/lit/ - Literature

>Prodigy born once in a 1000 years

>>13016024
not an argument

You seem to be under the impression that I'm going to spend 4 hours watching some bald retard talk to the camera. What a silly thing to assume.

>Ayn Rand
0/10

>>13016015
>four (4) hours of some retarded powerpoint presentation by some midwit
what do people who watch this crap look like?

>>13016041
I probably shouldn't be replying to a tripfag, but what's your problem with her?

>>13016058
butterfly hates anyone who isn't pro tranny
:3
I'll never forgive that tranny bitch for cucking me

>>13016049
Like this.

pic is me while watching Molyneux btfo Plato

>>13016058
Bastardized Stirner-ian, incompetent as a philosopher and an awful writer. Overhyped by pea-brain right-liberals. It was once against the rules to post Rand on /lit/. It should be so again.

>>13016095
lmao whatever you say tranny

"capitalist woman bad"
ok thanks great argument

Not watching the video because of molymeme, but the West definitely needs to rediscover Aristotle, and other neglected aspects of Greek culture like the playwrights and historians. All I ever hear about are Plato and the Stoics, both of whom have something very "Eastern" about them.

>>13016100
Cuck

>>13016111
If you feel so cucksure of yourself then watch from the 4th hour mark. Don't cope out.

>>13016015
Why would you watch a propagandist when you could watch Greg Sadler, the Minotaur of Milawaukee?

>>13016015
> Canadian
Every time.

>>13016015
As Guenon said the modern mind sees irriducibile conflict between Plato and Aristotle where once it was understood to be complementarity between the two views.

>>13016049
im basically arnold just taller and i enjoy molymemes content frequently

>>13016015
So this is where the Molymeme shills went after leaving /pol/

>>13016869
Imagine having access to thousands upon thousands of genuinely thoughtful and incisive books but spending your time watching hour long videos made by some autistic Canadian who rants about IQ and muh libertarianism.

>>13016111
secular heathens fear the Aristotelians

>>13016015
Well, at least anons now have an accurate take on how the right views Plato. And don't you forget it!

>>13016015
>20 seconds in
>"The fundamental difference between Plato and Aristotle is collectivism and individualism"

And that's enough of that

>>13016015
>4 hours

>>13016111
>Not watching the video because of molymeme
Getting your understanding of such an important topic from a known shameless hack (and lending him support to continue his fraud) is somehow the only recourse here? How about reading some Aristotle?

>>13016095
When the fuck was it ever against the rules to post Rand on /lit/? Also reminding everyone of how you were ragging on Spengler last week and then revealed a few posts after that you had never read him. I hope the voices tell you to kill yourself and you do it.

>>13017238
It's obvious he's presenting his statement and then arguing for it. If you actually bothered watching you wouldn't have such a brainlet take on it.

If your ADHD is that bad just watch from the 4th hour mark where he speaks directly to the camera.

>>13016149
You cucked yourself outside of manhood. Enjoy being a balding "lady"

>>13017262
>present obviously retarded statement
>NO NO NO WAIT LISTEN TO MY FOUR HOURS OF PILPUL OR YOU CANT JUDGE
nah

Nobody who matters care about philosophy on this day and age

>>13017480

Donald Trump has a small dick, you know.

>>13016167
this, this and this
Sadler understands and respects philosophy, Stefan is an unintelligent fraud

>>13016049
Watched it today
I'm a mix between Goose and Ovechkin (w teeth)

>>13016015
>plato vs aristotle
>collectivism vs individualism
epic

>>13016015
>Citing a Native American genocide denialist

>>13016015
>4 hours
Lets get a summary

>>13017609
Ok?

>>13017609
Based

>>13017609
Empirically false. I know you want the dick pics though Schiff

>>13017505
>PILPUL
TIL this word

>>13016042

>>13017259
>I hope the voices tell you to kill yourself and you do it.
What an awful thing to say

>>13016095
Stirner died broke and alone. He was not liked or well recieved. His thought is a benchmark, a certain articulation, coherent it’s true, but never the less embarrassing. People use him as the perfect embodiment to stand for as an idea that they are in argument with/ mainly against. He is, by all means, a petty egoist. Nobody who truly believed what Stirner wrote would ever come to write it. He was the my chemical romance of egoists. It’s time you upped ur reading list, it’s kind of embarrassing to refer to him.

Ayn Rand is not even worth mentioning let alone arguing against

>>13016015
>Molyneux
Molyneux was a panelist at a 2014 Detroit conference held by the men's rights movement and manosphere organization, A Voice for Men. According to Jessica Roy of Time magazine, Molyneux argued that violence in the world is the result of how women treat their children, and that "If we could just get people to be nice to their babies for five years straight, that would be it for war, drug abuse, addiction, promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, ... Almost all would be completely eliminated, because they all arise from dysfunctional early childhood experiences, which are all run by women.

>>13019151
b&r

>>13016015
>4 hours long
How the fuck does anyone have time to listen to this droning retard? I don't respect anyone who doesn't have the discipline to cut 4 hours of nonsense down to at most a collection of 1 hour lectures.