/lit/ - Literature

>>13640540
Pretty good, still like the start with the Americans chart more

>>13640540
Have been reading white noise, really is quite good and succinct for PoMo literature.

Give it to me straight: is Bleeding Edge really that bad? Because, that really bums me out if Pynch is going to go out like that.

>>13640745
Cringe.
>>13640751
>doomerism and edginess
Zoomer retardation.

Is there a linguistics chart?
>>13640758
>is Bleeding Edge really that bad?
Yes.
>really bums me out if Pych is going to go out like that.
He still writes. Every author has their duds. Just you wait, we'll get another Against the Day.

>>13640745
Paul Tilich any good?

>>13640540

>>13641388

>>13641395

>>13641402

>>13641407

any horror charts?

>>13641388
>2 books on the crusades
>2 books on the fucking templars

>>13640589
Patrician taste

>>13641584
Am I (>>13641579) a joke to you?

>>13641407
math major here, this is fucking nonsense

>>13642823
Why? Do you have any specific recommendations?

>>13641395
Thank you

>>13642823
Right? Starting with proofs before going to basic math...who made this?

>>13640751
how the fuck do you faggots even know José Donoso??

>>13643870
>how does a lit board know about famous authors?

>>13640540
I made that chart. Wasn’t a fan of how it turned out. I was going to make a better version of it, but then the meme died.

>>13641402
>nothing on literally any form of paganism

>>13641388
Voragine is not history but quite fantasist at times.
The Bollandists are far superior, history-wise.

>>13643939
if you ever make a new one, Lasch's Culture of Narcissism definitely needs to be on there

>>13644234
Huck finn should never be recommended.

>>13644237
Too racist huh?

>>13644204
I had Regan’s election as the starting point. My problem was that the period of time was too broad. I was thinking of making about five charts from the 70s (proto-burgerpunk) to the 2016 election and including movies, television, and music too.

Does anyone have a chart for starting with the Greeks philosophy-wise?

>>13641579
based

>>13644280
No, the ending was just shit.

>>13641402

So Ghazalis Revival of Religous Learnings didn’t make the cut for Islam?

>>13643818
The /lit/ starter pack is high school?

I read a book about the history of religion and the relationship between that history and the discoveries of modern science. Idk in my opinion it was such a great piece of work and written only last year but literally no one I talk to has heard of it. It’s called Introspective Rationale anyone heard of it?

The Chad "Starting with the Americans" versus The Virgin "Starting with the Greeks"

>>13641579
ok thats f*cking epic and redpilled

Can somebody post a Ulysses prereading chart?

>>13647009
New Dark Age is really good

>>13640751
Is Pig Island good? The plot summary catched my attention.

Looking for chart about Islam

>>13647009

>>13644702
No, but just go in chronological order. Pre-Socratic, Plato, Aristotle, Hellenistic schools, Neo-Platonism. Read a summary, then pick authors/books/topics that interest you.
Charts are a spook.

>>13647933
Many thanks тoвapищ

>>13640751
Here is the most recent version!

>>13647933
>Not including Madame Bovary

Bump

>>13644702
>>13648604
the only presocratic worth reading is Heraclitus.

>>13647933
>Summa Theologica
nani

>>13649973
It's to get background on what comes later. Reading a summary would be fine. It's all just scraps anyway.

>>13641413
>western leftism

Bump

>>13643835
>>13642823
this guy is correct, did math in undergrad, ee for doctorate.

>>13642905
look up your local state uni's core curriculum. work through the textbooks and posted exams and exercises on course websites.

>>13649889
>The Room

Is Bowling Alone good? I just started bowling, and I'm loving it. My average right now is about 130, so I'm trying to improve.

>>13641579
No Ben Shapiro books? You are a commie shill aren't you?

>>13645777
It's a meme chart, Judaism doesn't have the Mishna in this image for example, or any of Maimonides's works.

>>13642823

Same and this

>>13642905

You have to understand that you can't understand mathematics, especially advanced mathematics, just by reading several books. There's a reason there's taught degrees in the stuff, you have to go through the concepts and learn them through exercises in the proscribed order. The other anon's suggestion to go through your local college math curriculum is good, but it's not really something you can just do on the side

Bump

Bump

Bump

>>13649889

>>13643870
i am pretty sure mutts hang out here.

These thumbnails on my phone are tiny! Sorry if these are (((charts)))

>>13655445
>>13655474

Any charts for crime or noir literature?

I am only asking if there is one, not demanding one before someone gives me a bitchy answer to make my own.

>>13655499
>poetics of space
that's philosophy, not architecture

>>13655894
Yeah I just collect these to give me a starting point for my homeschool research.

any psychology ?

>>13655440
what does that even mean?

Bump

Does anyone have the /his/ history overview infographic? Couldnt find it online

>>13649889
I've read Almost Transparent Blue, what am I in for with In the Miso Soup?