[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 139 KB, 736x906, 1550969324126.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13588701 No.13588701[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

They are instinctually programmed to assign truth to anything anyone says in their trusted social sphere with no thought or judgement at all.

Because they had to watch over others constantly since the beginning of humanity, they became selfless. Because they were so close to all the needs and wants of their people, they developed the instinct to trust them absolutely and a true understanding of their people was taken for granted.
Their bodies and minds became dedicated to nourishing their communities. They would listen to the men speaking of what they've done in the wide world and translate the substance to emotional terms that can be understood by other women, and so used to guide the behavior of the children.
When they were relieved of many responsibilities to their people by the 'modernization' of society the trait of selflessness became hollow and so turned to nothing but self-unawareness, leaving the instinct to implicitly trust their social sphere intact to be turned to purposes other than what made it to begin with.

With the addition of 'the media' to modern society, with all of its inherent falsehoods, women are turned completely against their own nature.
Their nurturing instincts are used to nurture the interests of the upper classes as handed down from the media rather than those of the people they see and interact with every day, even their own children.
Instead of being warm with compassion they are cold with judgement calculated from the information they are brainwashed with; willing to go to any length to make their friends and families conform to the dictates of the elite.

So it is that women are the primary tool of the elite to control us all, because men will do anything for their women.
So it is that love is turned against us and the very foundation of our existence is betrayed.

This is the great vulnerability in the mind of the human that is exploited to make empire by slavery.

The only solution is to overpower women completely; to overcome and/or capture the elite's front-line soldiers at any cost.
Life begins with women, without dealing with them you can't do anything at all and all planning is worthless.
This is not a matter of personal responsibility. This is an aberration of society and it requires an organized collective solution.
Men everywhere have to band together in confederated groups, decide on what the law should be, and enforce it autonomously.
By setting our minds on this goal and accomplishing it we will gain the strength to contend with the next battle - 'politics'.

You will never accomplish anything other than the total loss of your humanity by continuing to work under this system.

Another day, another cunt.

>> No.13588719
File: 148 KB, 707x1264, 1560340640589.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13588719

>>13588701
What do you do if you naturally developed into this as a male?

>> No.13588726

t. Cumbrain OP

>> No.13588737

>>13588701
Oh look, another misogynistic effortpost that doesn’t even attempt to back up its claims with substantiated evidence. Why do you guys always lean on cultural expectations of women (IE. the “nurturers of society”) when trying to make an objective claim about how men and women REALLY interact? This kind of analysis is inevitably riddled with subjective contamination.

>> No.13588753

>>13588737
>implying philosophical argument should be backed up by its substantiated evidence

>> No.13588765

>>13588753
He’s not making a philosophical argument though, his very first claim is literally about female psychology, which he then drops almost immediately to talk about societal expectations as though they are objective metrics for gauging how a woman should behave.

>> No.13588788

>>13588737
>Why do you guys always lean on biological expectations of women

>>13588765
>>13588765
well I am though. I partially explained the evolutionary course of sexual dimorphism in humans.
I guess I wrote this thinking that anyone who can read it understands basic biology.

>> No.13588807

I guess I will rewrite this, the lack of knowledge, the lack of willing mind, toward biological perception, is really staggering.
This is how you set your mind free and enable a waterfall of original information from first and observations.
You just aren't living.

in an 'evolutionary' timescale:
>women have bodies unsuited for exploration or contest or prolonged travel
>humans deal with tons of information constantly
>women have to deal with information about things they have never seen and probably never will
>are they either going to evolve more trust or more critical filter?

why is this even a question? what about this situation don't you understand?
please, honestly, help me understand so I can write a better preface

>> No.13588809
File: 133 KB, 1221x717, 1564862108814.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13588809

It's 3 days this borderline murderous ticking timebomb incel spams this pasta on this board.
Just ignore him I already did my duty

>> No.13588812

>>13588788
But what you’re doing is constructing a teleology out of the expectation that women’s roles in society should be prescribed by biology, which is a pretty obvious is/ought fallacy. I don’t need to understand biology to know you’re full of shit.

>> No.13588840

>>13588812
no
the teleology is objective
the roles are literally prescribed
have you heard of DNA? what about epigenetic mechanisms?

I am constructing a description, not an ideal.

>I don’t need to understand biology
>I'm comfortable in totality of ignorance

>which is a pretty obvious is/ought fallacy
then you could have taken the time to make an argument instead of blowing so hard

>> No.13588851

>>13588809
Remember one of the last threads when I said I had a gun?
Just look how misguided I am.
Just look at the HATRED and ANGER I must have.

I'm getting so angry. I carry my guns with me everywhere.
On an unrelated note, I'm currently heading to a highly populated area.

>> No.13588870

>>13588851
>I'm lonely pls send police
jej

>> No.13588881

Fuck off incel

>>>/r9k/

>> No.13588887

>>13588851
Why you don't just chill trust me not all women are like that.
It's a gross generalization that is true most of the time but it's not fucking always the case. It's the same shit of saying all men are pigs and rapists.