 15 year olds.

>>1417244
"Sex with 15 year olds"

Awkward, didactic sex just for a tighter hole that won't stop bleeding once you're done with it. Cool.

>>1417249
Has never had a 15yo

>>1417249
>implying you have to hang around for the bleeding part instead of just cheesing it out the door before the cops come

>>1417143
stop associating yourself with retards.

>>1417143
i guess you need more experience

Because you can't make a connection with intelligent humans?
I don't know OP, I'm not your therapist.

>>1417263
>>1417258
Well, hipster bitches at my college are like that.

>>1417258
>>1417263
can you guys fill out an age/gender/degree thing so i can see who to trust?

Misogynist topic goes off-course into discussion on how to commit statutory rape and get away with it.

Stay classy, 4chan.

>>1417143
>from my experience
watching from the bushes is poor experience

>>1417275
>implying someone who wouldn't statutorily rape if they could get away belongs on 4chan

it is because, as democritus and his relative contemporaries have said, women are vain, shallow, and superstitious.

>>1417267
stop hanging out with hipster bitches. find women who are better than that. one of my best friends is a woman who turned me on to some of my favorite books

>>1417285
Hardly their fault, poor things.
It's their tiny brain, it overheats.

>>1417275
>Stay classy, 4chan.
>classy, 4chan.
isn't this an oxymoron..

>>1417294
I know valuable, not shallow women do exist, they're just a minority.

>>1417304
4chan can be classy as fuck.

>>1417300
fucking lolled

>>1417309
>I know valuable, not shallow people do exist, they're just a minority.
fix'd
If you adjusted your thinking a little, you might actually meet some of them.

>>1417309
>a tripfag
>socially inept HURR GENDURR comments

Are you sure you are one of the glorious people you speak of?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w

ITT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w&feature=related

>>1417330
i fucking lol'd

>>1417336
>>1417330

Enfieldmind

>mfw

>>1417347
>4 minutes apart
more like
>oshitiwantedtopostthatwellanywayiwillpostitregardlessmind

>Thread on intelligence of females
>Takes an hour for someone to post video in >>1417330

Oh /lit/ ...

This thread is full of morons. I wouldn't associate with any of you gentlemen in real life. The reasons why you never converse with women about books are quite apparent. If you can't see them, then you don't deserve to converse with women.

Also
>>1417124
Please don't talk to your women about Warhammer 40k books, unless they happen to be the one female in the entire world that actually plays. For the last time, I don't fucking care. My boyfriend will not shut up about this series -.-

I have, but I wish I hadn't. It involved vampires.

/lit/ confirmed for /r9k/ 2 - Academic Boogaloo

I've yet to meet a woman who has read the count of monte cristo. Fucking whores.

>>1417372
>wouldn't associate with any of you gentlemen in real life
>is dating a man who reads warhammer books
Herp derp

>>1417372
>wouldn't associate with any of you gentlemen in real life
>is dating a man who reads warhammer books
Thank god woman, stay away from me.

I never met a woman who has read Tolstoy.
Mother only does crosswords.

>>1417372
hope for you that you aren't really girl. :/

>I've never had a conversation with a woman regarding books. Why?
>I've never had a conversation with a woman

SO MANY MYSTERIES WERE REVEALED THAT DAY

>>1417372
Handy hints for you
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLgzxk7Rd-Q&NR=1

>>1417409
wax dem eyebrows man.

ok so i am attracted to this woman and she is totally hot, but then she starts to talk, and i think wow, she's really stupid. then the bitch has the nerve to reject me because she doesn't find me attractive!? now all women are stupid bitches that should just shut the fuck up.

>>1417439
your butt must hurt a lot.

>>1417449
your inane attempt at humor is unnecessary.

tl:dr
because you didn't START ONE

>>1417409
My mom has read Tolstoy. I was just talking to her about Anna Karenina the other day.

I'm a femanon. I read books. Oh, but I'm a lesbian. umad?

>>1417840
I'm a femanon. I wish I could meet lesbians that read books.

>>1417407
>>1417401
Men that read something other than Drizzt and Warhammer 40k are hard to find.

>>1417372


>If you don't know, I won't tell you

Fuck off woman.

>>1417853
wait, what? are you serious?

>>1417409
I find it hard to believe Anna Karenina is a big testostertale, it was a bit too soap opera-ish for me, but plan on reading War & Peace someday. And Count of Monte Cristo is one of my next reads >>1417393

But, I mean, if you seek out the dumb-attention-whore bitches, would you really expect them to surprise you?

>>1417840
>>1417848
>shit-tier sexuality & proud of it

>>1417439
yeah cos like, all guys are like this, you know, like, not just the ones on /lit/, or anything

>>1417871
My ex only read Drizzt novels and comics.

My current bf reads more than Warhammer 40k but talks about it frequently.

Most other men I know are the faggoty "I hate books" type or just never read.

>>1417893

hahaha you are fat, ugly and probably play World of Warcraft and the only people you know are fat, ugly neckbeard types.

Haha. Nice choices, bitch.

>>1417908
pfft harsh.

I really didn't know how to reply myself.....

>>1417908
lol because keeping nerd company automatically makes me fat.

u mad bc no girls talk to you about books.

I've never talked to anyone about books

:/

>>1417927

You mad because you are fat and pockmarked in the small patches of skin not red and scabby with crusty white pustules of acne and you have no idea how to interact with normal people and so surround yourself with gross fucktards that other women have too much dignity to be in the vicinity of so that you may satisfy your lust for attention.

>>1417945
Yep, u mad.

>>1417958

Have fun with your sweaty, obese, greasy, pimple popping "sex"

>>1417945

The madness...it's...it's over 9000!

>>1417979
mad anon is mad.

>>1417982

Been here all month, huh?

Well, welcome to the club. Please be sure not to tell anyone, or we won't have our super secret clubhouse full of neat stuff normal people won't understand anymore.

I'm an engineer, most of them tend not to read. Sadly the sort of people that do read rarely hang around in my circles. Plus most liberal arty type chicks don't go near engineers. Sigh...

You know, I rarely have conversations with men about books either. To be honest the majority of my friends don't read unless its for school.

I once went through my facebook friends (200 friends) and looked at everything they had under "Books" and honestly less than 30 of them had anything, not counting those who only had 'The Bible' and 'Twilight'.

I only counted them if they had more than those two and Harry Potter. Most of those who did have something that weren't those three had less than four or five books listed. Only two or three friends had a good selection by /lit/'s standards and only one of them was male.

And I'd say 10+ people had something along the lines of "FUCK BOOKS" listed.

>>1418020
200 "friends"

Idiot.

>>1418025
What's the problem? Some people use facebook to add acquaintances.

>>1418020
First example I could find.

I've considered deleting anyone like this.

I've discussed literature with a female coworker of mine who attended Sarah Lawrence. She knew a lot more about literature than I and was better read. But, on the other hand, she called Life and Fate a shitty book which made me upset and I had to do my best not to hit her.

>>1418020
And of course, among those 20, there are the ones who only read for school, or have only read a couple of books outside school so that they can say they read but don't really and therefore only talk about those one or two books when they're backed up into a corner because someone else mentioned books.

Of course, only associating with these types of people says really a lot about you
Even if you aren't one, you may be coming off as the type of woman that is being complained about, how do you demonstrate that you have a brain? Or do you?

You probably have if you've discussed books on /lit/ a few times, OP. A significant amount of the users here are female.

>>1418005
>is an engineer outside of work
cut that shit out.

>>1418033
>200 friends
>add acquaintances

>>1418049
*wasn't intending that to sound like you don't actually have a brain, just maybe don't demonstrate

>>1418049
>Even if you aren't one, you may be coming off as the type of woman that is being complained about, how do you demonstrate that you have a brain? Or do you?
this. 200 FB friends makes me h8 u.

>>1418049
Well if you don't have to prove yourself neither do I.

To reiterate, most of these people are just acquaintances. I probably only talk to about 10 of them on a regular basis.

>>1418065
200 and you talk to 10? Sounds like a lengthy fraud.

>>1418061
Okay, I see. Well there really isn't many to demonstrate I have a brain to when less than five of my facebook friends probably read on a regular basis. Fewer of my friends in real life.

This isn't really a small number comparatively. Most people in my age group rarely read these days. If they do, they're probably attending big shot universities and there are none around my community. I attend a community college and live in hickville. Are you really surprised at the statistics?

I don't really have many friends, but of the ones I do have, only the girls read (and no, not Twilight). My boyfriend used to read, though it was mainly Star Wars and Star Trek books.

But really, I can't find many people around here with great taste. In my literature class, everyone was asked to say some of their favorite books/authors when introducing themselves, and you wouldn't believe the Dan Brown and Meyer's.

>>1418065
he's not saying you have to prove yourself, instead that you're doing the opposite in coming across as the type of person misogynists complain about on here.

>>1418065
Que? When did this turn into a pissing contest? I don't know you, nor would I probably care to, I just think that it says more about you than the other people that you collect as friends, although apparently don't care for that you don't associate with people you find intellectually stimulating. I'd like to think I do represent myself as someone with a brain, and find that I get along well with other people who are well read, or intellectual in other demonstrable ways

>>1418071
My social network is big, but my group of friends is small. Most of the "friends" I have on facebook I've met through jobs which have had a huge number of people in my age group working at one place in one time (Last job literally gained me 60 friends over the span of like two months). My social network is literally the kind that you add everyone you know. I rarely see these people anymore now that I don't have that job.

I'm just not a social butterfly, I guess.

I have yet to find a guy (in real life) who reads anything other than Crichton, Palahnuik, or the Wheel of Time series. I apparently live in a really shitty area, but I have asked pretty much everyone in my classes.

>>1417071
You probably had never talked with a male who reads books either. Fix you world view and you will see that 90% of BOTH men and women won't talk to people like us.

>>1418084
You seem mad.

There are very few intelligent people to associate with in these parts. I still don't get why adding acquaintances on facebook is a bad thing? I just add people I know. It's not like I plan on associate with them or have any high standards about them. I just know them. If they seem like a cool person I might try to get to know them and be friends with them. The number of facebook friends doesn't have anything to do with the quality of friends. Most people just add acquaintances. I rarely use my facebook anyways and most people I don't care about are hidden.

My college has a Facebook group, and I tried to get some discussion going for reading. I asked what everyone was reading at the moment, and these are the only responses I got, out of the 300 people in the group who liked reading. (genders are female, male, male, female, female, male, if you can't tell)

>>1418106
Not mad, just depressed that yet another fellow chick is using circumstances as an excuse to come off as a ditz

christ you guys

i'm streets ahead of this thread and i'm completely terrible at life

>>1418124
And here's the only responses I got when I asked favorite book. Again, out of ~300 in the group who were interested in reading. I sad.

>>1418135
How am I coming off as a ditz to anyone?

If there's no one to talk to about books, there's no one to talk to about books.

Like I said, maybe three of my friends actually had more than 5 books listed on FB. The friends I talk to regularly in real life either already know I read and what I'm reading or don't read and don't care what I'm reading. Anyone else I meet if they read, we'll talk about books. I haven't met anyone else who reads in months. :(

OP you either

- Do not hang out with hipsters
- Are not majoring in english

otherwise you would know... women and books. women and books everywhere.

>>1418135
As another "fellow chick" I would say that fretting over whether 18-year-old hikkikomori on 4chan might judge you to be vapid is a lot more embarrassing than being facebook friends with people who don't read

Okay OP, let's go. What are you reading?

>>1418145
Nobody cares about your fucking Facebook friends. Nobody gives a fucking shit.

>>1418146
yeah, women buy 80% of fiction and it's not like that's all twilight. this is like one of those /r9k/ threads that take place in an alternate universe where women are pickier about looks in a long-term partner than men are

>>1418148
k

>>1418158
>an alternate universe where women are pickier about looks in a long-term partner than men are
what? chicks almost universally want muscle/tone on a guy or atleast the replacement of it in 'built-fat'. whereas gay guys seem to have more varied tastes in men. thats just what i got from researching online.

>>1418191
gay guys are much more shallow than women.

>internet research
What gay forums have you been browsing?

>>1418195
>What gay forums have you been browsing?
(o_0)
>gay guys are much more shallow than women.
how? thats even less than i said. at least i mentioned the muscle thing which if you ask any girl about they'd say its a perfect thing.

good game anyhow.

>>1418222
tybrax, you know nothing about women. seriously. stop trying. not every woman wants the same thing.

ok :/