/lit/ - Literature

>>13268611
Yeah, but the only truth about secrets that I'll be worried about is where I your the body.

>>13268611
Have any of you ever gone to a book signing?

>>13268621
What counts as a book signing?

>>13268627
An author has a book signing and you attend

>>13268627
If you invite the authoress to your hotel room for platonic massages and you "sign" her with Sharpies, does that fall under the same general umbrella?

Will you be removing your shoes and socks at this book signing?

>>13268658
>oh noes a girl is independent how horribles

>>13268658
Is this Savannah's crazy ex who said he'd make a necklace of her bronzed toes?

>>13268658
>some bitch being "selfless" and putting others "first" is supposed to be better
this is an empty fucking shrew

is her writing as nice as her legs??

>>13268677
Why do authoresses insist on flaunting their bare feet? It really is quite vexing...

>>13268611
>>13268664
This. First and last mistake female authors make is closed-toe shoes. Even if they catch on and start a foot-forward Kstew or Bella Thorne marketing push, foot-conscious audiences move on to the next pair of tootsies with brutal fickleness. It's totally unfair to the author let alone the readers who spent money on a woman's book in the hopes of scoping somebIRL toe cleavage or shoe-dangling performances at a signing.

>>13268687
>>13268611
This. First and last mistake female authors make is closed-toe shoes. Even if they catch on and start a foot-forward Kstew or Bella Thorne marketing push, foot-conscious audiences move on to the next pair of tootsies with brutal fickleness. It's totally unfair to the author let alone the readers who spent money on a woman's book in the hopes of scoping some IRL toe cleavage or shoe-dangling performances at a signing. The Iowa Writers Workshop has a now notoriously prejudicial anti-footsexual dress code, meant to stimey aesthetically inclined authors and authoresses in favor of the broader international audience that is much more interested in glutes and mammaries.

>>13268677
It's tough to grasp her struggles with "embroidery" without her freshly pedicured feet in the frame, although not being a Zoomer I have no sense of what demoralizing activity or pastime "embroidery" must refer to in this forsaken day and age.

>>13268664
Counterintuitive to the uninitiated, the decision by a pedally gifted woman to don such voluminous socks and laced shoes is almost always motivated by the preservation of her feets' trademark funks, the homeostasis of her aroma-generating bacteria being a delicate balance between filth and dermatological danger.

>>13268611
wow what a cute endearing princess you are, my sweet - just inspiring!

>>13268672
Yeah, independent of,all virtue, independent of God.

>>13268672
>Thirst traps set me free!

So many ughs and oofs ITT