[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 171 KB, 900x1800, 1291231774493.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Dec 1 14:48:57 2010 No.1324850 [DELETED]

[DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

What did you notice first, /lit/, the title of the book or her young nubile breasts?

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 1 14:50:57 2010 No.1324854 Isn't 'young' already inherent in 'nubile'?

>>	John !rAOwMGYtnY Wed Dec 1 14:51:57 2010 No.1324857 >>1324854 Yeah, if you're going to string adjectives together you'd better not use a thesaurus to do it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 1 14:53:57 2010 No.1324863 >>1324854 >>1324857 Your both wrong.

>>	John !rAOwMGYtnY Wed Dec 1 14:56:57 2010 No.1324868 >>1324863 http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nubile >used of a young woman

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 1 14:56:57 2010 No.1324869 >>1324863 No your wrong. Nubility implies youthfulness. Plus "inherent" was the wrong choice there. "Implied" would have worked much better.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 1 14:57:57 2010 No.1324871 >>1324863 Seeing as this is /lit/ and the last two replies didn't point this obvious punctuation fallacy out, I'm going to say troll.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 1 15:01:57 2010 No.1324876 File: 11 KB, 456x439, ololoshenki.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >mfw celebrities think that reading "Lolita" in their 30s will make them look smart

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 1 15:01:57 2010 No.1324881 >>1324871 >punctuation fallacy >fallacy Now whose the troll, biatch?

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 1 15:03:57 2010 No.1324884 File: 74 KB, 540x360, 1178665057118.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >nubile >from Latin nubilis (marriageable) >marriageable breasts