/lit/ - Literature

STEM major types (ie. a large 4chan demographic) that are allergic to the word "literature" would be my guess

>>13121299
>Why do people think this is a brainlet board?
The only people who think that are the midwits who don't realize that the "brainlet" posts are actually people much smarter than them being ironic.

>>13121299
it's just run of the mill zoomer tier self referential irony. it's indisputable that this is the smartest board bar none so naturally we have to downplay it for the sake of maintaining cynical, contrarian values

poo poo pee pee

Autistic STEMfags circlejerking about muh IQ and muh math yet failing to comprehend complex social phenomena that is often discussed here.

>>13121299
>well thought, perfectly worded
Yeah right, stop coping. This board is autism central, just like all of 4chan.

>>13121349
>147 iq
>average /lit/ user
Doubt it.

>>13121354
>*proceeds to word his post perfectly*
>proves me right
Brainlet, is that you?

>>13121354
autism is the next evolutionary stage of humankind. cope harder, neurotype. its a proven FACT that autists have higher IQs.

>>13121360
It's a joke.

>>13121360
That is the average, not the median, you pleb. Some of us have an IQ >9000 and pull the rest of you up with us.

>>13121299
lately this board has become /mu/ but for books

>>13121332
I'm in STEM, and while there is a smugness people around me have about science over art, A lot of people like myself also see the value in literature and art, and how disregarding such things would be detrimental.

>>13121349
what does it mean that i only browse /x/ and /lit/ lol

>>13121377
Dubs confirm some of us have 4 digit IQs.

Because behind the eloquence most of this board is a bunch of young retarded literal newfags from reddit who spend 80% of their posts whining about being on 4chan, who either just believe stupid things or advocate them to "be le devils advocate xD" for the sake of it. Its tough to put exactly into words, but basically /lit/ is a bunch of childish pussies.

>>13121360
It's unironically a fake.

>>13121299
I've been here for about 2 weeks and I've already learned to avoid arguments here. Pseudointellectuals is the word I'd use to describe a majority of the board. Most of the people here get their opinions from philosophers that lived hundreds of years ago.

>>13121393
I've asked /lit/ to recommend me books on several unorthodox topics ranging from ethology to heuristics and they always came up with really helpful answers. I unironically appreciate this board.

>>13121428
>Most of the people here get their opinions from philosophers that lived hundreds of years ago
Yes, but that doesn't make them invalid. There is a reason why you're supposed to start with the Greeks.

>>13121436
same.

>>13121299
because people don't have a name/reputation, they must establish social clout in other ways. On /tv/ they demonstrate superiority through heavy irony and memeing. On /v/, the indicator of superiority is disdain for normalfag games and enjoying things in general. On /lit/ the indicator is prose, and generally sounding academic. While the occasional well-worded post on /tv/ will get some appreciative (you)s, only on /lit/ does that effort actually translate into respect and an increased chance of people actually interacting with your post. I think this is also tied to why /lit/ is more tolerant of namefags than other boards, but I'm not totally sure yet. I do know that this makes /lit/ one of the more reddit boards, although more like a small reddit than /v/, which is like a large shitposting reddit

>>13121441
Opinions on today's society that they never experienced.

>>13121456
While the relevancy of old philosophers may fall out of style, that doesn't make them worthless. A part of philosophy and art is to recognize the human condition, which does change over time, yet some aspects of it remain eternal.

>>13121299
Nobody reads so the culture is lost on them.

>>13121473
To be honest, I'd care more if they quoted anthropologists.

>>13121299
ALL the "it's ironic", "lit doesnt read" etc.. posts are written by illiterate swine, braindead zoomers and general retards

>>13121485
My advice to you is to read the Greeks if you already haven't, and other older philosophers. Philosophy can be thought of as a progression of ideas and dialectic debate, which seeks truth. As a result, basically every philosopher who has ever existed has based their work on their predecessor's, the entire chain of which comes from the ideas from the Greeks. All modern philosophy is partially based on their ideas, therefore it's valid.

>>13121428
>Most of the people here get their opinions from philosophers that lived hundreds of years ago.
Do you realise that this sentence make you worse than a speud but an ignorant and stupid man?
>People are dead therefor what they said can't apply to our modern society
Please educate yourself just read a book.

>>13121485
>anthropologists.
nothing could be a worse idea than this, anthropologists have basically thrown a century long tantrum about refusing to admit Darwin into their discipline while clinging to all sorts of ludicrous unexamined and unsupported suppositions

>>13121512
Philosophy isn't a science, right? It's mostly opinions of people, really intelligent people I'll give you that, yet still just opinions. I've seen people write "Well, Neitzsche was a misogynist, therefore misogyny is right."

>>13121521
I've read books, I just don't like philosophy. I've read philosophy and it's a bore.

>>13121539
You're forgetting that the opinions espoused by philosophers need to be based in logic or reason. Anyone writing that about Nietzsche does not have any logic in their reasoning (see logos vs ethos). It's not science in the sense you can test a hypothesis with an experiment, but it employs a similar system of deduction.

>>13121547
I'll get crucified here for saying this, but 90% of the time you can just read a wikipedia page and understand the concepts of an entire philosophy book well enough to retain value from the ideas

>>13121559
>>13121539
Also, logos and ethos came from the Greeks. An example of an idea that's still relevant.

>>13121571
Yeah, but in the age of modern technology, I can just google "logos" and get a series of condensed explanations of the same concept

Obviously it's not the same and you don't get nearly the depth of argument you would from reading the original text, but it sure as hell is more efficient as a method of getting myself up to speed on existing philosophies.

>>13121447
>sounding academic
/lit/ doesn't sound even remotely academic

>>13121299
It's not brainlet, especially when compared to its equivalents for other arts, but it's still pretty shitty and limited. Christposters are the only larger demographic here that usually knows their shit (though their recent stuff like the Pascal pasta is quite low-effort too).

>>13121587
Correct, no one has the time too read everything by everyone and the internet helps fill in said gaps. But certain seminal works should till be read, like The Republic for example, and then you can use google to build up the ideas of Plato and Socrates.

>>13121702
That "too" is a typo so don't grill me.

if its not a brainlet board why do people respond to tripfags?

>>13121436
>>13121441
Yeah sure but good taste in books or even knowlege and eloquence don't equate to being wise or even smart. As a for instance everyone on this board is convinced at least a handful of some or another ivy league multi-millionaires is a fucking retard. To phrase it in other terms /lit/ is the literature board so of course they can express themselves well and give good book recommendations. That doesn't preclude them from as a community being new, gay, and naive.

>>13121332
STEM + Literature hobby is patrician tier

>>13121869
There is a large portion of the population who are dumb and don't know how to read. I don't mean that they are illiterate, I just mean they don't understand plots, themes, and ideas in literature unless someone tells them outright. They don't have the intuition or critical thinking necessary to analyze books themselves, meanwhile many /lit/ users can recommend esoteric books that seemingly don't have much to do with a specific subject because they can extrapolate and apply said books to many topics.

>>13121368
Autism is often comorbid with lower than average IQ.
The fact of the matter is that only high IQ autists can typically perform normally in social situations and those are the only ones you'll interact with in your day to day life.
The average autist is a non-verbal retard.

>>13121447
But all /v/ talks about is normalfag flavor of the month games or shit they played as kids.

>>13121368
The majority of autists have below average IQ, and your "fact" is plain incorrect. Autism is being selected against and reduces the probability of reproduction.

You're already in autism central, so there's no need to feel insecure about not being NT here.

>>13121332
If you really want to kill the STEMLord you simply need to have a discussion on the philosophy of science.Shit fries their brains, they can't handle the idea of not being 'objective' and it's amazing. Had someone tell me Newton's law of gravity was a correct explanation of gravity the other day as long as you keep the scale small enough, shit was wild.

>>13121349
>iq
Fuck pseudo science

>>13121910
>social IQ maymay

lol holy shit fuck off with your kike science

>>13121952
wrong. cope harder brainlet normoid
>natural selection maymay in 2019
yikes

>>13121349
Doubt, biz is the smartest board. They're actually becoming millionaires by marketing digital bits with memes on an anime forum.

>>13122194
>accumulating wealth
>smartest board

>>13122168
« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » are you a boy or a girl?
« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » « Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » « Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » You're such a sassy little thing too!

« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ »

>>13121349
>>13122194
The smartest board is going to be some very small board with a relatively intellectual focus.

biz and lit are way too big to be in the running

>>13122196
They are doing something, accomplishing it, and impacting our world in an unimaginable way. Can lit say the same? Have you stupid fucks published a book that changed the world yet? I don't think so.

/lit/ is pretty midwit, to be honest. It's just that the real internet scum doesn't seem to lurk here that much, using /pol/, /b/, /tv/ and /v/ a lot more.

>>13122211
How is marketing digital bits not a niche intellectual pursuit?

disgusting

>>13122215
They aren't accomplishing anything meaningful. You really think some dude who made a million dollars investing in meme coins is impacting our world? They are all slaves to techno-capital, and arguably they are making the world worse.

>>13122194
>biz
>becoming millionaires

>>13122237
So, you're saying that they're changing the world. Just not in the way you want. Cuck.
>>13122240
True. Only about 10% of biz are millionaires.

>>13122252
>Only about 10% of biz are millionaires
Only about 10% of biz has a 5 figure portfolio.

>>13122230
It is and I imagine they're one of the smarter boards, as is lit, but they're both too large. Many posters on both boards are there for the memes. biz has 11k posts a day, lit has like 6k, they're both mid tier boards, way too fast to actually be consistently high quality. They're both still miles above somewhere like x, which is in the same ballpark with 5k posts a day

>>13122252
Explain how making a million dollars through day trading changes the world. It changes the world about as much as me buying a new pair of socks.

>money bad

>>13122275
They're trying to unsurp pax americana's instrument: us dollars.

Like it or not, biz is actually influencing geopolitics right now by giving Chinese elites a safe haven to store their wealth during the competitive yuan devaluation.

Trade war, Iran, bitcoins, and /biz/ are all connected.

>>13121383
nice to know robot man

>>13122267
Fair enough, I think that biz have impacted the world the most. Which board do you think is smartest?

>>13122304
First, /biz/ is mostly broke af larpers. Second, even if that weren't the case, it's not like anyone in /biz/ is consciously trying to affect the world in their desired way. They are just a collective, and any individual who is a part of that collective is essentially worthless as a result. For example, if I support some dictator who changes the world, did I really change the world as well? I would doubt it because I'd just be a sheep follower. So I guess you can argue that /biz/ as a collective has more impact on the world than /lit/, but again, is influencing global markets in unpredictable ways really changing the world in a meaningful way? It just encourages more of the same accelerationist shit that has already been going on for years.

>>13122345
Firstly, it's not unpredictable. Bitcoin is clearly anti-globohomo neoliberalism currency. Just by participating in the trade, you're weakening IMF's control over global trade. The effects have been predictable: Iran and North Korea are using it to bypass Swift network as expected. China and Russia are stockpiling it for geopolitical purposes.

Ethereum is the Marxist coin. You can use smart contracts to replace the capitalists and give workers the full means of production.

It's not accelerationist shit because this is the endgame and we're already here.

>>13121299
I'd say around 3% of the population (everyone 130 IQ and above) has thoughts that are too complex for journalists. It's not a controversial statement. But they would be upset about it, wouldn't they

>>13122385
I'm not trying to argue about the benefits of cryptocurrency. My point is that almost no one is investing in bitcoin for those reasons though. They invest in it because they want to make money, and they see a large group of people around them doing the same. It's a movement without a leader, and because of that unintended consequences are almost an inevitable outcome, and everyone will lose control of the situation.

>>13122385
>>13122415
You don't see how easily something like crypto can be subverted by certain powers? If someone really wanted to change the world they would actively try to create a system that prevents this, not just invest in crypto itself.

>>13122424
Crypto is decentralized. It cannot be subverted.

>>13122429
True, but just because something is decentralized doesn't mean it can't become tyrannical. Techno-capital is largely decentralized and is also oppressive.

>>13122415
The thing is, when bitcoin is worth so much then, everyone will want to use it. You think that it's unintended consequence but it is intended!

>>13121955
they were right though

>>13122443
No one uses bitcoin though. They just invest and hold onto it.

>>13122429
Technology tends towards centralization, not the other way around. You need society to become more centralized as ever more complex technology becomes necessary.

>>13122440
We need a tool to communicate with each others to get things done. Us dollars are manipulated by the whims of politicians and corporations to deliberately enslave wage slaves.

Bitcoin is the first step towards freedom. Ethereum will enable the post-scarcity world.

>>13122450
Daily 500k transactions say that you're wrong.

>>13122459
Why is that the case? Crypto is a step towards breaking away that idea. All of you brainlets have no arguments against the biz marketing and validating my case that biz really is the smartest board.

>>13121383
Ur favorite vidya and anime? Modern art rules yeehaw

>>13122462
>>13122483
Cryptocurrencies are a currency for the information age. It is a currency built from the internet, and as the internet becomes ever-present and increasingly important, whoever is in charge of the internet will have all the power. Having the internet everywhere and constantly present requires immense amounts of centralization to manage it all, whether that be though Google or the Chinese government. So in many ways there may be less centralization with regards to currency, but much more centralization will be necessary to keep the system of society, which keeps getting more complex, running smoothly.

>>13122485
Believe it or not, I'm a STEM-fag who posts on 4chan and doesn't watch anime or play video games. Reading is my main hobby.

>>13122511
Me too but yea it's pretty uncommon.

>>13122506
The winners using CryptoCurrency will be using decentralized technology. 3d printers for semiconductors. Wi-Fi to connect each others with an arbitrary protocol. Electricity from solar, hydrogen, or whatever.

The centralized powers will be French Revolution'd and hunted down for their loots of bitcoins.

>>13122572
One can hope that's the case, I certainly do, but I also think it's too idealistic to assume that's how everything will play out. Are you ancap like most crypto-fiends?

>>13122607
No, I'm a Marxist. Bitcoin is merely a step towards Ethereumism.

I don't think that it's idealistic. It's happening right now: observe exchanges getting hacked and so on.

>>13122448
weak bait anon, newton's theory of gravity is not a valid explanation of gravity no matter how much you want it to be.

>>13122643
it successfully predicts all sorts of stuff about how gravity behaves though. It's just not perfect

>>13122655
>predicting a phenomenom is the same as explaining the mechanics behind how something works.
Are you retarded?

>>13122693
>it's possible to give a complete explaination

>>13122693
You can make up tons of models of how something works within a certain limit, but that still doesn't give you an explanation on WHY it works the way it does. That's why the fact that special relativity cannot predict certain events on massive or extremely small scales is such a fucking problem.

>>13122693
It is 'right' instrumentally for a given number of circumstances, which is basically all science ever does.

>>13121299

>>13122709
>I refuse to adress the fact that I'm a retard and will instead divert to a whole other statement which may or may not be correct in the hope this will distract you.
Retard confirmed.

>>13122715
Still not adressing the problem here, which is that a model which does not take care for all circumstances cannot be called a general rule by definition. And because of that fact it does not give a satisfactory EXPLANATION of WHY something happens.

All STEMfags should be shot, these are my last words on this topic.

>>13122717
It's not possible for me to fully describe how dumb you are. Satisfied?

>>13122721
Ok but the guy said that Newton was just 'wrong' which is really selling short how much of the world he made intelligible.

Chantards are brainlets

>>13122730
Mate, you can say that someone made great contributions to the field of physics while also acknowledging that Einstein basically made his theory of gravity obsolete for anything that's not related to a small scale model of reality.
Einstein basically proved that Newtonian phsics lead to a whole host of problems it could not deal with which special relativity could. This made Newton literally wrong, but at the same time does not discredit the contributions he made to physics.
Why are you so defensive of a guy who's been dead for centuries?

>>13122774
>>13122730
What I'm trying to say is that you're too PC.

>>13122774
People were sent to the moon using Newton's physics not Einstein's, he did not make Newton obsolete

>>13122774
>>13122780
Newton helped calculate the gravitational constant, which is still relevant today.

>>13122790
Newton was a wizard and gravity is still not understood

>>13122786
we also made gunpowder from alchemy, a huge contribution to our military, yet the latter is now obsolete

>>13121368
you act nothing like the original butterbitch

>>13122126
>I recognize more patterns faster thus me smart!

>>13122716
back seat jannies are sadder than the real ones. get a life, incel

>>13122790
>>13122786
Literally not the point of my comment or relevant to the field of theoretical physics.
>inb4 theoretical physics no real physics.

>>13121349
Use your fucking tripcode so that I can filter you on clover

>>13122194
The only good thread on /biz/ is "stock market general". Otherwise it's mostly shitcoin shills.

First order of business on /biz/ every morning is pink wojack posting when markets slide... a great way to vent

>>13122631
As a Marxist do you support large social programs? Wouldn't you need to consolidate power in the hands of a few in order to achieve such a program?

>>13122993
Dumb take. Bitcoin is the best performing asset in last 10 years. Smg is the cucked safe space for bizitizens to keep tabs on the globohomo neoliberal markets.
>>13123119
Read Marx moron.

>>13123172
Read history faggot. If you support Etherum under the pretense that it decentralizes society, yet at the same time recognize that technology tends to centralize and consolidate power, then how will power ever be decentralized?

>>13123199
Centeralization only occurs by technocratic capitalists appropriating the means of production from the tech workers.

Ethereum smart contracts solve this problem.

>>13123309
Correct me if I am wrong, but a smart contract is basically a contract that can never be broken as it is in the code itself, correct? I don't see how such a thing prevents companies from exploiting workers as they do now. Companies exploit people through the system itself, debt slavery is only a small part of it. In order to develop something like quantum computing for example, we need to incorporate various aspects of society together. Universities have to work with private companies and governments, banks etc. In our case the private corporation acts as the main source of leadership in this, and therefore has power over how the technology develops and influences society, which they will surely manipulate to serve their own interests and secure more power. They will decide what jobs are needed or not. How does Ethereum contracts prevent such a thing? The main reason Marxism fails is that securing the means of production (aka decentralizing power amongst the people) isn't possible so long as technology isn't controlled by the people as well. How would Ethereum contracts allow technology itself to be controlled by the people? Otherwise Marxism will inevitably devolve into large social programs granted by a central power, which is what I was getting at earlier.

>>13123363
The code is the system itself. There is no need for capitalists and managerial class when the contracts can handle the logistics of management and client requests.

My vision is a guild system on ethereum. There would be guild contract for a specific field. Then, the clients would submit the request on a transparent blockchain and the guild members would be able to choose to take or not take the job. The contract wouldn't take any cut. It just does its organizing as the code. The requests are transparent so that the capitalists can't create false consciousness and divide and conquer the workers.

The guilds would handle the education as well and replacing the modern university and degree system with Erc-721 token.

>>13121349
i made this picture
it was a joke lol

>>13123407
That's an interesting idea, but where does that leave something like quantum computing? There can't be a guild for fundamental research in such a field, or does such large scale research never happen in such a system? A guild can do their own small scale research still, but it probably wouldn't be enough. In many ways if such a system can't develop quantum computing they may be considered a good thing.

>>13121539
Philosophy is not a science. Philosophy is the precondition of science.

>>13123482
Why do you think that there can't be a quantum computing guild? If a guild needs skills from different field, then they can submit a request to relevant guilds to get it done.

I'm also curious why you consider not developing quantum computing a good thing.

>>13123529
It isn't that quantum computing is a bad thing in and of itself, its that companies like Google and governments like China can become even more oppressive than they actually are, and I'm just fearful of that fact. China in particular can become exceptionally powerful with this technology, as they will be much more quick to use it on their own people. Regardless, I don't see a quantum computing guild becoming a thing because it is in the fundamental research phase. Like some doctors who might be interested in using quantum computing and machine learning to diagnose patients would not get enough out of it to warrant such a large investment from their guild. You would have to bring together multiple guilds to create a consortium in order to raise the funds, but then you would just be centralizing power again.

>>13123529
>>13123567
Sort of gets into my idea that technology invariably consolidates power because it requires multiple groups to work together under one banner.

>>13123567
There is a spectrum of centrality. Few temporarily guilds conducting fundamental research under a consortium is not oppressive centralized power lol.

>>13123602
It starts out like that, sure. But as the quantum computing guild is funded by multiple smaller guilds, all the guilds funding will eventual begin to rely on the quantum computer guild's technology in order to operate. This grants that guild power over all the smaller guilds that rely on it. It begins to consolidate power, and as new technologies are developed it will consolidate more in a similar fashion.

>>13123602
>>13123612
Imagine that same doctor's guild begins to use quantum computing to conduct all diagnoses and treatments, meaning only a handful of doctors are needed. At that point the quantum computing guild effectively becomes the doctor's guild and becomes more powerful.

>>13123612
>>13123624
Firstly, quantum computation is only better than classical computation for a specific set of problems.

However, I do take your point. Some guilds will be bigger than other guilds and be more powerful. This power will create an imbalance and so on.

I need to dwell on this more unfortunately.

>>13123407
this is interesting, i might borrow it for a scifi setting
thanks anon!

>>13123658
I've actually been thinking about neo-feudalism lately, and the concept of guilds you lay out is certainly relatable, albeit from a Marxist standpoint. I don't even know where to begin when it comes to designing and figuring out a neo-feudalism system, so I need to dwell as well. Feudalism, despite its oppressive nature and despite contrary belief, actually decentralizes power extremely well.

>>13123681
No problem, someone will eventually perfect Marxism... It just needs the right amount of accessible tech to work.
>>13123684
Interesting, I've been looking at this from Marxist perspective. Do you have any preferred neofedualists and books?

>>13123735
I would first say that the neo-feudalism I'm talking about is different from what others describe. I've heard peak capitalist societies described as "feudal", which I understand why they are calling it that, but I'm talking about neo-feudalism as a complete reimagining of society, the economy, and the government. As for preferred people who talk about such things, I don't have much. There are some people in the dark enlightenment or NRx who advocate monarchies or corporate feudalism, but they don't adequately address my own concerns and goals with such a system, and tend to be much more authoritative than they should be. That's why I'm literally starting with the Greeks and working my way through time to help develop my own unique system, which will admittedly probably get nowhere, but I'd rather support my own esoteric system than some else's.

>>13123735
>>13123769
I'm currently thinking that a sort of neo-theocracy has to be developed out of nihilism, but I don't even know where to begin in analyzing this idea. Imagine a priest class that ruled society, but said priest class had holy commandments that prevented them from having too much power. They would live in relative isolation with little to no processions. They would have no lovers or money. They solely exist for the benefit of other people and society. This is of course a pipe-dream, but I plan to build it more thoroughly.

>>13121349
>/k/ is rated decently
Alright I guess.

>>13123435
Sci being less iq than lit was the giveaway. Also you gotta update it for /his/ and /qa/

>>13121299
because the other 50% are /po/tards trying to sound like intellectuals and it's honestly embarrassing

>>13121299
Midwits are just obnoxious brainlets. Embrace total pseudery.

>>13125598
I meant /pol/tards, I have nothing against origami people

>>13125598
>and it's honestly embarrassing
reddit prose

>>13121299
>Why do people think this is a brainlet board?

Most threads are trash, and /lit/ has more dumb reddit leftists than any other board.

>>13125614
>/lit/ has more dumb reddit leftists than any other board.
They appear to migrate back to leftypol and whatever reddit boards they browse like geese or something periodically though. /lit/ isn't usually as bad as it was back in like 2014ish. Probably just bump now thanks to the zizek debate. I still prefer them to the general sissyfag tone you get from redditors on underage boards like /v/.

>>13121561
repulsive

>>13121299

The bare reality is that you are all nothing more than a bunch of pseudo-intellectual bluepilled cucklords.

There are some smart people on this board, but they're not the ones making threads.
"OP is a faggot" isn't a meme, the opening post of a thread is usually the least intelligent or interesting. From my experience 4chan users who lurk threads tend to be better posters than those who make them.
If your only experience of /lit/ is scrolling through the front page, of course you're going to think everyone here is retarded.

>>13121561
Wiki isn't accurate, if you weren't a newfag you would know the editors are all lolcows. try looking at talk pages now and then.

>>13125683
it's easier to get replies with a stupid op than a non-stupid one
if you write something dumb people think they're schooling you, if you ask normally they think it's spoonfeeding

>>13122211
/lit/ is one of the smallest boards on the site, just slightly outranking /his/

If you want actual small boards then I guess cute/anime, photography and papercraft and origami.

>>13121299
When you stay on this board you think everyone is a brainlet, but then you go to other boards where people can't even form full sentences.

>>13121299
/lit/ stopped being good circa 2014

>>13126011
This. /lit/ may be pseud central, but i'll take pseuds who can at least pretend to have some taste over the anti-intellectual brainlets on the other media boards.

>>13122304
>Trade war, Iran, bitcoins, and /biz/ are all connected.

go on

>>13125713
>just slightly outranking /his/

his is fucking stupid, kara booga threads, wut if hitler won ww2, and bruh look at this dude (insert country here)

>>13126321
>/lit/ can't read

>>13126345
/his/? more shit