/lit/ - Literature

Butterfly go exercise with your collar on please. :3

>two continentals
They would agree metaphysics is interesting and everyone would clap

>>13226740
>Continental-analytical divide still holds value in 21st century philosophy.
Why would you post cringe, mans?

It would be an utter shitfest of worthless verbosity and intellectual fraud

>>13226740

Based

>>13226757

The only reason it wouldn't is because continental philosophy is dying academically (which is good)

land would talk to himself then zizek would talk to himself and they would proceed in that manner until satisfied

>>13226734
You are a bigger autist than she is.

>>13226733
Like Bobby Brown

>>13226733
oh wow a deleuzean v. a lacanian, i wonder...

>>13226825
>still thinking Nick is Deleuzean
He straight up said "the Jews might be behind it holy shit" on Twitter

Land would smoke a meth pipe and Zizek would snort a line of coke, then they'd talk about absolutely fucking nothing because they're both frauds.

Long Live Peterson!!

>>13227043
He still directly comes out of Deleuze. Idgaf about his personal uninspired boomer-troll ramblings, I care about how far he’s gone in theory wherein he’d disagree with Zizek right out the gate.

>>13227043
>you can't say the jews did it if you use deleuzian philosophy

>>13226733
WELL YOU SEE

>>13226733
Zizek would probably make a lot of jokes about Kant being an evil autist, but then he'd eventually concede that he does actually respect Land– if only because he is able to pose the only threat that could motivate the left out of inaction (he might also claim that Land is only playing the devil for this exact purpose).

Land would probably tease Zizek about his overdependence on hegel and inability to say anything substantially new, then proceed to divert the topic of discussion onto why bitcoin (or rather cryptocurrencies more generally) is the new, hip metaphysical model of the day

Lots of sniffing and scratching

Can't decide which of them is a worse writer

Fuck that, I want these two in a 4 hour long friendly conversation with each other. Both having done a little bit of research before hand.

https://vocaroo.com/i/s04tqNTXwdvx

>>13227497
>Can't decide which of them is a worse writer
depends on whether you prefer hegel and cocaine or lovecraft and amphetamines

>>13227519
kek

>>13227519
fucking based

Already happened.
>China? Mein Gott, is this our future?
Landfags btfo

>>13226768
explain?

>>13226757
Huh? Land is in the continental tradition mostly

>>13227202
could this poster be /ourguy/ lit?

>>13226733
Nick would ask Zizek if he's ever read Neuromancer, Zizek would say no, and then they'd sit in silence for an hour only interrupted by Zizek's occasional sniffing.

badly

>>13227137

>>13229988
looks like Gibson reads Zizek
https://mobile.twitter.com/greatdismal/status/1029401618654015488

I don't think Zizek would be able to field any rebuttal to Land's band of Accelerationism, other than to decry it as depressing and pessimistic (aka nod an agumend :-DDD)

>>13230203
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=432g97vs6s0

>>13230214
Yeah see I just don't think Zizek could ever propose a realistic way to actually leave capitalism, he doesn't have the cybernetics background Land has. In a sense in this video he concedes he agrees with r/acc over l/acc, which disqualifies acc as a political option for him as a leftist, but has no rebuttal to the claims of inevitability, impossible to stop positive feedback loops. Land is such a good when I hear him that I really think he'd control the conversation if they ever talked, Zizek has no answer to this issue that I know of

>>13227202
WELL YOU SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE