[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 28 KB, 620x330, 52345342534534.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14112943 No.14112943 [Reply] [Original]

Name three (3) philosophers who are above all others: those who refute/retroactively refute all the rest and have thrones in dimensions far beyond our comprehension.

No order:
>Kierkegaard
>Thales
>Wittgenstein

>> No.14112948

>>14112943
hegel
derrida
wittgenstein

>> No.14112951

>>14112943
Get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich. No more internet for today

>> No.14112956

sorry to ruin thread, i havent read a fuckton of philosophy yet, but ill add one
>Nietzsche

>> No.14112957

>>14112948
>derrida

(you)

>> No.14112963

>>14112948
>derrida
He refuted himself LOL

>> No.14112975

>>14112943
>Kierkegaard
>Wittgenstein
>Thales
Fully patrician take,
OP. I'd replace Kierkegaard with Guénon, unironically. Kierkegaard's best work was his novel, for me.

>> No.14112985

>>14112943
>retroactive refutation
how is this possible in practice? if a logical refutation of an argument has been published, one would presume philosophers would be aware of it and thus not make the mistake of making the very argument that had already been refuted

>> No.14112988

Plato
Descartes
Immanuel Kant

>> No.14112997

Sam harris
Joe rogan
Black science man

>> No.14113017

Thales? Why?

>> No.14113024

>>14112943
>>Kierkegaard
Dislike him.

>> No.14113115

>>14113024
i know this is /lit/ but why
>>14113017
knew more about hydrogen than centuries' worth of scientists/philosophers after him

>> No.14113136

>>14112997
Lmao

>> No.14113309

>>14112943
Stirner
Skinner
McLuhan

>> No.14113369
File: 689 KB, 693x552, 1570992710539.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14113369

>> No.14113385

Muhammad
Al Ghazali
Sayyid Qutb

>> No.14113391

>>14112943
>Nietzsche
>Skinner
You only need two

>> No.14113419

>>14112975
>Kierkegaard's best work was his novel, for me.
What the fuck? He had many pseudonyms, which work are you even referring to?

>> No.14113475

>>14113385
calling Muhammad (pbuh) a philosopher implies that he came up with the holy Qu'ran himself instead of having it dictated to him by the angel Gabriel, nice try infidel

>> No.14113552
File: 304 KB, 500x332, buddha3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14113552

>>14113369

Daily reminder that Dharmakirti completely BTFOs Shankaracharya

>> No.14113556

>>14113552

List:

Nagarjuna
Dharmakirti
Karmapa III

>> No.14113557

Kant, Hegel

>> No.14113598
File: 555 KB, 1260x2948, 1358010813.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14113598

>>14113552
I can't even imagine the levels of cope needed to believe this. Dharmakirti lived in the 6th or 7th century. Shankara was 8th century. Dharmakirti had no idea what Vedanta was, Shankara was the one who came several hundred years after Dharmakirti and completely destroyed his garbage philosophy. Pic related is a summary of Shankara's criticisms of Buddhism. The section about Yogachara/Vijnanavada in the picture completely BTFOs the ideas of Dharmakirti and exposes them as incoherent and illogical. I don't understand how someone could still take Dharmakirti seriously when he was destroyed by Shankara that bad.

>> No.14113626
File: 106 KB, 539x259, dharmakirtivsshankhara-scharfstein.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14113626

>>14113598

Well https://books.google.com/books/about/Comparative_History_of_World_Philosophy.html?id=1xXJBZLn04IC has a legend that says otherwise

>> No.14113727
File: 65 KB, 266x273, tfw_you_see_a_buddhist.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14113727

>>14113626
Buddhists wrote a myth in an attempt to soothe their asspain and preserve their dignity after Shankara completely destroyed one of their more influential thinkers, not a single Buddhist thinker ever being unable to provide any response to Shankara's critiques or a defense of Dharmakirti's ideas in light of Shankara's eviscerating of them, they had to recourse to made-up "we wuz debaters n sheeit" narratives.

>> No.14113935

>>14112988
>grouping Plato with brainlets Decartes and Kant

>> No.14113944
File: 699 KB, 770x766, 1572850790128.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14113944

>>14113935
How are either of them brainlets? They seem perfectly brilliant to me.

>> No.14113951

>>14113556
Based and tibetpilled

>longchenpa
>jamgon knogtrul
>mipham

>> No.14113963

>Hermes
>Kierkegaard
>Nietsche

>> No.14113966

Plato
Kant
Schopenhauer

>> No.14113973

>Plato
>Aristotle
>Kant
if you removed these three figures there would be literally no philosophy

>> No.14113974

>>14113966
Alright I just named my three favorites, but everyone else is doing that too.

>> No.14113979

Plato
Kant
Frege

>> No.14115057

>>14112943
bump

>> No.14115176

>>14113552
Name of that anime book girl meme?

>> No.14115312

>>14112957
>>14112963
Too dumb for Derrida

>> No.14116452

>>14113115
>knew more about hydrogen than centuries' worth of scientists/philosophers after him
source

>> No.14116457
File: 26 KB, 257x400, tao.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14116457

>>14112943
Zhuangzi

>> No.14116466

Nick Land

>> No.14116477
File: 387 KB, 1028x1600, Plato.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14116477

>>14112943
>Plato
>Kant(/Hegel)
>Kierkegaard
>Side mention: Heidegger..

>> No.14116483

>>14116457
this and marx

>> No.14116484

>>14113309
>Stirner
>Skinner
>McLuhan
You should be gassed.

>> No.14116488

Plato
Plotinus
Plato

>> No.14116491

>>14112943
Isn't that the Irish Times beauty columnist?

>> No.14116513

>>14115312
You got tricked into believing that Derrida isn't self-contradictory. We can only feel sorry for you.

>> No.14116753

>>14116452
>everything is made of water

>> No.14117001

>>14112943
Hitler
Nietzsche
Evola

>> No.14117013

>>14112943
Parmenides
Shankara
Hegel

>> No.14117091

>>14116513
there is no self

>> No.14117113

>>14113973
based.

>> No.14117134

>>14113419
I think he means his book

>> No.14117391

>>14116753
Hydrogen isn't water you retard.
That's like saying water is bread because you use it to make bread, and then saying that we drink bread from a glass.

>> No.14117549

aside from d&g and the meme trilogy (kant / hegel / heidegger):

>nick land
>reza negarestani
>wittgenstein

>>14112943
love thales and especially kierkegaard, but they're not exactly a trascendent god of philosophy
wittgenstein is obviously a correct choice though

>>14112948
>derrida
lol
>hegel
sure

>>14113309
lol no - love mcluhan though

>>14113935
hot take: kant is more of a transcendent philosophy god than plato/decartes, by far

>> No.14117569

Husserl
Heidegger
Nietzsche

>> No.14117577

>>14113944
you just hadn't read enough phenomenologists

>> No.14117634

>>14117549
Only a hot take because this board has celsius room temperature iq.

>> No.14117796

>>14113419
Pretty sure he means Diary of a Seducer, which is neither a novel nor a book but whatever

>> No.14117868

>Plato
>Nietzsche
>Wittgenstein
And maybe >Kant

>> No.14118023

>>14112943
>Hume
>Kant
>Me

>> No.14118081

>>14117868
>Nietzsche
>maybe Kant
>maybe

Kys poser

>> No.14118159

>>14113385
Qutb is drivel

>> No.14118184

Wittgenstein's my guy, the later stuff not the Tractatus. He turned me into an artist.

>> No.14118200

>>14113419
>>14117796
That's precisely what I mean and if you don't understand that it's a novelization of his relationship with the woman he couldn't bring himself to marry, because you're too busy reading it like a literal diary written under a pseudonym instead, I don't know what to tell you. Kierkegaard embellished aspects of his experiences with her in order to make sense of it himself, and the myth he created could only be published as it was for shame

>> No.14118236

>>14118200
We get that it’s a fictionalized account of an esthete doing much what Kierkegaard did to Regine. My point is it’s neither a book nor a novel—it’s just a part of a book, part of Either/Or.

>> No.14118252

>>14112943
Hume
Jung
Bolzano

>> No.14118259

>>14113973
that was not the question but ok, fag

>> No.14118265

why does this board have so much philosophy discussion? are the same people arguing about prose and fiction also reading philosophy and really dry marxist theory? i don't get it

>> No.14118280

Aristotle
Hegel
Marx

>> No.14118301

>>14115176
It looks like the protagonist from Little Witch Academia.

>> No.14119778
File: 278 KB, 800x929, A2AULhz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14119778

>>14112943
Neitszche -> Heidegger -> Sloterdijk
This progression sets up and then solves the human problem.

>> No.14119789

>>14118265

mostly no, but everybody that actually browses this board posts. nobody lurks

>> No.14119808

>>14117091
right so if you kill your(self) no harm done yeah?

>> No.14119826

>>14112943
retroactively, Heraclitus

>> No.14119834

Aquinas
Pascal
Chesterton

>> No.14119850

>>14119826
*preemptively

>> No.14119859

>>14118236
That's an incredibly pedantic "point" but then again this is /lit/.

>> No.14119947

>>14112943
Jonagold
Crispin
Courtland

>> No.14120047

Emmanuel Levinas
Spinoza
The passionate highschool Philosophy teacher

>> No.14120086

>>14118280
based

>> No.14120175

Shankara
Zhuangzi
Plotinus

>> No.14120208
File: 167 KB, 729x729, 20191105_215015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14120208

>>14112943
Guenon
Wittgenstein
Kierkegaard

>> No.14120347

Diogenes, faggots.

>> No.14120445

>>14112943
Godel
Siddhartha
Wittgenstein

>> No.14120832

>>14112997
Based

>> No.14120838

>>14119859
The distinction seems to matter, since you confused that other guy by referring to a novel.

>> No.14120879

>>14112943
Plato
Kierkegaard
Heidegger

>> No.14120899

>>14116513
What the hell is with this 'Derrida contradicts himself' meme

>> No.14121027

>Plato
>Plotinus
>Heidegger

>> No.14121752

>>14118252

too patrician for /lit/

>> No.14121754

Parmenides
Hegel
Dogen

>> No.14122113

>>14112943
Plato
Aristotle
Plotinus
Pretty easy.