/lit/ - Literature

Fuck doomers and fuck incels

>>13220891

Based

>>13220891
Why is Steppenwolf on this?

>>13220874
Bunin is fucking great. He's really talked about though I feel.

>>13220937
I only read The Village and feel like it wasn't the best way to start. Should have started with short stories?

>>13220900
It’s ultimately a life-affirming book.

>>13220874
S O L A R I S

>>13220891
Can you blame for being a doomer, when my life is in hole and the world is literal on fire. Times are definitely better than the past, but I feel like we are nearing the end of humanity as we know it.

>>13221027
Should I start with steppenwolf? Or is it somehow different than most of the other books on the chart?

>>13221096
Fuck doomers

>>13221035
Solaris is written by a Polish author.

>>13221180
GTFO sci fag

>>13221147
tfw got busted importing one of those into the UK

>>13221187

>>13221147
I liked it when I was young. Many of its ideas resonated with me, and the proto-psychedelic is elements are pretty fun, but today I’m too cynical to enjoy it. I’d only recommend it if you can still see any potential within yourself.

>>13221194
What did they do? UK fag here and kind of want one.

>>13221220
>Lady MacBeth of the Mtsensk Disctrict is not on the list

>>13221235
How much Dosto do you want on one chart?

>>13220874

any poetry charts?

>>13221381
i got you famalam

>>13221096
Go for a fucking walk bro

>>13221381

>>13221381
last one

>>13221096
Just because your life is shit doesn't mean that the world must be the same way. You're a narcissist like most doomer fags. You don't know what true suffering entails.

Looking for a chart I saw on /lit/ ranking publishers, can anyone help?

Is it normal for fiction to have degenerate themes like in The Sailor who fell from Grace with the Sea? Where kid masturbates to his mother? I understand the reasoning behind it but is it normal to think of it as degenerate and unnecessary or am I too prudish?

>>13221458
Too prudish, but yes, some books can be over the top and it’s important to recognize when an author is using scenes like this to convey a deeper meaning and when an author is just trying to be shocking

>>13221035
>Solaris
>Russian
That's dumb even for ameritard

>>13221184
Is there one like this for WW2?

>>13221490
This the best I could find

>>13221484
Well I mean I can understand Mishima's reasoning behind it which is very Japanese in a way, suppose I'm looking at it from too much of a European view. It's been a while since I read it and I have ADD and reading 10 books at a time so I will be a bit rusty but he used it to convey the sense of duality within man and its convergence to a desire of longing. Although like many artists the meaning is secondary to the "feeling" of the form and so to overly define this meaning of expression would overcome the conveyance of the art form which is the said "feeling" of the book. Tarkovsky was over the top with this but it is a good example for how obvious he made this fact in his films, take Stalker for example: it focuses around meaning and purpose in the meaningless world without defining it anymore than this as it exists to simply enhance the feeling of the film.

But at what point anon would you say degeneracy should not be contained within a book? I am speaking of the degeneracy which still has purpose for the story but not shock factor. Surely there must be a cut off? In an ideal society there may be a book of a paedophile and a rape of a child may be used purposefully to describe this man in a better light. Would then we remove such a book or such a part of a book? Same question goes for all forms of art anon.

>>13221529
an artist can do whatever they think is necessary to express their art

>>13221560
But you are not thinking for the sake of the collective anon. There is no doubt the point between art and propaganda mingle joyously.

>>13221560
>>13221568
As well anon he may use whatever he may think is necessary but that will not mean there are not consequences for publication.

>>13221568
sorry your fee-fees were hurt by a fictional scene in a book

>>13221573
oh, do tell me about the consequences. de sade remains mainstream and can be found in any library today despite these non-existent consequences of degenerate publishing you speak of

>>13221576
Why you so worked up anon? My "fee-fees" as you say were not hurt but simply judging. If you cannot handle judging you are about as insecure and effeminate as a high school girl on her period.

>>13221584
You are too blind to see them anon, you refuse to even acknowledge my point of propaganda. Do you think propaganda has no effect? If a book is written to express the beauty of child paedophilia how is it not simply a more advanced version of a sign in saying "Paedophilia is natural" in the respect of indoctrination? Look at this world anon, are you so blind you cannot see the effects of normalisation of degeneracy of a sexual kind in this example?

>>13221165
is this how to be a STEM Catholic?

>>13221664
the truth is, people with no sense of right or wrong will be inspired by any work of art. charles manson used the White Album to justify his beliefs for example. if you are so retarded to pick up a book about a pedophile and think "I NOW WANT TO FUCK A LITTLE GIRL" because of a sex scene with a child. that's a personal problem and you have no business reading

>>13221703
It was an exaggerated example you fool, because of its exaggeration the point still remains. Let us say it is not a book of such point but it simply contains that, what then you fool? How long until the reactionary fools find it and over a course of intent manifestation of this degeneracy society itself becomes degenerated? Even say if the book was so direct it would not inspire to make one "fuck a little girl" as you so idiotically said but give leniency to such a people where leniency should be no where to be found.

And yes it is true what you that people with no sense of right or wrong would be inspired by any work of art, however there must be a prime origin, whether it is from Manson telling them these things or it was found to be in a work of art (no matter how shitty) whether subtly or directly it does not change the point of the effectual. Would Manson not of been indoctrinated somehow? I would think I have business reading if it were to advocate for paedophilia.

>>13221764
definite 'degeneracy'

last time i checked, the progenitors of western civilization were pedophiles, hebephiles, and homosexual/bisexual, so clearly, these things are not correlated with society deteriorating in any way shape or form, but if anything, a return to greatness in a way

someone post the doki doki charts

>>13221412
Where does one start when learning about poetic theory?
I tried the book by Fussel in your chart but I am having some troubles since I am starting from absolute zero and

>>13221832
>definite 'degeneracy'
>last time i checked, the progenitors of western civilization were pedophiles, hebephiles, and homosexual/bisexual, so clearly, these things are not correlated with society deteriorating in any way shape or form, but if anything, a return to greatness in a way

Anon you have been beaten and now return to picking at small unnecessary details to fuel your ego. You are a degenerate who cannot accept the truth and so must defend it by rejecting all that is good in the name of "art". No worse than the faggots who claimed having sex in front of primary school children is "art". Just because your Daddy didn't fucking love you doesn't mean you have to be a degenerate anon.

A degeneracy is that which degenerates mankind is someway. A catabolic force you imbecile.

And please tell me who these progenitors of Western civilisation were that also happened to be as you say "pedophiles, hebephiles, and homosexual/bisexuals". And yes anon you know nothing the nature of a civilisation if you cannot see the signs and effects of sexual degeneration. At the collapse of Every empire by its own means it has been sexually degenerative, of all the great civilisations they have always been at their lowest and less creative point at their most sexually degenerate. Man becomes so focused with pleasure he is constrained by it, in his "liberation" he has become imprisoned. His wasting on individual pleasure and not the self sacrifice to that of the greater good. Training your concentration to that of the purposeless that does not escape the ego.

A degenerate must always rationalise his own faults, and this, this action has been at the heart of many contemporary ideology's and "art".

>>13221244
That's a Leskov novella you moron

>>13221907
>you have been beaten
Wrong, my opinion remains the same

>>13222150
>Wrong, my opinion remains the same
Absolute masterful refutation anon. But you do not realise that for you to be beaten neither requires your nor anyone else's mind to be changed.

>>13221027
Bruh just do drugs and fuck women. Sure it is douche.

is there a linguistics chart? and I mean actual hard linguistics, not pseudo-linguistic philosophy like fucking semiotics and structuralism

>>13222369
Someone needs to learn how to laugh.

>>13222317
Great, i don’t care. Society moves on without you.

>>13221096
Yes I can watch, quit being a faggot.

>>13221458
i regret to inform you but This post is off-topic.

Is there any chart that will help me get into whitehead?

>>13222688
Start with the indo-europeans, then the Greeks, then resume with the romans

>>13222638
Dance to the distortion slave

>>13221208
you felt all that over a sex toy?

>>13220900
because
GET YOUR MOTOR RUNNIN
HEAD OUT ON THE HIGHWAY

>>13220996
I've just read the short stories and found them very rewarding. Always wanted to read more of him

>>13222440
Seconded

>>13221407
>Start with Bukowski and work your way to Rime of the Ancient Mariner
What the fuck

is there a chart on aesthetics?

>>13222440
Came to this thread just to look for that as well

looking for a Land's or accelerationism chart

>>13220891
Thank you so much for posting this, I'm reading too much depressing stuff

>>13220874
>chekov short stories doesn't include "peasants", by far his best work
What sort of illiterate made this chart?

>>13224156
I'm not familiar with poetry. What makes that a "what the fuck?"

Does anyone have the recently made little girl chart?

>>13221184
Jorn Leonhard's recent anthology, Pandora's Box, is also a really good overview, but broader than any of these in scope so it probably wouldn't fit the chart

>>13221907
I can feel myself losing brain cells trying to read this. Consider putting down the thesaurus and actually reading something for once.

>>13221172
>that 1000 year gap between Augustus and the crusades
the enlightenment was a mistake

>>13224589
I think you mean the dark ages. Enlightenment brought back literature

>>13222138

I see this chart a lot, but how much of it is actual quality literature?

I enjoyed American Psycho, A Season in Hell, In the Miso Soup, and a couple others. But a lot of these books just seem like literary sensationalism.

>>13224751
All the works that went into fueling the enlightenment were collected, protected, catalogued and copied and translated during your "dark" ages.

>>13224772
>the thing that came before led into the thing that came after
amazing

>>13220874

The absurdity in the OP is the rhetorical suggestion that tasting food using one's feet is necessarily a massively reduced enterprise-a bad sensory metaphor left incomplete, so let us complete it. Well, no. One can for example pick up a fruit with one's foot and eat it, thereby getting the true flavor-albeit with the distraction of one's own feet. Likewise with a competent translator, the effect is largely carried over, with only some inconvenience.

>>13221194

You should overthrow your wrongful government, starting right at the top: murder the queen. she shows no signs of dying any time soon, and needs help in this. You can do it.

Also just murder british cops and politicians until they do away with the ridiculous TV license stuff.

>>13224814
>killing the queen because you're horny

>>13224771
Babyfucker might not be, and opinions on Story of the Eye are divided. Other than that, most of the works on this list are quality literature.

>>13224751
No, I mean the enlightenment. The dark age is called the dark age by people who were part of the enlightenment. They considered the age to be dark because society was almost solely held together by the church after Rome had fallen and minor plagues were sweeping across Europe every few dozen years.
This, in combination with their tendency to be protestant or at least born and raised in a protestant country, has caused enlightenment inspired historians/histories to be woefully lacking in anything pertaining to the middle ages. God forfuckingbid we discuss the Viking era. God forbid we discuss the rise of the Frankish kingdoms and the formation of the Holy Roman Empire. Shan't we ignore the slavic migrations southward as well? Fuck the Byzantines too. Ain't got time for anything except muh Augustus and muh crusades.
As for our list up there, they didn't even bother discussing the fall of the Roman empire, let alone any of the things I mentioned above. No Nero. No Caligula. No Marcus Aurelius. No Trajan. No Hadrian. No persecution of Christians. No Constantine. None of it.

Fuck. The. Enlightenment.

>>13225472
I hate how whan normi chos best anime, it's always gonna by titles where anime aesthetics will be as weak as possible

>>13221407
>Howl
dropped

>>13221412
Put it down and try the other four in the tier until one clicks, then go back to the others you had trouble with.

>>13225472
Haven't watched anime in years. What is worth picking up off this list?

>>13225472

>not including Great Teacher Onizuka

>>13225660
None. Read visuals novels instead.

>>13225660

nothing

>>13225505
no wonder. anime is shit. only those that feel like movies/tv series are decent.

>>13223343
I recommend adding Curzio Malaparte's Technique of Revolution and, more to the point, the fairly obscure Le Bonhomme Lénine - a biography of the man, pointing out the petit bourgeois roots of his thought, his actions and his rule.

>>13224524
>no mention of Bufalino's The Plague-Spreader's Tale

shame.

>>13225660
Ping Pong and Tatami Galaxy should be the first things you go for (Yuasa's god tier works, not sure how you saw Kaiba yet didn't watch those two). After that:
The Count of Monte Cristo (but only if you've read the book)
Jinrui wa Suitai Shimashita
Kemono no Souja Erin
Only Yesterday
Rose of Versailles
Giant Robo

>>13221180
We used Chemistry: The Central Science as our textbook for AP chem back in my senior year of high school. Based textbook.

>>13225774
>the one history book about nippon is the rape of nanking
It is by far the least interesting aspect of one of the most impressive and interesting countries on the globe. Going from backward feudal samurai-court to a full-fledged industrial naval power that dares to go toe-to-toe with the greatest military power on earth and wins, just 40 years after their modernization drive.
And you pick the one memetastic cringey soccermom/redneck hick topic to represent them.

Why is Hitler on there? Why is Bismarck on there? Obviously the only thing you need to read about is the torture during 30 years war and the 10 million rapes committed by germans on the eastern front. KYS.

>>13226116
>unqualified
>haphazard
There's the clue anon.

>>13226116
>and wins

>>13226140
American education sucks.

>>13226356
It sure does, but that doesn't mean Japan won the fucking war, weeb

>>13226443
he's talking about the Russo-Japanese war
don't know what he meant by "greatest military power" though

>>13226443
Which war are we talking about? Please show us that you are capable of some simple addition and subtraction; all the information is readily available in the post and as long as you are not historically illiterate it should be no problem to deduce the correct answer. Yes, they did indeed win that war.

Y'all need to be more consistent with actually listing what your charts are about.

>>13226473
You think the US qualified as the greatest military power pre-ww1? Only contenders worth talking about are Germany and Russia.

>>13226473
He meant this: >>>/k/41651627

Anyone got the ss-ahnenerbe one?

>>13222446
Is this meant as critique of the works or of the "tryhards"?

>>13224800
underrated post

>>13224800
what the fuck is this? it's great

>>13222138
Whoever made this chart is the GOAT

>>13222446
"Twenty-five popular books"

Anyone got music/music theory charts

>>13227214
Thanks man, it took me about a month to make

Can someone post the minimalist lit chart?

>>13221378
I enjoyed Justine. Where should I go next on this list?

/r/ing a chart for learning biology and physics

>>13221172
A terrible collection of books that do not give a good or balanced world view of human history

>>13222440
still want to see this

>>13228145
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki/Biology_Textbook_Recommendations
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki/Physics_Textbook_Recommendations

>>13220874
anyone have one of the /fit/ or self-improvement reading lists?

any charts on alchemy,or occult philosophy?

>>13228365

>>13222235
wtf they had the perfect opportunity to rank catch 22 at 22

Is there a chart for depression where nothing makes you happy anymore?

Excercising doesn't help, fapping doesn't, friends don't, anime doesn't. Everything I use to like doesn't help. I'm starting to panic because I don't want to do anything and nothing helps. I feel like I'm starting to get intrusive thoughts
Help

>>13228257
Why? Because it's too "western" or what?

>>13222235
Could you redo this chart but only with Illustrated Platinum Edition covers?

>>13222446
There's no way "At the Mountains of Madness" is namedropped. You should have put up the Lovecraft collected stories.

Do anybody have the latest top 100 list we made a couple of months ago?

>>13221096
The doomer posits most people as privileged and it makes them angry to think that they might not be deserving, and all the while they are likely griping about their own superiors. You're just low in the pecking order of these animals' world.

>>13230876
I was interested in reading Society of the Spectacle, is there anything I should read before hand?

>>13231001

>>13224193
Debord wasnt in the frankfurt school, He was a situationist, but if you mean it in the sense that he was writing a marxist critique of capitalism in the sense of the frankfurt school then sure whatever.

>>13221244
Where's the Fountainhead?

>>13225660
BASED AND REAL TASTE PILLED

>>13220891
Haven't seen this before - in case it's a new one thanks for sharing anon, love seeing what new charts this board comes up with

>>13231340
extremely stupid

wasn't worth the effort, but take this

>>13220891
is tbk really life affirming? everything i've read by dosto (cp, idiot, notes) has fucked my mind for a bit. he has such an curiously incredible way of picking at my insecurities and mental wounds.

>>13230919
anyone?

anyone got that chart where we roll for our next read?

>>13231669
I don't have it saved, but it's on the /lit/ wiki

>>13231673
There are a number you can use, like >>13223587

>>13231691
thanks anon

>>13223587
roll

Requesting chart on economy reads. Preferrably of both left and right wing stances.

>>13231001

>>13221025
>mfw ive only *heard of* one of these books

>>13231001

>>13231900
What are the major unifying takeaways from this list?

>>13231911
The true nature of Tigers duh.

>>13222446
>cat's cradle
The only acceptable reference is just saying "see the cat? see the cradle?" and maybe the bit about hoosiers if you're from Indiana. Otherwise there is nothing worthwhile to reference.

>>13225762
I'll give Tatami Galaxy a try, it seems interesting. Thanks anon.

>>13231001
What should I pick up off the dark/disturbing row to read next? Just finished All the ugly and wonderful things and enjoyed it quite a bit.

>>13226116
>the greatest military power on earth
lel, read pic related sometime weeb. a hilariously under equipped far eastern fleet led by a drunken carouser picked solely because of nepotism doesn't qualify as "the greatest military power on earth."

OKAY COMRADE I'M GOING TO SEND YOU TO SIBERIA ON THE NEXT TRAIN IF YOU DON'T GIVE ME A CHART ABOUT THE WW2 EASTERN FRONT RIGHT FUCKING NOW

>>13232250
>judging a landbased power by the strength of the divided and isolated parts of its navy halfway around the globe
I've read biographies on all the Romanovs and most Rurikids of note, why should I then go and buy some super general all-encompassing work? 95% of the time they bring nothing new to the table, brush past any serious developments with perhaps a shallow remark or two, and leave you unsatisfied and not much wiser than when you started reading. Red Tsar and Potemkin was good, so I have considered it just as a refresher, but I doubt it would delve much into the military might of Russia, its organization or military industries.

>>13232280
When Titans Clashed by Glantz for some serious academic history, Russia's War by Overy, Ivan's War or Beevor for something a bit more pop-his.

>>13222235
What is wrong with you?

>>13221180
> Programming by bjarne strostrup
> No Knuth
> No spivak
Is this some kind of joke? Your book recs are shit and you're shit and you should feel bad for existing

>>13232504
400-800USD just for a wank seems a bit excessive, though the Hamilton book is reasonably priced.

>>13228138

>>13230885
is this a joke

>>13221184
I love how “All Quiet on the Western Front” a very obvious novel that wasn’t even about the writer’s experience in the war says “first hand account.”

>>13221212

Based. Saved.

>>13233149
>not having read the book

>>13221503

I would buy all of these books just to put them on display in my living room. And then put a menorah on the book case just for lulz.

>>13221190
fuck off

>>13222317

>But you do not realise that for you to be beaten neither requires your nor anyone else's mind to be changed.

How can you beat someone at a game where there are no rules and no goal? There is no beating, there is just you beating off over your own posts on 4chan.

>>13225660
Vagabond, Shigurui, Suicide Island and it's not on that list but you should also read Homunculus.

>>13231001

>>13233326
>caring about Andorra or anything they've touched to literally any degree
cringe

>>13231931
If I had to pick 1 Sagan book to read, which?

>>13233512
none of them. that chart is garbage

>>13231911
Winnie the Pooh and Tigger too is superb.

>>13231600
if his other work is a poison, tbk is a panacea. Alyosha is a balm to all passions.

>>13231340

Based

>>13233326
Where's Joan Brossa?

>>13231600

Yeah Dostoyevsky is insane to read. The way he just lays out his character's flaws makes you feel like he wrote the book to make fun of you (notes from underground) or warn you (crime and punishment) personally

>>13222136
>>13222129
Thank you

>>13233858
who the fuck banned the Lorax? is this proof that conservatives were the real snowflakes all along?

>>13233858
WOW such evil white books! I will do my part to destroy all I see.

>>13224193
this chart is absolutely retarded

>>13233858
Who the fuck banned these books? And why? And where?

Also, you should have snuck Mein Kampf in there, kek.

>>13233326
>No Curial e Güelfa
>No Contes de l'Empordá
>No Contes D'Apeles Mestres
>No Mecanoscrit del segon orígen

>>13228257
>>13229896

not the op here but a chart >>13221172 that goes from:
romans -> crusades is insane, basically skipping everything straight to the early high medival era.

>then the list has no qualms of immediatly going into the 20th century after 2 fucking rows
>then goes and does 2 rows of just WW1 and the european poltical theater for the early 20th century
>then 1 row only for ww2, the cold war, AND the scramble for africa??
>then we go back to the exploration age(?) of late renaissance europe? just so we can shoehorn in some MURICA manifest destiny crap(?) along with mexican revolution-era history?

this chart is great at portraying the stereotype of the south-western american 'historian' who just gets a huge boner for the worldwars when they were a teen then goes and starts studying more history in tertiary level education then realizes 'oh man this isnt tanks and guns and politics of europe man what a drag'

Im not even a fucking historian, i am a casual myself and even i fucking know this list is moronic with a fucking random focus on this guy's pet topics.

also like if youre gonna just go balls deep into the WW's then at least give a good round general intro to the whole subject not just random sections of the wars
>no pacific theater, no africa theater for ww1 or 2

you know i just went up to see what was the title of this fucking chart and im not even surprised, garbage

>>13234040
>being mad at a general chart for being general
cry monkey bitch

>>13234067
>general chart
>proceeds to be the most ungeneral chart

Anyone have a chart or any recs for Romanian literature? I just started learning the language and would like to pick up pieces of culture/understanding.

>>13234315
The wiki in the sticky has a section of charts based on countries. Maybe there's a romainian one.

>>13224401
you learn RotAM in highschool

Any charts for when you want to Kill yourself?

>>13233963
There's this huge obsession in the USA with "banned" books and books love to claim being banned. Basically every time it was some mom who got a book taken out of a school library. Anne Frank got banned because she talked about her body at one point.

>>13233858
What did the Lorax even do? Why is the fucking giving tree banned? Wrinkle in time is banned??

>>13221397
>milton not at the highest tier

>>13234419
any of the above charts labelled "doomer" would work

>>13224814
hrist no - You'll end up like on of these third-world countries with no publicly funded TV.

Have you ever seen the kind of TV they put out in these places?

>>13221180
>"Calculus with Analytic Geometry" by Simmons
>not including "Analysis" by Tao
Here is where you belong to >>13234222

>>13221172
>going for pop-history
>no hibbert or norwich

>>13235259
But that just seems nihilistic. I want to kill myself. I’m not jaded

>>13235484
are we the same person? anyway, doomerlit is really all there is, I've looked and can't find anything else, sorry

>>13225768
Yep.Happiness is a choice after all.

>>13235488
Fuck, thanks anyways me.

>>13229917
I personally have heard it namedropped

>>13228138
If you're still using this chart, check out the new one: >>13222138

>>13221197
>How to Solve it: Modern Heuristics
Absolutely Based and beautiful

>>13233901
They were and are, the level of snowflakery on the left is a new phenomenon - normally it has been the right doing the whole identity politics shitbath, but now the left has joined in on the pigfest.

>>13220891
I wouldn't call Magic Mountain life-affirming. Maybe the dream part and Castorps conclusion to it, but it's still a reach.

Whats the best collection of Platos essential Dialogues other than the full collection?

>>13222136
good chart thank you

>>13222155
Why does the presidents club provide an introduction to how pointless things really are? I haven't read it, but the reviews I've seen seem to indicate only positive outcomes.

>>13220891
imagine being this faggot downloading epubs he’ll never read while waiting for funko to make Dosty pops

>>13221503
unironically who needs all these books about nazis grow tf up

>>13222129
not possible in current society grow tf up

>>13222155
>brainlet interpretation of The Stranger

yikes

>>13238955
Hitler died for your sins, anon!

>

>>13221172
>when you OD on great man theory

>>13239079

>>

>>13238955
Someone who's interested in history.

>>13221096
i can't see any fire from here

>>13233233
shame no one would ever see it, incel

Anyone got the postmodern lit chart?

New chart I made for another thread.

Horror story collections.

>>13233326
>Llibres

Fuck you. You are here forever.

>>13220891
>I am a cat
No, I'm sick of Japs writing books about cats to end up killing them in the last pages.

>>13221165
Or you could just real a short history of everything by bill Bryson. All that crap is covered by a grownup from the now times.

anyone got a legal chart?

>>13241276
You do realize that any illegal charts get removed, right? All the charts in this thread so far are legal under US law

>>13232221
Bastard out of Carolina

>>13228266
Are there any other DDLC girl charts?
Mainly asking if there is one for Yuri.

>>13241763

>>13231001
Here's the new version
>>13241849

>>13222144
lol

>>13231131
Why would it be on there? I love Objectivism as much as people hate it but even this is a stupid question. The Fountainhead is a book about collectivism in mans soul v individualism of the soul, but set by the perview of architecture. It offers no real architectural foundation for learning.

bump

>>13225660
Kokou no hito is great. I read it twice. I might be biased though because I like anything with mountains.

>>13222138
Thank you. Love you. So much.

>>13220891
sissyfag detected

>>13238876
>hile waiting for funko to make Dosty pops
a daring synthesis

Just finished this bad boy!

can someone post the nazbol chart

>>13225472
People who suck off Homunculus and completely ignore Ichi the Killer because it's "edgy" perplex me entirely. Homunculus is the actual "shock factor" manga while Ichi is practically the manga version of Bataille.