[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 111 KB, 800x533, 50D4B5F4-AD9B-4308-B821-AD1A3E552356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13346723 No.13346723 [Reply] [Original]

What is the most /lit/ field of science? (Math included)

>> No.13346730

>>13346723
combinatorics

>> No.13346823

>>13346730
Isn't that the one with the Haruhi problem?

>> No.13346895

Most /lit/: pure math
Least /lit/: 'Computer' ''''Science''''
All good philosophers were also mathematicians
No good philosopher ever bothered with the technical aspscts of a machine

>> No.13346945

>>13346723
How about medicine? Many great writers were also doctors

>> No.13347457
File: 112 KB, 1280x720, E2A8557A-0B65-437A-A112-8E7B7157A94F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13347457

>>13346723
Statistics

>> No.13347458

>>13346945
Name 3

>> No.13347465

>>13347457
Why should i trust you when you post fat animes girls)

>> No.13347547

Gender studies

>> No.13347562

Aristology

>> No.13347569

Zymurgy

>> No.13347573

Philology

>> No.13347586

A fallow one.

>> No.13347594
File: 31 KB, 759x420, 81D52F18-93DD-4D32-A0E5-15A1E49FFE8A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13347594

>>13346723
Sociology

>> No.13347595

most /lit/: biology
least /lit/: chemistry

>> No.13347604

Literature is just applied speculative chemistry, so it's already scientific.

>> No.13347609

>>13347458
Chekov
Louis Ferdinand Celine
Arthur Conan Doyle
Even Schopenhauer studied medicine for a year

>> No.13347699

>>13346895
Actual computer science is very much /lit/, it's only in recent times it's become commonplace to conflate computer science and computer engineering.

>> No.13348026

>>13347609
Okay, you win.

>> No.13348157

>>13347465
Because statistics is based.

>> No.13348554
File: 51 KB, 630x400, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13348554

>>13347457
>>13348157
Based anon.

>> No.13348576

Metaphorology

>> No.13349502

>>13348576
Is this real?

>> No.13349526
File: 302 KB, 710x823, 9E95B956-1B36-46F4-98F8-BA0ABDB4612E.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13349526

Metaphysics.
If you can understand metaphysics, you’re already above most people on /lit/

>> No.13349755

>>13349502
Actually yes. My friend took a philosophy course based on a book about metaphorology. Seems interesting.

>> No.13349765

>>13349526
Based terry pratchett reference

>> No.13349861

>>13346723
history of science
read Thomas Kuhn plebs

>> No.13350107

>>13349861
That's not science in itself, but just history and philosophy (particularly Kuhn)

>> No.13350570

>>13346730
fpbp

>> No.13351717

>>13347699
computer engineering is being bunched up with computer science now? baka!

>> No.13353121

>>13347594
not science

>> No.13353135
File: 194 KB, 407x510, 1511328826644.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13353135

>>13346723
Literature

>> No.13353157
File: 95 KB, 640x577, 162D7EC6-240D-4A65-B452-FB8E58E2053A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13353157

Reflexology. Many great writers had foot fetishes. Theres nothing more beautiful in life than pleasing a cute girl or guy by touching their feets.

>> No.13353609
File: 94 KB, 600x896, Science+Art.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13353609

>>13353121
That's the point

>> No.13354513

>>13353609
Still not science

>> No.13354515

>>13347609
>Arthur Conan Doyle
loooool

>> No.13354526

>>13347604
Based

>> No.13354603

>>13346723
>(Math included)

>> No.13354610

Lepidoptery

>> No.13354751

>>13354513
>i win i win
The Being Dumb Award goes to you everyday, dear.

>> No.13354876

>>13354515
The good man entertained thousands of not millions of people with his works that, although not the most complicated, are still well thought out and nicely written. What have you brought the world anon? Or are you just an internet snob who's entire self image comes from reading difficult books?

>> No.13355115

>>13354751
It still isnt a science no matter how much you bitch and moan to me

>> No.13355153

>>13349861
t. chicago grad
>>13347595
>>13347699

computer science is a mathematics over a subset of problems, such as decision problems, combinatorics, algorithm proofs, etc.
P=NP is a question of humanism, namely, which efforts in problem solving are futile and which are efficient?
our understanding of mechanical computation as formalized by turing and church, along with Gödel’s discoveries in mathematical logic (to an extent, formal language theory) have raised the most profound questions of the 20th century, namely, what is reason, what are the limits of reason, what is it to think, and what is it that makes us human? (crossover to chomsky here, etc)

the famous quote: computers are as relevant to computer science as telescopes are to astronomy

>> No.13355186

>>13355115
Sociology is a science faggot it’s a social science why are you so confident being stupid

>> No.13355262

>>13355186
social sciences arent real sciences. theyre pseudosciences. only natural sciences are real sciences.

>> No.13355276

>>13355262
And?

But your head needs a Real Science mascot for literature, I guess. Dumb thread.

>> No.13355299

>>13355276
stop posting in it then, crybaby

>> No.13355338

>>13353609
What's with all the shitskins in your picture and purple-haired dykes in your little comic, sweetie? There's even a blond nigger!

>> No.13355840

>>13346723
Anything involving logic

>> No.13355856

Most Chad : finance

>> No.13356578
File: 75 KB, 640x427, BD04778B-6DCD-4A07-A243-E7C9D6822F99.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13356578

>>13355338
Artists are goofy like that.

>>13355299
I’m not the one crying.

>> No.13356673
File: 59 KB, 320x383, 8B591DBD-541E-488E-AF3D-2E986782CD77.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13356673

>>13356578
>im not the one crying
>Y-YOU SAID MY SPECIAL SNOWFLAKE SOCIAL SCIENCE ISNT REAL SCIENCE!! THIS THREAD IS SO DUMB WAAAH

>> No.13356694

>>13356673
Nice self portrait, crybaby.

>> No.13356696

>>13346723
It's gotta be physics. Math is /lit/ in that it's full of pretentious people who self congratulate themselves on knowledge that isn't popular to seek out. If we are talking about beauty that is agreed upon by most of humanity, then physics fits the bill because of, well, "poetry in motion".

>> No.13356717
File: 32 KB, 740x308, 1542476387436.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13356717

>>13356696
t. physics major
nothing is as pure and beautiful as mathematics

>> No.13356740

>>13356694
Weak. Anyways, thanks for keeping my thread alive by repeatedly bumping it. Oh, and remember, any reply you give me enables me to bump it again myself!

>> No.13356741

>>13356717
t. the anon you're replying to
I'm interested in why you think that. The word 'pure' to me doesn't necessarily imply beauty, and a lot of literature is 'impure' and beautiful at the same time. 'Beauty' to me is a measure of the ability to strike a human in a way that causes them to pause. Within that framework, I just can't see how Mathematics has a one-up on Physics, even if Physics uses Mathematics to predict happenings. To me, Mathematics is just too far removed from everyday experience to be called universally 'beautiful'.

>> No.13356836

Pure mathematics

>> No.13356862

>>13356673
AND I SAID THAT THAT WAS THE POINT

LEARN TO FUCKING READ, BITCHTITS

>>13356694
Surely that’s a caricature of Moby.

>>13356740
Not me. And I don’t care.

>>13356836
See? It doesn’t make sense. The most lit field of science? Mathematics?

>> No.13356928

>>13356741
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_beauty

>> No.13356974

>>13356928
you fucking retard, I gave you my thoughts on this exact idea and you just drop a link like that, referencing what I'm using in my explanation. You just added a footnote to what I said about mathematical beauty. What the fuck even is /lit/ at this point? You're un-nuanced as a thinker and you're never going to generate even a single unique idea that could have any positive effect within yourself, leave alone others.

>> No.13357151

>>13356974
I'm the person you were replying to before and not the one who posted that link. Unfortunately, what you've said about me is still true.

>> No.13357412
File: 41 KB, 800x531, kelvihelmholtz3_big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13357412

>>13356974
Theres no need to be upset, anon. I read what you posted and remembered the article, thought it was a good read for anyone interested in the discussion.
Here, have a pretty picture you can jerk off to.

>> No.13357503

>>13357412
Nice cloud formation anon.

>> No.13357933

>>13356862
y i k e s

>> No.13357935

>>13346723
Fundamental and applied linguistics

>> No.13358815

>>13357935
What makes you say this?

>> No.13358819

Quantum physics

>> No.13358944

>>13346723
Statistical Physics

>> No.13359795

>>13358944
Elaborate.

>> No.13359830

>>13355153
are you actually retarded

>> No.13359848

>>13356741
>Mathematics is just too far removed from everyday experience to be called universally 'beautiful'.
That's such an Algebraist thing to say, pretty much the entire foundations of Analysis are inspired by everyday experiences.

>> No.13359860

>>13346723
To me literature is the communication of the authentic.
If it does not engage the real community of people then it isn't literature.
As such I'd have to put civil engineering as the most lit science.

>> No.13360017

Biology is pure surrealism

>> No.13360220

>>13360017
Explain.

>> No.13360508

>>13347609
Also Rabelais.

>>13346895
Theoretical computer science is pretty much a branch of pure mathematics.
>No good philosopher ever bothered with the technical aspscts of a machine
Who is Pascal?

>> No.13360536

>>13356696
Except that poetry is written in mathematics (and the physical reality is often much uglier and more irregular than the mathematics describing them, amusingly).

Remember that Feynman himself pointed out that if you get into physics for the aesthetics you're a brainlet. Physics is about working descriptions of reality, beauty is very secondary there, while it is central in mathematics.

>> No.13360551

>>13356741
Mathematics isn't really more removed from everyday experience than physics. Most of the physical theories that get people wet (relativity, quantum mechanics, to a lesser extent event chaos theory) only applies in extreme conditions you scarcely witness in daily life. While there is profond mathematics in addition. Heck there are even pre-mathematical intuition in apes and some birds.

You could also say things like atomic chemistry explain the workings of daily life phenomena, but thena gain this also applies, to an even greater extent to a good deal of mathematics discovered before the nineteenth century.

Ultimately the border between those two if very badly guarded, if at all.

>> No.13360560

>>13360220
when you take smaller and smaller parts out of the context of the whole and give them ridiculous names it can get pretty whacky

>> No.13360582

it’s electrical engineering

>> No.13360712

Anticipatory systems theory

>> No.13360753

>>13346895
Computer science is one of the most philosophically relevant fields. Tons of early computer scientists were also both pure mathematicians and philosophers.

>> No.13360769
File: 84 KB, 1902x161, 1560935696662.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13360769

>>13346723
>2019
>science

>> No.13360826

>>13360551
based anon. i see too many retarded normans that complain about math being 'useless' but they fucking love science and muh exploration! it's pure propaganda