/lit/ - Literature

>>13732891
its right but only if loli is involved

>>13732891
Because it goes against both the ends of familial relationships and those of sex.

>>13732891
>>13732896
>>13732900
not literature
kill yourselves

>>13732900
This.

>>13732891
a pragmatic argument is that it increases the risk of the child conceived of such a union being retard exponentially

>>13732908
>exponentially

More like marginally, and only after several generations

>>13732891
You think it's not all that bad when you conceive of it as some adult brother/sister scenario, but in actuality the normalization of incest would result in tremendous amounts of sexual abuse of children by their parents, older siblings, relatives, or anyone else who can exercise coercive power over them.

>>13732915

>>13732902
Meant to post a pic of Ada or Ardor sorry

>>13732908
If its the first generation, its less risky than having a kid with a 35 year old woman. I don't

>>13732902
>visual NOVEL
>not literature
hurr

>>13732908
Is it moral if one of the partners is sterile?

>>13732891
Read totem and tabu.

>>13732918
That makes coercive power dynamics morally wrong, not incest

>>13732891

From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

2388 Incest designates intimate relations between relatives or in-laws within a degree that prohibits marriage between them.(Lev 18:7-20) St. Paul stigmatizes this especially grave offense: “It is actually reported that there is immorality among you... for a man is living with his father’s wife.... In the name of the Lord Jesus... you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh....” (1 Cor 5:1, 4-5) Incest corrupts family relationships and marks a regression toward animality. (2356, 2207)

>>13732918
sex with minors wrong

>>13732962
Cathcucks are literal gay pedos who are activelly trying to destroy europe
Anything they say is trash

>>13732900
It's not like the familial bond breaks, it might get stronger if anything. I imagine the sex would be great too because of the taboo. The risk of defects isn't that high the first time so it's probably okay to do now and then. All life is really self cannibalizing and incestuous, incest isn't any more disgusting. If anything it's the truer form of the male-female relationship, look at how the dynamics of relationships reflect familial ones. Look at all the incest in mythology. It's wrong because all that is material is wrong; it's not worse than regular relationships, just more conspicuous. It's the most realized expression in humanity of the divine relationship, the most apt parody.

Violates the biological imperative

>>13732954
>>13732969
You don't get what I'm saying. You're taking a relation that is by its nature non-sexual, and removing the taboos that keep sexuality out of it. Normalizing incest normalizes sexual feelings between family members. You're taking something (incest) which only exists within the realm of sexual abuse and making it normal. And abuse is what it's going to cause.

>>13733001
>only exists within the realm of sexual abuse
Source?

BrotherxSister is obviously bad incest but what about CousinxCousin?

>>13733011
>CousinxCousin
not even real incest

>>13733011
>BrotherxSister is obviously bad incest

>>13733011
>BrotherxSister is obviously bad incest

>>13733028
>>13733033
Did you fuck your sister yet?

>>13732987
It doesn't

>>13733011
>cousinxcousin incest is viewed as bad by society just like other forms of incest
>not taboo enough for incest fetishists who look up momxson and brotherxsister porn
I think not enough people happen to have hot cousins to relate to

>>13733011
>BrotherxSister is obviously bad
Why?