[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 1.35 MB, 1200x1200, philosophygoblin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13724612 No.13724612 [Reply] [Original]

What are the best, fundamental, substantive criticisms of Kant's theoretical philosophy?

>> No.13724616

>>13724612
He liked to roll up in a burrito blanket and would have his servants do it so tightly he would occasionally shit himself.

>> No.13724627

>>13724616
Makes him more right if anything

>> No.13724628
File: 30 KB, 576x206, 1473070703028.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13724628

>>13724612

>> No.13724638
File: 226 KB, 500x603, A860915F-06CA-4127-B743-6FE43A936050.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13724638

>>13724612
He was a little goblin man.

>> No.13724650

>>13724612
If some concepts really are transcendental, then isn't it quite strange to explain it at all?
I think Wittgenstein well pointed it out. To wittgenstein every shit is transcendental, even logic is transcendental, and logical proposition is not explained, but only showed.

>> No.13724683

>>13724612
>>13724628
>creates a thread to make a shitty samefag meme XD

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique_of_the_Kantian_Philosophy

>> No.13724695

>>13724612
There is none because he is too powerful
>>13724616
Liking tightness and being squeezed is a telltale sign of autism
>>13724628
>>13724638
Short men are more efficient and superior (there will only be small 5 feet tall men in the future) which only further shows Kant's superiority.

>> No.13724703

>>13724695
>t. retard who never read kant

>> No.13724706

>>13724650
Did anyone ever formulate this criticism who was familiar with Kant/a Kantian?

>>13724683
I'm not samefagging. I don't regard Schopenhauer's criticism to be fundamental. Schopenhauer is a Kantian who at times had some genuine insight pertaining to the particularities of Kantian philosophy and who at other times used a Kantian strawman to illustrate his own ideas.

>> No.13724720

>>13724706
>I don't regard Schopenhauer's criticism to be fundamental
>post a criticism that i like XD

>> No.13724735

>>13724612
Read Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, JS Mill, Anscombe, MacIntyre, Williams, Foot

>> No.13724801

>>13724735
He said theoretical philosophy

>> No.13725269

Whitehead/Deleuze. Read Deleuze's lectures, Whitehead's response to Kant, and that book on Deleuze's critique of representationalism (red cover, forgot the name, it's very dense)

>> No.13725284

>>13724695
>Liking tightness and being squeezed is a telltale sign of autism
fuckkkkk