/lit/ - Literature

>>13022748
no
no
big no

>>13022748
No

>>13022748
Yes, yes and not usually but I'm sure I've glanced at some. Only incels say no.

>>13022748
No
No
Fuck no

>>13022837
>only incels say no
Ok genius, you savant you, you upper echelon intellectual you, you brilliant mind you

>>13022837

>>13022748
Yes, yes, generally no

>>13022748
yea buddy
yea sometimes
yep definitely

try the bell jar by sylvia plath

>>13022748
no
no
no

yes to all three :) i love it when someone recommends me a book. i get to examine what draws them to the book while enjoying a new experience :) discussing ideas is a big plus too :) i love you :)

>>13023103
you talk like a faggot

>>13022748
Yes
Yes
People don't usually recommend books to me

>>13023103
I can't help but think that your posts play a role in some kind of social experiment

>>13022748
yes
yes
I almost never read other people's book recommendations

>>13022748

No
No(except one, and it was a novella [Carmilla])
No

Not on purpose, I actually hadn't thought about it until you mentioned it to me.
Can't say I can even think of many (good) books that I've heard of that are by/lead by women.

Closest I've gotten to that is an idea I worked on for a while before throwing out in which the protagonist's gender was never specified, and that's just because I didn't want it to be judged based on that.

what even is this board anymore. There are about three people left who are actually well read provide worth while discussion of literature and then there are /pol/ shits who read Dante in high school and now declare themselves experienced in ‘western culture’ and come here to circle jerk it’s demise. What does this thread contribute? A area to endless bicker about feminism with bigots who’ve already decided there not going to change there mind and are in fact proud of there ignorance?
A place to recommend female authors that will promptly be ignored and dismissed as art hoe shit by people who’ve never read them? A series of yes’s and no’s that day abousoutly nothing becuse this discussion belongs one hundred years in the past? Oh I know, it’s a (you) generator. Op’s trying to generate (you)’s by appearing neutral while clearing trying to attract misogynist, sexist get (you)’a by trying to be as vile and hateful as possible to both earn praise from fellow sexist and derision from those who aren’t, and those who answer the non insane thing are even considered baiting for not conforming to obvious reality that this board has the mindset of an 17th century Puritan and what are we if not perpetually outraged that no one fetishizes the past as much as us. Goodnight

>>13024029
based as fuck

>>13024029
that's going in my cringe compilation

>>13022748
yes
yes
yes
...but rarely have I ever not regretted it

>>13023103
you got a chuckle out of me--well played.

>>13022748
>do you read books written by women?
I don't know how to read books by women. Seriously, I am completely illiterate when trying to read books by women. I can read books written by men just fine, but whenever I try to read one by a woman, it's like I have forgotten how to read, and it's all a bunch weird symbols on a page and can't make any of it out! Am I the only one who experiences this? Can somebody please, help me?

>>13024072
Stop buying Cyrillic books when you can't speak Russian.