[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 423 KB, 900x1001, deleuze3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13002701 No.13002701 [Reply] [Original]

Just finished Anti-Oedipus the other day, starting 1000 Plateaus right now and I'm wondering if this guy got the memo about Kant. Where does he take his whole ontology from? At no point does he back up any of the bold claims he keeps making. Am I missing something?

>> No.13002744

>>13002701
>and I'm wondering if this guy got the memo about Kant.

his entire career is a response to Kant you fucking brainlet

>> No.13002754

>>13002701
write a quick summary of anti-oedipus

>> No.13002765

>>13002754

He parses myriad ethical quandaries.

>> No.13002783

>>13002765
fair enough

>> No.13002809
File: 196 KB, 1000x1500, h-3000-deleuze_gilles_gilles-deleuze-portrait_1988_edition-originale_autographe_1_53968.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13002809

>>13002744
How so? According to SEP he works in a post-Kantian framework in D&R. Now I haven't read D&R, but in C&S he seems to have reverted to some kind of Spinozan panpsychic materialism and I can't figure out how that's compatible with Kant's central problematic.

>> No.13002812

>>13002809
Read his lecture series on Kant, available online. His entire system derives from transcendental empiricism, his inversion of Kant's schematic

>> No.13002881

Deleuze's virtual is a transcendental category empty of forms but still containing difference (probably partially derived from Leibniz, probably even Trinitarian theology in how an unindividuated virtual can still be characterised by multiplicity, and if Deleuze is to have his way Bergson), a elegant 'organic' solution to not falling into the trap he sees with Kant for one. Key to this solution is that individuation is a process which occurs after something has emerged into our everyday empirical realm, probably cribbed from Simondon and a redirect from the waning fashionability of Existentialism's essence-existence etc.

Deleuze is one of the top "I've already considered that and here's my workaround" philosophers of all time. A huge part of his philosophy just comes about trying to avoid falling into so many pitfalls which others before him have. I think that more than anything is why his language is so ephemeral, he doesn't want to say too much but has to account for a lot.

>> No.13002885

You know he wrote an entire book on Kant, right?

I hate this fucking board.