[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 36 KB, 502x377, 1555718105247.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964775 No.12964775 [Reply] [Original]

Zizek vs Peterson debate
continued

>> No.12964788

not gay btw

>> No.12964789
File: 145 KB, 500x621, wyp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964789

>> No.12964790

Peterson should've read Zizek. How can one man be so disingenuous in everything he says and does?

>> No.12964791

Peterson is the beta bipolar

Zizek is the chad schizo

It's over

>> No.12964798

>>12964775
this shit is like a satire

fucking Kermit the esoteric boomer and the rambling crypto fascist Slav commie

>> No.12964819

PETERSON BTFO

CHAD ZIZEK KEKING THE SHIT OUT OF THIS FUCKING SMOOTH BRAINED KIKE RETARD AHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.12964821

does this mean that joe cuck rogan will bring zizek on jre

>> No.12964826
File: 14 KB, 250x248, hiata.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964826

guys what if they stop fighting and stop making out?

>> No.12964828

Stop saying "why are they talking about communism/capitalism it's about happiness", no the debate is happiness: Communism and Capitalism, retarded but that's what it is.

>> No.12964834

Why does Peterson always sound like he is about to cry?

>> No.12964839

>>12964821
Would watch

>> No.12964842
File: 7 KB, 250x237, 1538263273525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964842

>judeo-christian

>> No.12964850

zizek is built like the michelin man

>> No.12964864

i wish a socially conservative/economically liberal person would address how their brand of individual morality can be re-enforced/spread, especially when the economic liberalism they support trends people in the opposite direction

>> No.12964873

>starving to death reminds you how happy you were to have food
woah, he's mopping the floor with jbp

>> No.12964878
File: 150 KB, 346x357, 1546226750665.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964878

>>12964842
>traditional values

>> No.12964884

>a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs.

This is what comes up when you google communism. In what world is this practical?

>> No.12964889

>>12964834
cause if he gets called out or rekt on a debate he can just make up some story about being ill for a month because he drank a glass of cider or something

>> No.12964894

zizek is literally going to cede the debate to peterson by default because he isnt even interested in arguing his own point

>> No.12964895

>the true horror for me was that four years later, ex-communists came back to power
BASED

>> No.12964898

>>12964775
>in a debate about capitalism vs marxism in regards to happiness, Zizek starts arguing against happiness itself
worth the wait

>> No.12964908
File: 48 KB, 492x449, 1526726420484.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964908

Well, this isn't getting any better, I expected a debate and instead got recycled lectures.

>> No.12964909

>>12964889
Peterson is clearly some sort of pseudo bipolar case. He's not an actual madman but he's emotionally unstable and gets wrapped up into delusional grandiose thinking

>> No.12964910
File: 29 KB, 447x329, why are the simpsons green.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964910

oh god zizek is fucking murdering jordan

>> No.12964913

I can't believe Peterson is having an actual debate.

>> No.12964918

>capitalism needs dictatorship
>marx didn't have a good theory of how social power exists
I thought this guy was a commie....?

>> No.12964923

There's so much more overlap between these guys than I think they realized, but I think it's hitting them now.

>> No.12964924

>>12964842
who said judeo christian? it better not have been zizek

>> No.12964926

UH
UH
WHERE
UH

>> No.12964927

>peterson: *on the verge of tears*
>zizek: shshshshshshshshsh SNIFFFF uhhh

this is so strangely unpleasant to listen to

>> No.12964930

>>12964898
in the words of zizek,
>the first rule of psychoanalysis is that noone really wants to be happy

>> No.12964935

Why is the commie making "ugh" noises constantly?

>> No.12964937

someone post that peterson face now

>> No.12964943

>>12964924
petersein

>> No.12964944

>for him, comunism is not egalitarianism
Fucking THANK YOU, zizek. I was waitong for someone to tell Peterson communism isn't just when "every1 is equal."

>> No.12964946

>>12964923
no zizek literally said that his approach with this ""debate"" was to focus on where they agree rather than disagree

this is very likely just a cheap excuse but still
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Y9-9AkQV-c

>> No.12964954

>the only thing that happened at the end of apartheid is the old ruling class was joined by a new black ruling class

>> No.12964955

>>12964918
Capitalist nations are considered the "dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie" in Marx's theories.

>> No.12964959

because yeh uh sniff uh egalitaranism sniff uhhh uh a uh SNIFF uh ah SNIFFFFF marx UH sniff

>> No.12964963

>>12964954
the only thing that happened when i banged your mom was that her old pussy was joined by my black cock

>> No.12964965

OKAY, VERY BRIEFLY

>> No.12964967

wtf the crowd im scared for slavoj bros

>> No.12964969

>>12964935
He has nervous ticks

>> No.12964972

>oh god zizek is fucking murdering jordan
how do people believe he makes any good points
>irrelevant story
>*sniff*
>weird analogy
>*sniff*
>im not arguing for marxism, im arguing against happiness
>*sniff*

>> No.12964973

>>12964923
everybody pushed these two together in a staged debate and inadvertently made them friends with each other. that's what we're watching. Peterson and Zizek's blossoming friendship.
they've literally agreed more than disagreed.
they have 10 minutes each for a rebuttal and they're scrambling for disagreements.

>> No.12964976

>>12964821
hopefully

>> No.12964977

>>12964965
this is every time zizek opens his mouth

>> No.12964979

zizek is simply a new world orderist dressed up in leninism lite

>> No.12964985

>>12964965
I SPENT 40 YEARS THINKING ABOUT THIS you

>> No.12964987
File: 33 KB, 500x667, peterson rises.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964987

>>12964937

>> No.12964990

>>12964884
Earth 57

>> No.12964994

>>12964775
https://www.strawpoll.me/17849671

>> No.12964995

>>12964923
>There's so much more overlap between these guys than I think they realized, but I think it's hitting them now.
They both just made the same argument, got confused that they were in agreement and started attacking Scandinavian socialism out of confusion..

>> No.12964996

>>12964910
This is not even wrong. He is going leng tch'e on his ass, giving him morphine while continualy cutting.

>> No.12964997

I love how this turned into a private lecture for Peterson

>> No.12964998
File: 571 KB, 1599x1165, millerna.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12964998

Can we all agree that monarchism is the greatest form of government?

>> No.12965000

>zizek btfoing marx live on stage
that's it, the lobster man won, he's self-destructing

>> No.12965001
File: 36 KB, 128x128, 533404860440117254.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965001

>the obligatory French phrase

Thank you sniffing man

>> No.12965003

>>12964972
Zizek cites a lot of different authors and books and people think he's smart and therefore feel smart if they like him.

>> No.12965004

this crowd is a cringefest, purely in there for the enterteinment

>> No.12965005

In terms of what the debate was supposed to be about: Marxism vs capitalism, as to which creates the most happiness, Zizek hasn't even defended marxism while Peterson has defended capitalism against marxism. Zizek lost the debate.

>> No.12965011

Zizek is describing the EU...

Works well, plebs done understand it, and a multinational organisation.

>> No.12965012

>>12964998
no

>> No.12965015

>>12964775
Peterson is a fucking idiot lmao
Zizek even called him out that Marx explicitly denounces egalitarianism, thank fuck for that.

>> No.12965018

Lobsterman BTFO

>> No.12965019

>>12965000
You're actually retarded friend arent you

>> No.12965020

He went overtime for the second time even after saying he would keep it under ten minutes.
What a fucking alpha.

>> No.12965025

How the fuck is Zizek "murdering" Memerson? They're both approaching the same thing with same arguments from different angles

>> No.12965026

>when I was looking at your work
does this mean memerson actually read some zizek before walking on stage

>> No.12965029
File: 3.47 MB, 499x367, 1554621835881.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965029

why is he hitting on him

>> No.12965030

>hes psychoanalysing zizek because thats all hes formally trained in

eek

>> No.12965031

oh god I need to sell all my petersoncoin before the market crashes

>> No.12965033

>>12965003
he literally mentioned like 5 or 6 writers you retard

do you know what board you are on

>> No.12965035

>>12965004
Yeah, I could do without the constant cheering every other minute.

>> No.12965036

>>12964775
"I will stop, immediately"
Based Zizek

>> No.12965038

>peterson calling zixek smart, funny and attractive
dawww

>> No.12965041

>>12965030
Kek

>> No.12965044

I have a dog in this fight and this is the first time I've listened to Zizek but WTF do people take him serious??
What a rambling mess of nothing. If he had a southern accent he'd be laughed out of the building.
Hes like a perfect distillation of the university class. Sounds impressive and authoritative but isn't actually saying or doing anything.

>> No.12965046
File: 596 KB, 1622x1346, Ideology is Kosher.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965046

>> No.12965049

>>12964923
>but I think it's hitting them now.
It's really hitting them now.

>> No.12965051

>>12964998
Lasted for thousands of years while newcomers are constantly in crisis in the short time they've been popular. There's just no competition.

>> No.12965052

>>12965033
When he could get to the point by mentioning 0.

>> No.12965054

>>12965025
/lit/ has ptsd from years of petersonposting, they froth at the mouth at any opportunity to attack him

>> No.12965055

This is where he kills peterson

>> No.12965056

Zizek made ONE decent point that "Cultural Marxists are just the new "Jews" for reactionaries to rail against" which is one of Peterson's main schticking points, but Peterson didn't respond to it and the whole thing got dropped.

Shame.

>> No.12965065

Zizekism

>> No.12965066

>>12965025
simple: he turned peterson into a fucking commie

>> No.12965071

>>12964775
>last chance for Peterson to ask Zizek literally anything
>YOU'RE SO COOL ZIZEK WHY ARE YOU SO COOL
fucks sake what am i watching

>> No.12965073

>>12965044
Welcome to the last 30 years of Zizekian thought, we have sniffing memes and trashcan jokes

>> No.12965076

>>12965025
this. they both end up saying " we need to change things" with no real solution. They even acknowledge the same problems

>> No.12965077

>>12965054
and you have ptsd from reactionary behavior towards petersonposting ,

>> No.12965078

"if you read him closely"
Translation
"If you actually read him"

>> No.12965079

>>12965054
Peterson caused more butthurt than anything ive ever seen on this site. pol lost their fucking minds over him

and he is literally just this naive boomer fuck

>> No.12965081

HAHAHHAHAHAH HE DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT ZIZEK

>> No.12965083

Imagine being in front of one of the most red contemporary philosophers and ask him why he isn't zizekian

>> No.12965086

zizek subtly calling peterson a brainlet and telling him to read more to his face in front of his fans

>> No.12965088

based zizek reducing jordan to tears

>> No.12965091

>>12965071
4d chess debate mastermind slavoj, penis higiene man GTFO

>> No.12965095

hegel is retarded

>> No.12965097

>rap battle for nerds

>> No.12965101
File: 882 KB, 745x748, 1551119844447.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965101

>marxism-zizekizn

>> No.12965103
File: 19 KB, 303x360, Voltaire2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965103

>read Capital you fucking pseud

>> No.12965104

>zizek literally giving Peterson a 'start with marx' chart

>> No.12965105

>>12965086
I wouldn't say that subtle

>> No.12965108

>>12965083
It wasn't a bad question. Zizek does differ from Marx quite a lot and criticizes him often.

>> No.12965110

What was the point of this?

>> No.12965111
File: 220 KB, 696x773, 8YsZLMh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965111

an excerpt of zizeks most popular book off google search of his name of a random start of a chapter i scrolled down to

t b h it reads like some any anonymous comment on this board but published into a book.

>> No.12965114

Do you think Peterson is going to get SNIFF'D when we goes back to his hotel room after this?

>> No.12965117

best part is how different the discussion on /lit/ is from ultra lefty places who are REALLY upset at Zizek.

>> No.12965123

im late bros, whos winning

>> No.12965124

Peterson seems intellectually spent

>> No.12965125

>>12965117
You mean leftypol and leftpol, right?

>> No.12965126
File: 30 KB, 412x350, 4634563457.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965126

>dropping the Hegel pill

>> No.12965129

>>12965066
If anything they both just drifted into social democracy, one from capitalism and the other from communism

>> No.12965130

>>12965111
lol does he have a ghost writer? No way that bumbling slav could write this on his own.

>> No.12965131
File: 936 KB, 644x644, Screenshot_142.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965131

>mfw peterson has never read marx

>> No.12965133

>>12965110
Zizek and Peterson becoming buttbros while their fans pretend they're debating

>> No.12965135

https://youtu.be/1Q46AoR80M4

>> No.12965136

peterson is not understanding anything at all

>> No.12965137

>>12965123
Z

>> No.12965140

>>12965110
Hegelian dialectic to create Zizekiansim-Petersonism

>> No.12965142

>>12965117
the left have been extremely mad at Zizek for a couple years now ever since he said something about the 85iq goatfucking honor killers maybe not being the same as progressive Europeans

>> No.12965143

HE'S DOING IT
DAMN POSTMODERNEOMARXIST

>> No.12965144

>>12965056
He made important point that capitalism doesnt really need freedom to succeed (China, or Singapore in his other texts)

>> No.12965145

>>12965129
that's gay

>> No.12965148

>>12965123
Look at Peterson, intellectually exhausted by lacan and Hegel analysis from zizek

>> No.12965149

cheap move by zizek lol this is gay

>> No.12965150

>>12965124
It's hard for him to say anything because Zizek isn't the type of postmodern cultural marxist he rants about

>> No.12965153

>who is the marxist here?????!!!

BTFO

>> No.12965154

>WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS

>> No.12965155

FUCKING FINALLY ZIZEK IS THROWING DOWN

>> No.12965158

Lmaooo Zizek dont do it to him

>> No.12965159

zizek is the one who mounts the world

>> No.12965163

>>12965143
RIGHT INTO THE HEART OF JORDAN'S PREVERBAL DRAGON

>> No.12965166

Betason got exposed as a buckold and is now showing his belly like a dog that just got dominated.

It's over, he's over.

>> No.12965169

>>12965163
>>12965155
>>12965158
HERE IT FUCKING GOES BOYS

>> No.12965170

THIS IS A FUCKING SLAUGHTER HOLY SHIT

>> No.12965171

>you are an idiot and you don't know what you're talking about
>read more
based slavoj

>> No.12965173

Jesus, Peterson looks like he wants to cry right now

Le cocaine communist does it again

>> No.12965174

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I HURT MYSELF TODAY

>> No.12965175

LMAO THIS WHOLE BLABBERING FOR 2 HOURS WAS A SETUP FOR THE SUCKER PUNCH

>> No.12965176

All of a sudden there's a debate. What happened?

>> No.12965179

brainlet assumption by zizek to pretend that post modern neomarxism isn't a fruit grown from a branch on the tree of marxism

>> No.12965185

HAHAHAHAHAHA

zizek is doing everything
the funny part is that this is what he said he wouldnt do in that interview.

4d chess

>> No.12965187

DAYUMMMM

>> No.12965188

>>12965154
>>12965153
>VARUS, GIVE ME BACK MY MARXISTS

>> No.12965190

finally zizek is ending this pseud's career

>> No.12965191

lobster cornered hahahaha

>> No.12965194

Kermit is about to cry

>> No.12965195

Peterson is so fucking beta, holy shit. He has less energy than a fuckign 70 yo man

>> No.12965196

Slam Dunk!

>> No.12965197

im watching the debate via twitch where two guys are playing half life death match while watching, wont pay those 15 euros

>> No.12965200

LOL Zizek is owning the debate, holy shit

Peterson is practically stuck at
>hey, erm, aren't you going to defend the marxist/communist caricature now so that I can attack you?

>> No.12965201

holy shit

>> No.12965203
File: 368 KB, 656x900, hghgft.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965203

>Zizek bringing out the Fisherian ideas

>> No.12965205

>>12965135
thank you

>> No.12965206

>>12965175
this on some valentines day massacre shit

>> No.12965207

Goddammit I'm unironically cringing.

>> No.12965208

holy shit, peterson on suicide watch

>> No.12965210

WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS

>> No.12965209

holy fucking shitballs he actually said it

>> No.12965212

>just because they describe themselves as marxists doesn't meant they're REAL marxists

amazing argument

>> No.12965215

>>12965123
Zizek just completely fucking destroyed Peterson.

>> No.12965219

Peterson BTFOOO

>> No.12965221

Oh god that happened right after Peterson was like you're so cool oh my goodness let's be friends

>> No.12965225
File: 135 KB, 819x1024, 1551417736875.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965225

you can't name them because marxism and postmodernism are merely masks that the jew wears as are all other destructive ideologies

juden peterstein is the greatest gatekeeper of the jewish question so he will never be able to answer zizek's question because the only answer is jews

>> No.12965228

>>12965197
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q46AoR80M4

>> No.12965230

fucking lol theyre both getting mad now

>> No.12965232

talking over each other

>> No.12965233

This whole debate was worth it just for this

>> No.12965234

>>12965166
Zizek rope a doped him holy fuck

>> No.12965236

>>12965215
Lol wut. He answered that question easily.

>> No.12965237
File: 7 KB, 205x246, images.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965237

AHHHHHHHHH WHAT IS HAPPENING NOOOOOOO JORDANNN AHHHHHHH PLEASE

>> No.12965241

zizek just straight up insulted peterson to his face lmao

>> No.12965243

I feel kind of bad for Peterson. His question was basically "you are so smart so why not create Zizekism?" and Zizek's question was basically "why are you so stupid?"

>> No.12965245

>name 11 marxists and 6 kinos where this happens
peterson knows he doesn't have to respond to shitposts, right?

>> No.12965247
File: 19 KB, 474x266, aaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965247

>just name one of them

>> No.12965248

>Zizek: who are you quoting?
>Peterson: uhhh

>> No.12965249

bros...I thought peterson would win this
it wasn't supusto be like this

>> No.12965250

>>12965210
>about 25% of profs, here are the stats
>no name dem!
wow really intellectual debate here

>> No.12965251

>calls everyone neo-marxist
>hasn't read marx since he was 18
>only reads the communist manifesto

>> No.12965255

Honestly the only things ruining this debate are the audience/litfags acting like this is a football match rather than a conversation.

>> No.12965257
File: 41 KB, 483x222, explain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965257

Mommy, why did Zizek have to kill the lobsterman?

>> No.12965256

Peterson is getting so humiliated I needed to mute the stream

>> No.12965258

>>12965228
search "muke," for up to date stream

>> No.12965259

OH NO NO NO

>> No.12965263
File: 12 KB, 317x267, bawhaha.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965263

I'm actually cracking up over here, how the hell a geriatric obese pervert managed to convince a Jungian boomer the benefits of Marxism is pure comedy gold

>> No.12965264

>>12965228
holy shit thank you

>> No.12965265

>>12965236
>moral superiority of the proletariat
MARX NEVER SAID THIS. MARX DID NOT BELIEVE IN OBJECTIVE MORALITY.

>> No.12965266

I've never seen Peterson subdued wtf

>> No.12965267

Oh my god zizek is going to pull his punches isnt he?

>> No.12965269

WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS
WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS
WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS
WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS
WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS
WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS

>> No.12965272
File: 74 KB, 916x640, lmao.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965272

>name ONE book that does this

>> No.12965275

what did zizek say?

>> No.12965278

Peterson's 'pomos are smuggling marxism into their supposed rejection of overarching narratives' is 100% true and Im surprised he would even be aware of that because it's reactionary territory

>> No.12965281

>>12965275
WHERE ARE MARXISTS PUNK

>> No.12965282

CRINGE

>> No.12965283

>>12965142
It's so fucking weird, "Zizek is one of us!!!" in-between being upset about Zizek mentioning LGBTQ propaganda.

>> No.12965285

WHERE ARE THEY PETERSON????????? HMMM???????? WHERE ARE THEY????????

>> No.12965286

ARE YOU AWARE

>> No.12965287

>>12965275
he asked jordan about penis higiene

>> No.12965288

I'm not able to watch it right now, what did Zizek do to get this reaction?

>> No.12965289

>>12965258
no need

>> No.12965290

>>12965275
NAME ONE MARXIST THAT IS A PART OF THIS POST MODERNIST NEO MARXIST WHATEVER

>> No.12965291

HOW DO I HIDE THIS THREAD?


AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>> No.12965294

>>12965278
>Peterson's 'pomos are smuggling marxism into their supposed rejection of overarching narratives' is 100% true
[citation needed]

>> No.12965295

>>12965265
Well that’s obviously not true commie piece of shit

>> No.12965300
File: 102 KB, 1024x683, palm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965300

what the fuck

>> No.12965302

>>12965278
This was actually a great point by Peterson and Zizek actually had no response.

>> No.12965304
File: 41 KB, 1280x720, joker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965304

WHERE ARE THEY

>> No.12965305

Jordan's bout to have a seizure

>> No.12965307

Did Peterson just pull a "I bet you're fun at parties"? What a fag

>> No.12965308

>>12965275
honestly he just asked Peterson who exactly he's referring to when he says "postmodern neomarxist" and Peterson said its less an individual so much as an ideology that he's against

everyone's losing their shit because it was literally the only punch thrown in the almost two hour "debate"

>> No.12965309

>>12965288
attacked the whole postmodern neomarxism thing

>> No.12965310

slersh slersh slersh

>> No.12965311

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

>> No.12965312

Is David Harvey worth reading? Zizek just name-dropped him.

>> No.12965313

>>12965290
Eric Clanton, the Bike Lock fugitive

>> No.12965315

Did Peterson just spaz out literally

>> No.12965318

Fuck this shit. I can't watch it live cause got an exam in 30minutes

>> No.12965322

He didnt deal the killing blow that coward

>> No.12965326

I don't understand why everyone is saying this is an epic win when half my profs are into foucault as well as marx, they get smuggled together even when they shouldn't be and that's the problem. Peterson is too ignorant to look into it, Zizek is a vulgar pleb who can't see that and is trying to epicly win on trivial points after grandstanding about muh this is not a contest

>> No.12965328

>>12964775
>"Zizek you're so smart and attractive"
>Zizek immediately calls him an idiot and demands he name the Marxists he's attacking
THE VIRGIN PETERSTEIN FEARS THE CHAD ZIZEK
>>12965111
this requires you to at least have read Derrida, Baudrillard, etc. to understand what is meant by signifier

>> No.12965329

>>12965272
Jete has a computer and Zizek only has notes
wtf

>> No.12965330

>HEEDONISM
this fucking orater fuck off

>> No.12965333

>>12965315
Yes

>> No.12965334

>>12965294
The only academic in the past 50 years who has actually come out and said 'Academia itself has its own set of oppressive power structures that dictate opinions' is Foucault and he got in shit for it. And he didn't even actually say what they were- (race and gender politics primarily, but other stuff recently as well)

>> No.12965335

>ITS NO WONDER YOU DONT GET INVITED TO PLACES

>> No.12965336

I guess now the cracks in Peterson's education are showing. He hasn't engaged with any sort of academic literature, and Zizek is exasperated because he doesn't want to flex (name drop), but still can't understand what Peterson is getting at.

>> No.12965337

>>12965307
yeah, that can be taked as a compliment desu

>> No.12965339

What happened I'm late to the party

>> No.12965340

>>12965322
he's playing with his prey

>> No.12965342
File: 702 KB, 1926x1346, Ideology is Superstition.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965342

>> No.12965343

I saw Zizek at a grocery store in Toronto yesterday. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother him and ask him for photos or anything.

He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now Jordan?”

I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “Where are the marxists? WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS? *slurp* *sniff* WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued with my shopping, and I heard him chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw him trying to walk out the doors with like fifteen Milky Ways in his hands without paying.

The girl at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Sir, you need to pay for those first.” At first he kept pretending to be tired and not hear her, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter.

When she took one of the bars and started scanning it multiple times, he stopped her and told her to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me. I don’t even think that’s a word. After she scanned each bar and put them in a bag and started to say the price, he kept interrupting her by yawning really loudly.

>> No.12965348
File: 65 KB, 800x427, 1553556657207.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965348

>>12965326
90% of the people making these succinct little cuck posts about Peterson being this or that or an idiot haven't been to university.

They're just larping as educated men.

>> No.12965349

>>12965329
its not like you need to google shit while preparing

>> No.12965351

>>12965339
homoeroticism. i wish i was kidding.

>> No.12965352

>>12965290
lol I'm making t shirts

>> No.12965353

Peterson managed to make Zizek look like a chad

>> No.12965354

>go to Peterson Reddit
>They're saying zizek is hard to understand

Lmfao damage control already

>> No.12965355

>>12965326
Isn't Peterson into Nietzsche? Zizek should have mentioned that Foucault was influenced by Nietzsche.

>> No.12965362

>judeo christian

juden peterstein comes forth

>> No.12965373

Peterson will have a hard time explaining this performance to his wife's son later today

>> No.12965374

>>12965354
kek

>> No.12965376
File: 7 KB, 249x250, 1520654012521.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965376

>Three white men on stage

Not watching

>> No.12965377

>>12965348
>haven't been to university.
literally everybody goes to university now. Retarded 80iq thots go to university

>> No.12965381
File: 43 KB, 400x291, chadzek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965381

>>12965353
zizek IS a chad and always has been

otherwise explain this for me

>> No.12965383

>>12965326
People just spam memes and "epic btfo" garbage, as always. 4chan is just your average people after all

>> No.12965386

>>12965339
Two pseuds realize they can't actually debate with each other because they agree in 99% of things.

>> No.12965387

Tbh zizek has 20 years, life in communist Yugoslavia, 2 PhD on Peterson

>> No.12965389

>>12964908
>I expected a debate and instead got recycled lectures.
lol that's exactly what you should have expected

>> No.12965393

This is a small taste what 4chan felt like circa 2015-16

>> No.12965394
File: 1.17 MB, 1440x900, Medic_Pavilion-Look_At_Me!-Ghost.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965394

>YOU PROMISED ME MARXISTS, PETERSON, YOU PROMISED ME MARXISTS

>> No.12965398

He disowns the conservatives explicitly. This is the great unwinding

>> No.12965400

>>12965354
holy kek

>> No.12965402

>>12965387
But Peterson can speak English.

>> No.12965404

>>12965326
because the postmodern philosophers are almost always criticising modernity, not supporting it, and they almost all (Foucault included) are explicitly opposed to this identity politics bullshit.

>> No.12965407

>>12965044
sounds about right. somehow in modern times, some bizarro eastern euro accent give you authority. truth is, i can barely understand half the shit he is saying - his fucking accent - and i have no big trouble understanding my indian coworkers accents wtf

>> No.12965408

>>12965377
And yet here we are with half the thread screeching that Peterson is a liar and a moron.

His observations regarding the manner in which Marxism is surviving and thriving, under the radar through postmodernist philosophy, is accurate.

>> No.12965409

Is there any difference between Peterson and the most pedestrian type of self help? I'm asking seriously.

>> No.12965411

>>12965354
based reddit spy

>> No.12965413

zizek has the worst slur/lisp hybrid i have ever heard

>> No.12965414

>>12965386
Peterson is basically a socialist-lite, don't know why people think he is some sort of capitalist thinker.

>> No.12965415
File: 2.65 MB, 320x240, 1553283869145.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965415

>>12965394

>> No.12965417

so, now that jordan has become the marxists he claims to hate, when will he join a hippie commune?

>> No.12965418

>>12965394
?

>> No.12965422

>>12965348
You mean like you are ?

>> No.12965425

>>12965404
so essentially 1930 all over again

>> No.12965426

>>12965409
Peterson's is based on actual research.

Doesn't mean it's right, but at least it's not just some randumb spouting off.

>> No.12965427

>>12965409
Peterson has some extra things thrown in there about how Marxism and being trans are bad and Christianity is good

>> No.12965431

I thought the problem would be that Zizek would be too amicable, instead I have Peterson talking like a wounded dog. This is more sad than cathartic really. Nobody really did win this debate did we?

>> No.12965435

>They're actually agreeing about Christianity now
Jesus fucking Christ.

>> No.12965436

>>12965408
then name a postmodern neomarxist lmao

>> No.12965437

>>12965005
But Marxism is nothing more than a critique of capitalism therefore he HAS defended Marxism by using it to effectively critique capitalism.

>> No.12965439

>>12965414
he just kind of ran along with it to please his fans and take more money from them

>> No.12965440

falling in love is a catastrophe!

>> No.12965444

>t-that's why cupid has arrows..heh..
>*sniffles* what? *sniff* yeah, anyway..

>> No.12965446

>>12965354

lmao Peterson absolutely reduced to top tier bull prepper

>> No.12965447

are they drinking heineken?

>> No.12965448

>>12965056
I wonder how long it will take for "Cultural Marxist" to be considered antisemitic?

>> No.12965449

>>12965415
i love this interview so much, the guy who never did his job

>> No.12965450

he's straight up insulting him

>> No.12965451

>>12965431
WHERE ARE THE MARXISTS?

>> No.12965453

>>12965426
>Peterson's is based on actual research.

Peterson's is based on 19th zoology lmaooooooooo

>> No.12965454
File: 676 KB, 1000x815, 1517834131525.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965454

Why is this thread full of cringy leftists?

>> No.12965457

>>12965417
peterson has always been closer to zizek than ben shapiro, I don't know why he was ever looped into the right in the first place but hopefully this helps to break him away from that

>> No.12965458

>>12965343
And we should believe you because...

>> No.12965459

>zizek talks
[rapturous applause]

FAIR
AND
BALANCED

>> No.12965460
File: 93 KB, 680x834, 1554565236608.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965460

>>12965409
Peterson draws from a deep and lucid comprehension of the jungian methodological approach to psychoanalysis. Something that is as difficult to teach as it is to understand for oneself.

This gives Peterson a very unique tool set when approaching problems in his areas of speciality.

>> No.12965462

>>12965409
not really if you are the average jbp fan. he speaks with authority of psychology (not psychoanalysis obviously mind you), but anyone who i have ever met that loves jbp is a deeply depressed person and he helped them out with their lives

i dont find these people pathetic, and this made me sympathize with peteron a bit more

>> No.12965464

>>12965376
unironically based

>> No.12965465

Zizek completely controls the conversation, he's like a teacher giving a private lesson to a promising 20 year old student.

>> No.12965466

>>12965435
you all fuckers only want JBP/ZIZ BTFO compilations. fuck off

>> No.12965468

>>12965404
I didn't say otherwise, but Peterson noticed something that absolutely exists, and that is academics who are part marx, part postmodern, part identity politics, etc. It's sophism to say otherwise. Look at Nietzsche, if you want an odd analogy. Some of his biggest fans are leftists. It would be dishonest to say "Durr Nietzsche was the opposite of the left, so these people don't exist"

>> No.12965471

>>12965377
>literally everybody goes to university now
Barely 50% in most Western countries

>> No.12965472

>"judeo" christian
>capitalist
Pick one and only one. All this christian larping is ridiculous.

>> No.12965474

>>12965454
>>>/pol/
back to your safe space, faggo!

>> No.12965475

Zizek is absolutely disgusting, I cant bare to listen to him for 5 seconds with all that phlegm and nose touching

>> No.12965476

God is an atheist

I honestly think zizek will be read in 100 years with confusion

>> No.12965477

Based Zizek likes G. K. Chesterton.

>> No.12965479

>>12965409
He's written a self-help book. That ought to help you answer your question.

>> No.12965480

>>12965458
kill yourself

>> No.12965482

>>12965418
its a scene from bioshock

>> No.12965484
File: 607 KB, 789x565, based_and_wife_pilled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965484

>>12965339
first 40 minutes
>Peterson says "I couldn't read all (any) of your work" and attacks the communist manifesto at face value
>audience literally laughts and Peterson gets nervous
>btfo himself
Next 40 minutes
>Zizeks bashes lefties he doesn't like and
>gets a bit confusing
>says there's no solution to enviromental Chrises but surely market can't solve it
>is nice to Peterson to not make him look completely stuid
Next 10 minutes
>Peterson pulls a Pinker in defense of capitalism
Next 15 minutes
>Zizek pulls jokes, the audience loves him
Next 5 minutes
>Peterson says Zizek is smart and well read
>Zizek subveredly calls Peterson an idiot
>Zizek asks Peterson who are those Marxists in "Postmostern neo-marxists"
>Peterson seems to have not read anything past his 3 authors.

Brutal.

>> No.12965486

>GOD WAS AN ATHEIST ON THE CROSS
self-plagiarism from Zizek here

>> No.12965493

>>12965454
They get BTFO on /pol/ all the time so they come hide here despite /lit/ being even more right wing

>> No.12965494

>YOURSELF

It's over

>> No.12965495

HOLY SHIT

>> No.12965496

>>12965484
based justin posting

>> No.12965498

>we live in a society

>> No.12965499

he's gone full sniff

>> No.12965500

>>12965459
Hiearchies emerge based on competency no?

>> No.12965501

muh socioeconomic factors

>> No.12965502

>>12965458
>>/reddit/

>> No.12965503

jesus

zizek doesnt respect peterson at all

>> No.12965504

>zizek flailing around like a man having spastic fits
YSSHHR SHHEPERATION FROM SHSHHH GOD IS DIVINITY IN ITSSHHHSHSHSHSHSHSELF

>> No.12965505

>>12965486
He's making my head hurt

>> No.12965506
File: 101 KB, 491x585, 1550052576922.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965506

Whoa, Zizek just asked the first good question in this debate

>> No.12965508
File: 114 KB, 400x381, 1528377914301.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965508

>so on and so on
>*rubs nose*
>*snif*

>> No.12965512
File: 77 KB, 544x527, 1505377662469.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965512

>>12965465
>>12965394
>>12965376
>>12965354
>>12965304
>>12965285
>>12965173

Why are leftists so disgustingly smug and arrogant?

>> No.12965515

>>12965471
Are you aware of what 50% of the population entails in terms of cognitive abilties? Universities were first created and maintained by the literal elite of society

>> No.12965516

>>12965431
Zizek won. He set the terms of the debate and questioned the foundations Peterson's criticism.

>> No.12965517
File: 150 KB, 739x551, 1540146517781.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965517

>>12965339
Basically this

>> No.12965518
File: 8 KB, 255x176, peteyno.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965518

peterson BTFO for all eternity

>> No.12965519

>can a NK'n put his house in order so easily?
Peterson btfo

>> No.12965523

Why did they do a debate one guy has a cold and is slobbering everywhere? Could have waited a week so we can actually understand him

>> No.12965524

>>12965471
>Barely 50% in most Western countries
exactly

>> No.12965525

>>12965448
already is, apparently its a right wing conspiracy theory and has been for several years.
>>12965453
>>12965460
I wish it was zoology, more like alchemy.
>>12965458
filthy, dumb, newfag scum

>> No.12965527
File: 55 KB, 630x555, 1554339714955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965527

>>12965436
I don't really understand the question; it's not a self identification, it's a label of identification via assessment. The label is independent of the self assessment of the identified party.

It's like calling someone a retard.

Few people earnestly self identify as retards. But does that mean they aren't retards, or the label doesn't exist?

Think before you post, retard. The big brains are thinking.

>> No.12965529

>>12965503
He does this with literally everyone

>> No.12965528
File: 74 KB, 1000x1000, 1531639884943.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965528

*snifffffff*
YOURSHELF

>> No.12965530

I don't watch debates, but does the audience usually clap and cheer every time they make an argument?

>> No.12965533

>>12965512
not a leftist desu, im just in it for the memes

>> No.12965535

>>12965484
Zizek is controlling everything on that stage, Peterson is just there to suffer, the moderator was already dead 2 minutes into Zizek's first overtime.

>> No.12965536

What the fuck is with the trannies spamming the YT stream chat?

>> No.12965539

>>12965503
can't really blame him

>> No.12965540

>>12965512
please just let us have this

petersonposting has plauged this board for like 3 years now. zizek has for longer but his threads are just obscurantism and die immediately

>> No.12965541

The absolute state of peterstein-fags

>> No.12965544

>>12965518
you're deluded if you don't think he's having fun with his new bro. in literally two hours they've disagreed maybe three times. in a debate.

>> No.12965545
File: 64 KB, 500x750, 1540059187488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965545

zizek is going in for the kill. now the real show starts

>> No.12965546

>>12965512
BTFO

>> No.12965550

>>12965459
Peterson's on his home turf. If anything he should have the upper hand

>> No.12965551

>>12965506
What was it

>> No.12965552

Tea or coffee?
YES PLEASE

>> No.12965553
File: 1.30 MB, 1440x1080, 1518444735480.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965553

>>12965519
Peterson clearly refers to people living in the free and open west, you leftist moron.

>> No.12965554

>>12965512
he still hasn't named one though

>> No.12965556

>>12965503
Why would he. This ought to be an academic debate, yet Peterson is a mediocre academic. He deserves no respect.

>> No.12965557

>>12965517
this picture is dishonest and this person is scum
so, well composed, I guess

>> No.12965558

who are the fucking retards on the crowd wooing at the arguments, i would die of cringe if i was next to that kind of retard in an auditorium

>> No.12965559

>>12965408
>nobody here has been to university
>not everyone here believes what I believe
>see? Im right

What are you even doing?

>> No.12965561

>>12965529
It's endearing. Everyone is equal.

>> No.12965563

>>12965451
That whole line of questioning was murdering Peterson thoroughly.

>> No.12965565

>>12965512
cope

>> No.12965566

>>12965525
>already is
I'm not surprised, they are trying to make "globalist" antisemitic

>> No.12965567

THERE IT IS. "Thats life" that was it
the killing blow. Ohh nooooo this has no transgressed entertainment into the realm of tragedy.

>> No.12965569

>>12965468
This. Marx was memed endlessly in academia, along with Freud and Nietzsche. It's not quite a socalist interpretation like Marx intended, but it's still ubiquitous.

>> No.12965570

THAT'S LIFE

>> No.12965573

>>12965553
No he's obviously specifically referring to North Koreans

>> No.12965574

>>12964998
yes

>> No.12965576

>>12965503 see >>12965529
Zizek is an idiot, he claims so himself. He doesn't understand the basic niceties of conversation

>> No.12965575

>this is where things get complicated *sigh* ahem.......... i wanna use things to address... ahum the things you mentioned....ahum........

>> No.12965577
File: 16 KB, 480x360, 1547384043814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965577

>>12965552
CAPITALISM OR MARXISM

YES PLEASE

>> No.12965579

M A P S
O
F
M E A N I N G

>> No.12965580

>>12965527
>But does that mean they aren't retards, or the label doesn't exist?
yes, they aren't really retards and because there's no way to assign the label to it doesn't really exist

there has to be a valid answer to the question. who are the postmodern neomarxists? if there are none, then it's a literal spook

>> No.12965581

This is straight up bullying.

>> No.12965582

What Chesterton book did Zizek cite?

>> No.12965585

>>12965468
Yes, but he won't address an obvious link, so we can't progress past that point, can we?
Everyone knows postmodernism was directly inspired by Nietzsche, at least in part, and everyone knows both Marxists and postmodernists have a disgust for capitalism.
But Jordan B. "Yourself" Peterson attacks these policies which are anti-white, anti-male, etc. but is unable to give specifics, while still agreeing that Zizek is right when he points out Marxists do not support this.
How weird.

>> No.12965587

>>12965544
that's not true at all. Zizek thinly-veiled jabs are always covered in a "naive question" or "total agreement", but in reality he's called him an idiot several times already. Honestly, Peterson is taking this quite well and does not seem to take insult

>> No.12965586

>>12965503
Zizek is a professional shitstirer, thats how he comes up with arguments in the first place desu

>> No.12965588

Have either of them named the Jew yet?

>> No.12965589

>muh psychology
literally pseudoscience.

>> No.12965590

ahahah look at zizeks face, hes DISGUSTED

>> No.12965591

>>12965530
Not really but unfortunately Zizek and JP have absolutely awful fanbases. They think it's a brawl when in reality it's merely a conversation.

>> No.12965593

>>12965576
holy shit lobsters damaging control now focusing on manners

>> No.12965594

>>12965533
Even worse. You just hate Peterson because he is popular and you have you personality beyond le ebin 4cin contrarianism. Pure cancer.

>>12965540
Most Peterson threads were made by his detractors. I'll admit that I started browsing /lit/ because Peterson got me into Jung, but I never spammed him on the board and instead tried to broaden my horizons. Just admit that you are some sort of leftist with an ax to grind against this guy and his agenda.

>> No.12965596

>>12965582
Orthodoxy I think

>> No.12965597

the other day I saw a video of chomsky defending AOC's green new deal. Are all commies mentally ill?

>> No.12965598

How long is this shit?

Peterson the psychologist cannot compete with continental psychoanalyst. Zizek has read too fucking much.

>> No.12965600

>my house is messy because I live in a society
is zizek a retard or merely pretending to wind peterson up?

>> No.12965601

>>12965582
Orthodoxy

>> No.12965602
File: 132 KB, 472x329, 1445571070090.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965602

Y O U C A N H E L P M E I F I S T R A Y.
Peterson has accepted Zizek as daddy.

>> No.12965604

>life is intrinsically pessimistic
what the fuck is this shit show

>> No.12965606

How long has been the debate and should I wait until it ends and see it tomorrow?

>> No.12965609

>>12965529
>Humanity is okay but most people are boring idiots

>> No.12965612

>>12965530
It's stupid. I blame North Americlaps.

>> No.12965614

/pol/ here
zizek absolutely dismantling peterstein on his own turf
amazing

>> No.12965615

>>12965567
>you asked three questions instead of one
>that's life
if that's your idea of a BTFO you may as well be WOOing in the audience

>> No.12965616

>>12965553
quit accusing me of not being a Christian

>> No.12965617

>>12965582
Orthodoxy.

>> No.12965620

>>12965597
no, but those two definitely are

>> No.12965621

>>12965551
>Can you set your house in order if society's rules/setup are stopping you from doing so?
Peterson, to my mind, basically assumes that everyone is a high-agency, self-motivated person. 80% of people just want a dignified place in the social-economic order, and won't be able to if society's setup selects against that. Peterson's view just seems really Whig and hyper-Protestant to me

>> No.12965622

>>12965588
numerous subtle allusions to Weininger

>> No.12965624

i just tuned in

they sound like they're about to make out

>> No.12965625

This is simply
Continental vs North American academics

>> No.12965626

>>12965606
Skip the first 30 minutes, it will give you brain cancer, not even kidding.

>> No.12965627

>this is supposed to be about happiness

>> No.12965630

>>12965596
Yeah, didn't hear it well. Thanks

>> No.12965631

>>12965616
I'm not a christian either, faggot. But even worse, you're a tripfag. Go sign up to a forum and never return to this place.

>> No.12965632

It feels like JP is doubting himself

>> No.12965633
File: 8 KB, 303x271, D4jpAr1W4AIoJPG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965633

>tfw you have to listen to a canadian retard

>> No.12965635

Life isn't just suffering Peterson ffs.

>> No.12965637

>>12965530
"debates" are not about ideas anymore, they're about getting content for "x DESTROYS y with FACTS and LOGIC" and "cringe compilation" videos.

>> No.12965640

>>12965606
You should entirely skip the opening statements and focus on the rest. I'm serious. Peterson said nothing for 30 minutes, Z rambled his greatest hits for 35 minutes. It was useless.

>> No.12965643

>starts shilling his book
lmao

>> No.12965645

>>12965503
Nah man, he respects him, that's why he makes fun of him. It's like we curse and love and each other here, dipshit.

>> No.12965647

>>12965635
Underage detected.

>> No.12965648

>>12965621
>Peterson, to my mind, basically assumes that everyone is a high-agency, self-motivated person
I don't think he assumes that so much as that he believes that striving to be that is the best option, even for people who aren't.

>> No.12965649

>>12965627
>this turned out to be about our schadenfreude from Peterson getting raped

>> No.12965651

>>12965621
So basically referring to intelligent white people and not dumb blacks and women

>> No.12965652

Jungian Vs Lacanian-Hegelian

>>12965635
For him it is

>> No.12965653

how can a canadian sound more retarded than a fat sniffing slovenian with a lisp

>> No.12965654

>>12965632
>mfw Peterson becomes a born again Zizekian

>> No.12965655

>>12965393
Wtf are you talking about

>> No.12965657

>>12965593
i've only read Zizek. Sorry you don't know anything about him

>> No.12965658

>>12965635
it is tho

>> No.12965660

He's talking about cleaning houses again

>> No.12965661

>>12965477
Makes sense Chesterton loathed capitalism so much more than socialism.

>> No.12965662

>>12965594
I don't hate Peterson desu, didnt mean to offend anyone i was just taking the piss

>> No.12965663

>>12965585
>but is unable to give specifics, w
Well, he said a quarter of profs fit his description to which Zizek simply repeated his sophism. But yes, Peterson should know the concrete facts of the matter. I honestly just hate both of them after seeing this. because Zizek is full of shit for implying otherwise especially as an academic.

>> No.12965666

>>12965635
You will immediately cease and not continue to access the site if you are under the age of 18.

>> No.12965667

Aight peterson is coming back

>> No.12965668

>>12965635
Zizek says the same thing himself often

>> No.12965669

>>12965625
that's disrespectul to north american academics

>> No.12965672

>>12965527
No, it's not like calling someone a retard, because when you call someone a retard you are explicitly naming them in order to call them a retard.
Or, you are calling a group of people retards, or saying there are retards among them. In which case you should be able to name one individual you consider a retard, regardless of their self-identification.
You must be able to give at least one name if they exist.

>> No.12965675

>>12965637
not really, the crowd making it that way is kind of sad really. but you can see that those two would have an honest organized conversation that would be much better if it would be set up at a studio without retarded crowds

>> No.12965676

Doesn't matter, many Peterson fans are 5th avenue fanatics, and he'll be making the rounds this week on damage control, saying he was thrown off, zizek was obtuse, or whatever.

>> No.12965678
File: 30 KB, 225x350, 98891.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965678

AND-

>> No.12965679

>>12965484
based Justin murphy should have been in the debate

>> No.12965680

>>12965632
I think he's realising his fame was built upon his responses to a strawman. I'm not even kidding, it seems he actually respects what Zizek is saying as feels insecure because he was arguing against his own mind, not against third party ideas.

>> No.12965683
File: 99 KB, 1200x715, Arthur_Schopenhauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965683

>>12965635
Stop being such a brainlet.

>> No.12965685

>let me point out the 3 things you addressed
>addresses none and goes into making similarities with his psychiatry work and how it relates to capitalism making people happy

>> No.12965687

>>12965647
>>12965666
nope.jpg
>>12965652
kek
>>12965658
that just comes from buddhist horsehit tho
>>12965668
i'm not in either of these camps

>> No.12965689
File: 69 KB, 1560x226, Screen Shot 2019-04-19 at 10.08.39 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965689

OH NO NO NO

>> No.12965690

look at that body language
Zizek is relaxed, slouched, unconcerned with his opponent
peterson is erect, at attention, stuttering, as if he was just dropped into the lion's den and he forgot his gun

>> No.12965691

Why doesn't the larger academic simply eat the smaller one

>> No.12965693

>>12965651
The white working class in the midwest US and northern england overdosing on opiods don't need to 'get their house in order' - they've been systematically betrayed by a governing elite that has crafted a socioeconomic system that has failed them.

>> No.12965694
File: 941 KB, 674x728, 1555725954513.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965694

>> No.12965697
File: 13 KB, 236x291, 1547327797171.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965697

>>12965657
response?

>> No.12965699

>talking about women as if they were some second party

>> No.12965700

This moderator doesn't understand the Stalin jokes

>> No.12965701

what if society was encouraging people to have messy rooms. What then???

>> No.12965702

>>12965676
Peterson is going to say it was an interesting conversation, but then will say Zizek isn't a "real Marxist"

>> No.12965703

>both left and right watch the show
Peterson deliberately lose himeself because else lefts would not watch it. He became a straw man for pay.

>> No.12965704

>all the brainlets in this thread thinks that it's Zizek vs Peterson
>in reality it's more like Zizek and Peterson have more in common than anyone thinks and that Zizek is a step ahead of Peterson in some areas
>Peterson fails to address how one person can change anything if they're too oppressed

>> No.12965708

FELIX COOLPA

>> No.12965709

>>12965580
A postmodern neo-marxists is an ideologue of the postmodern philosophy of though, who also holds true to the ideological presuppositions of Marxism .

I'm having a really hard time understand g why you brainlet posters don't understand something so simple.

>> No.12965711

>>12965691
unironically this

>> No.12965712
File: 339 KB, 600x800, 1546856333221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965712

>>12965691
It's a doggy dog world.

>> No.12965713

>>12965680
He really feels candid in his self-doubt, as well. If it is not just a rhetorical trick, why hasn't he realized it earlier? Surely, someone must have told him? Maybe the high from being famous and a guru made him lose sight of that which he was actually interested in to begin with

>> No.12965714

>>12965689
BASED

>> No.12965715

>>12965693
No I'm pretty sure they should stop taking opioids like fucking retards

>> No.12965717

>>12965690
Peterson is trying, Zizek, as usual, just rambles off shallow talking points.

>> No.12965718

>>12965694
They should do a stream debate from their own homes like this.

>> No.12965720

I think a reading of Hegel will do good for peterson

>> No.12965721

It's clear that Zizek is a philosopher and Pidorson is a psychologist who wrote a self-help book.

>> No.12965724

here come the toilets

>> No.12965725

>>12965704
Zizek is Peterson translated into the politico-philosophical domain.

Peterson is still stuck in applied psychology.

>> No.12965726

I d e o l o g y

>> No.12965727

>>12965720
Unironically IQ to low

>> No.12965729
File: 195 KB, 512x382, 1555392361446.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965729

ZIZEK IS TALKING ABOUT TOILETS AGAIN

>> No.12965731
File: 8 KB, 203x248, 1522356074806.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965731

>>12965721
>maps of meaning is a self help book
Okay, retard.

>> No.12965730

>>12965690
Zizek has been doing this same act since the 90s. I love him but he never brings too many new things to the table. I guess not changing your stance isn't a bad thing though

>> No.12965732

>>12965678
?

>> No.12965734

>>12965714
link to the reddit?

>> No.12965736

>>12965721
>It's clear that Zizek is a philosopher
yeah, a bad one

>> No.12965737

he's literally talking about toilets.

>> No.12965738

>>12965130
zizek's clown public persona is different from zizek the academic. he does this on purpose, probably.

>> No.12965739

>>12965702
Yeah, this sadly. Just like how he says everyone who is moral is actually secretly christian.

>> No.12965740

>>12965621
Your worth in any system is determined by the optimal outcome of your potential being exercised; the system itself can only hinder, never help, if it does not account for the potential for change and moral emepricism.

>> No.12965741

What is the ideology of taking a shit?

>> No.12965742

>>12965724
>memerson talks about cleaning your room
>sheesheck makes toilet jokes
this is what i wanted two hours ago

>> No.12965745

>>12965729
what did the post modern Marxist mean by this?

>> No.12965746
File: 996 KB, 1024x761, 249690462.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965746

>>12965709

>> No.12965748

>>12965738
this
zizek is socdomming every single opponent in debates by doing this

>> No.12965750

>>12965468
To be fair Peterson did more than just say professors exist who are some combination of those three things. He has a whole elaborate theory on them.

>> No.12965751

>>12965694
Zizek surprisingly looks neater than Mr Set your house in order

>> No.12965752

>>12965703
holy shit this post kek

>> No.12965753

Why do people thinks peterson is gonna defeat Zizek at his home turf area of expertise?

>oh wow, I'm a psychologist, I'm sure gonna beat a marxist on marxism

wow.

>> No.12965758

>>12965691
they don't call him a great debaiter for nothing

>> No.12965759

Jordan Peterson is cancelled. No refunds will be issued.

>> No.12965760

>>12965672
When I call you a postmodernist neomarcist I am doing so in order to communicate your properties to myself and others. Retard.

>> No.12965762
File: 225 KB, 2400x2400, aSVjtu7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965762

dude can zizek chill? hes actually making this shit LETHAL... I feel bad

>> No.12965763

>so... So... How...

>> No.12965764
File: 51 KB, 250x250, a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965764

>>12965737
ideology

>> No.12965765
File: 101 KB, 244x295, 1512908764329.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965765

>>12965715
>millions of people in similar circumstances just so happen to make an enormously self-destructive choice

Most people are not smart or independent thinkers. Blaming them for making bad choices when they have few avenues to achieve a dignified existence in today's society is inhumane. Read Carlyle (if you haven't already)

>> No.12965767

Peterson looks so damn tired.

>> No.12965769

>>12965741
the original joke talks about anglo and french toilets too:

>In a traditional German toilet, the hole into which shit disappears after we flush is right at the front, so that shit is first laid out for us to sniff and inspect for traces of illness. In the typical French toilet, on the contrary, the hole is at the back, i.e. shit is supposed to disappear as quickly as possible. Finally, the American (Anglo-Saxon) toilet presents a synthesis, a mediation between these opposites: the toilet basin is full of water, so that the shit floats in it, visible, but not to be inspected. [...] It is clear that none of these versions can be accounted for in purely utilitarian terms: each involves a certain ideological perception of how the subject should relate to excrement. Hegel was among the first to see in the geographical triad of Germany, France and England an expression of three different existential attitudes: reflective thoroughness (German), revolutionary hastiness (French), utilitarian pragmatism (English).

>> No.12965771

inb4 stirner

>> No.12965772

>>12965759
NO
NOOOO I WANT MY PETERSONCOIN REFUNDED

>> No.12965774

why the fuck did happiness come up, shouldn't have been attached now they can just talk shit.

>> No.12965776

FFS I wanted zizek to tell his full toilet joke

>> No.12965779

>>12965669

NA academics are subhumans

>> No.12965780
File: 14 KB, 1036x191, uhoh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965780

>>12965734
https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/comments/bf5xcb/jordan_peterson_vs_slavoj_žižek_live_debate/

>> No.12965783
File: 52 KB, 486x418, jbp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965783

>when you get btfo by a toilet metaphore

>> No.12965784

>>12965760
THEN NAME ONE SINGLE PERSON YOU CONSIDER A POSTMODERN NEOMARXIST YOU FUCKING IDIOT

>> No.12965786

I think peterson's chances of winning just got flushed down the toilet.

>> No.12965787

>>12965774
it's the topic of the talk

>> No.12965788

>>12965762
literal fatality

>> No.12965789

Jordan is getting absolutely cucked by this point

>> No.12965790

>>12965704
Alexander solzhenitsyn literally brought the Soviet union to its knees from inside a gulag nigga

>> No.12965791

>>12965709
He couldn't even name a single one of those supposed ~postmodern neo-marxist~ and got blatantly called out for it, just stop retard.

>> No.12965792

>>12965753
the funny thing is zizek has studied psychoanalysis his whole life, so it's not like peterson has an advantage on the field of psychology (in fact, jungians tend to be perceived as imbeciles by other psychoanalysts)

>> No.12965795

>>12965765
Yeah I'll take lessons on good life decisions and self ownership from an anime poster

>> No.12965796

>>12965776
There are like 3 videos of him telling that joke on youtube

>> No.12965798

>>12965780
how did he destroy the premise?

>> No.12965799

>zizek approaches the problem of modernity from the social level
>peterson approaches it from the personal level
>each reflects their own background and expertise
>each complement the other
besides peterson's embarrassment in first wading into marxist theory this is actually pretty comfy

>> No.12965803

>>12965780
I actually think Peterson is saying some decent stuff now. The start and his first reply were a fucking disaster though,

>> No.12965804

>I WANT TO SOLICIT A JOKE
based zizek

>> No.12965806
File: 993 KB, 250x250, 1535482799157.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965806

So... so... uh...

>> No.12965805

>>12965789

He's definitely prepping a lot of bulls

>> No.12965808

>>12965780
Dr. Zizek Is my new best friend

>> No.12965809

>>12965780
i left after reading 3 comments, that place is forsaken by god

>> No.12965810

>>12965690
This. As far as rhetoric goes, Zizek is absolutely beating out Peterson, and Peterson absolutely is less in control of the conversation because of it.

>> No.12965811

>tell a joke

Trying to hint at him to lighten up

>> No.12965812

>>12965637
People usually clap when they hear points they agree with. They may clap and cheer if they really agree.

>> No.12965817

Late to the party, anyone got the stream link ?

>> No.12965816

>>12965799
this

>> No.12965818

>>12965780
>https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/comments/bf5xcb/jordan_peterson_vs_slavoj_žižek_live_debate/
>go to the users profile
>it's a crossposer from chapo trap house

Why are leftists so dishonest? Smug ignorant pricks.

>> No.12965819

>>12965795
Yawn

>> No.12965820

n word or all meat diet for bingo

>> No.12965821
File: 12 KB, 214x300, MaxWeb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965821

>where are the marxists?

>> No.12965822

>>12965817
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q46AoR80M4&feature=youtu.be+%5BEmbed%5D

>> No.12965823

>>12965792
so the debate is pretty much a 150 IQ PHD psychology professor versus a real intelectual?

what degrees zizek has?

>> No.12965825

>>12965817
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRC5AA1wF0

>> No.12965828
File: 238 KB, 365x365, 1553717979086.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965828

>>12965746
>Call someone a postmodernist neomarxist because they hold true both pressupositional axioms of the two philosophies as ideologically sound.

>"Uhmm, actually, sweetie, I self identify as not being a marxist, so, you're actually wrong."

Retard.

>> No.12965829

>>12965780
>account made 20 minutes ago

>> No.12965831

>>12965818
because "leftists" as a social group are reactionary

>> No.12965833

>>12965818
why are you fucking retarded and get baited?

>> No.12965834

>>12965822
>>12965825
thanks

>> No.12965835

fuck this audience

>> No.12965836

>reads Demons once

>> No.12965840

>>12965818
>active in r/Peterson and r/thedonald

>> No.12965842

>>12965823

>150 IQ

citation please. And no, I am not taking Peterson's word for that.

>> No.12965843

>>12965823
Plumber

>> No.12965845

>>12965799
super comfy. zizek obviously likes peterson and peterson is agreeing with almost everything zizek said. the tribes are keeping score but these two are just enjoying each other's company. i've never seen so many compliments thrown back and forth in a debate

>> No.12965846

>>12965823
Doctorate in philosophy, doctorate in psychoanalysis

>> No.12965848

>>12965746
That's dad and me every night at the dinner table.

>> No.12965849

>like ayn rand
O NONONON NO N O

>> No.12965850

>>12965738
Zizek is no clown at all, he just has thing for jokes and uses them well, but his points are quite clear.

>> No.12965851

>>12965823
>what degrees zizek has?
lol

Peterson fanboys everyone.

>> No.12965852

>>12965767
that's what happens when you live on MACHO MAN diet and wont eat your stupid feminist carrots

>> No.12965853
File: 82 KB, 914x486, Screen Shot 2019-04-19 at 10.18.54 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965853

>>12965780
JESUS ZIZZY STAHP

>> No.12965854

>>12965819
Yeah go wank to your hentai cartoons little bitch

>> No.12965855

>>12965828
>still fail to name a single example of a postmodern neomarxist despite being asked twice

>> No.12965858

>>12965835
>>>/pol/

>> No.12965859

>>12965784
Literally every sociology professor I've ever met? Multiple people I've met in my life and in university?

You're basically just asking for a FAMOUS postmodernist neomarxist.

They're retards, why would they do anything noteworthy? Maybe Stalin at a stretch.

>> No.12965860

peterson is so fucking boring to listen to. how the fuck does this guy have fans.

>> No.12965862

the crowd is masturbating so hard

>> No.12965863
File: 337 KB, 600x399, 1527325651528.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965863

>> No.12965867

>>12965833
>poster smells of false flagging
>check him
>turns out I was right
>call it out
>HURRRR DURRR YOU FELL FOR THE BAIT XD

Fuck you.

>>12965849
He is criticizing Rand, you moron.

>> No.12965868

>>12965842
I'm around 130 and peterson is clearly smarter than me, so he should be at least 140.

>>12965846
nice, how he expected to BTFO a philosopher in a debate?

>> No.12965870

>>12965772
self-help routine No. #231

>> No.12965872

Zizek with the classic
>I agree with you
>BUT

>> No.12965874

>>12965823
a philosophy phd. the thing is "philosophy" is a natural gateway to freud, which jung is derivative of, and lacan, which is zizek's focus. so zizek is not an actual analyst, but he's a theorist of psychoanalysis (or rather, he takes the theory of psychoanalysis into account when he does his own stuff).

>> No.12965875

I wish they'd just talk about Marxism rather than happiness desu

>> No.12965878
File: 86 KB, 946x303, jp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965878

OH NO NO NO

>> No.12965882

>>12965799
Agreed. Peterson is honestly a lot more likeable than normal in this, if only because Zizek is the, in his own way, the better speaker.

>> No.12965885
File: 286 KB, 498x203, sneed.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965885

>>12965854
anime weebsite, nerd

>> No.12965888

>>12965859
>Maybe Stalin at a stretch
holy shit lmao

>> No.12965889

>>12965855

>>12965250

>> No.12965891

>Ya know who says this greatly?
>Heinrich Himmler of SS

>> No.12965893

>German officers must do horrible things
what

>> No.12965894

>>12965005
To defend Marxism all you need to do is point out the shortcomings of capitalism.

>> No.12965895
File: 79 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965895

>>12965872
>b-but what wtf slavoj

>> No.12965896

>>12965853
>>12965878
>>12965780

Fuck off to reddit.

>> No.12965898

>>12965867
>calling out something obvious

>> No.12965901

>>12965874
do basically is like a CS PHD faggot trying to outclass a Math PHD on math?

>> No.12965902

>>12965828
You're a child who refuses to grow up and right now you are defending the joel olsteen of philosophy

>> No.12965905
File: 24 KB, 308x450, 1550081094132.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965905

>peterson has a different type of water to zizek

>> No.12965908

>>12965690
Both have always behaved like that, you idiot.

>> No.12965912

Not watching it, why zizek mentioned the toilet joke?

>> No.12965914

What book did Himmler keep in his pocket? I couldn't understand

>> No.12965915

>>12965850
his points are not that clear when he talks. i mean maybe they're clear in the shallow insight porn sense, but they're lacking in rigorous argumentation, which is actually present in his more relevant books. he also tends to digress like hell and end his train of thought with some false "aha" moment instead of developing an exposition.

>> No.12965919

>>12965845
Compliments? He called lobster man an idiot to his face.

>> No.12965920

>>12965868

Not real data. Stop glorifying this hack.

>> No.12965922

Holy shit, Zizek is actually going on about Jews now

>> No.12965924

>>12965867
>He is criticizing Rand, you moron.
i think thats what he meant dude

>> No.12965925

>>12965894
but capitalism has changed while tankies are still in an 1800s mindset

>> No.12965927
File: 85 KB, 324x267, af1d319d5e372377cbffe25b0be2dc26db1288062390feae861bb1e6c7fce5e7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965927

>>12965854
You sound a little mad. Why don't you take it easy? Maybe watch some anime to calm you down?

>> No.12965932

>>12965912
of course
he even trotted out the jealous husband

>> No.12965933

>>12964775
>being interested in what Zizek is saying while trying to ignor how he pronounces the word "book" the way it looks.
>boook

>> No.12965934

>>12965828
Zizek's point was actually the contrary. That Peterson takes what people say they identify with as true and that they are not marxists precisely because they do not agree or most don't even know what Marx's is about.

>> No.12965935
File: 80 KB, 1138x288, kek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965935

Kek, thanks for linking this, this thread is amazing.

>> No.12965936

>>12965891
in case you didn't know he was a nazi lol

>> No.12965937

Shut it down

>> No.12965938
File: 144 KB, 1252x1252, 1435640643545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965938

>>12965721
You use the term "philosopher" as if it's something to be proud of.

>> No.12965939

>>12965901
Peterson would be the CS here.

>> No.12965942

>>12965914
The Bhagavad Gita, sacred text of hinduism

>> No.12965944

>>12965927
Only anime I watch is Jojo because it's about manly men who uplift each other not little underage girls getting raped

>> No.12965945

>>12965894
Not at all, you shoukd be able to argue why marxism is better. They both agreed on same problems but zizek never offered an alternative

>> No.12965947

>>12965902
only intended to produce the chad virgin meme

>> No.12965948

>>12965823
IQ has little to do with it. This is a matter crystallized intelligence, and Zizek just has a lot, lot more to draw from. Doesn't necessarily make him right, but it makes him incredibly difficult to respond to.

>> No.12965949
File: 93 KB, 1280x720, 1553829354721.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965949

>>12965927
good taste

>> No.12965955

>>12965938
you sure about that "bro"

>> No.12965958
File: 151 KB, 237x313, 1508791358914.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965958

Holy shit, this entire board is filled with left wing children who listen to chapo.

>> No.12965959

>>12965818
>be leftist
>make joke post
>rightist gets mad
>rightist invests time into investigating your reddit account
>rightist calls you dishonest

>> No.12965961

KILLS YOU IN TE COSMIC DANCE OF PHENOMENA

>> No.12965963
File: 152 KB, 638x479, 1536312556049.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965963

>>12965925
Industrial democracy is the future of the left imo, but it relies accepting the market and free trade so it's dead on arrival.

>> No.12965964

>>12965942
Thanks.

>> No.12965965

>>12965920
>>12965948
I would put peterson in the top 5-2 % world rank in terms of intelligence.

he's clearly smarter than me, and I'm way more smarter than people on 110 range.

>>12965939
yeah, pretty much.

You can't simply win a debate with marxist.
The only way to win a debate with marxists is with a fucking bullet in their heads.

>> No.12965966

>>12965944
>Only anime I watch is Jojo because it's about manly men
lol sure

>> No.12965969
File: 321 KB, 923x596, 1552703661307.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965969

Oh my god, the moderator has basically said "maybe the real debate was the friends we made along the way??"

>> No.12965972

comfy last words

>> No.12965973

>>12965875
that would be not fair and low quality

>> No.12965977
File: 30 KB, 502x443, 1521377971005.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965977

>people should communicate

>> No.12965979

>>12965959
>rightist invests time into investigating your reddit account
Literally 4 seconds. What is wrong with you? Were you dropped on your head as a child?

>> No.12965981

>>12965963
the market can't be defeated unless you have 1984 central planning Skynet.

>> No.12965983
File: 35 KB, 484x497, 1524590941175.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965983

>>12965969

>> No.12965986

>>12965959
its not even mine kek

>> No.12965988

>>12965963
>Industrial democracy is the future of the left imo
The future of the Left is actually in mass graves because the only significant leftists are spurring on the race war

>> No.12965990

>>12965965
Nobody cares how intelligent Peterson or anyone is. All that matters is what you do with that intelligence.

>> No.12965993
File: 1.25 MB, 1242x1699, 1433454644.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12965993

>> No.12965994

>there's a dogma doing around on college campuses that people has nothing unique to say...
>goes into his trademark canned response

>> No.12965998

>>12965981
Agreed, but not everyone is as clever as we are and some of those people are leftists who won't let go of their COMPETITION BAD MARKET BAD REGULATION GOOD NATIONALISATION GOOD policies.

>> No.12966004

>>12965990
well, peterson should focus on writing self help books and making videos so incels stop being incels, that's like his purpose in life, not debating marxist on marxism.

>> No.12966005

>>12965993
I'm really liking this meme.

>> No.12966006

>>12965993
Heh

>> No.12966009

Stream died..

>> No.12966013

That was fun.

>> No.12966014

wew, he shaked the hand that zizek wipes his nose with

>> No.12966015

why the fuck did he put his hand on zizek shoulder when he was talking smiling awkwardly did he have a retard moment or something

>> No.12966017
File: 79 KB, 1280x720, cap_[Erai-raws] Sewayaki Kitsune no Senko-san - 01 [720p]_00:22:52_08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966017

>>12965944
You should probably branch out a little, it's no fun watching the same type of thing all the time. I recommend "Sewayaki Kitsune No Senko-san", it's very relaxing.

Alternatively you can get the fuck out of 4channel and go back to wherever you came from you spastic. This is an anime website.

>> No.12966018
File: 46 KB, 734x672, 1446223382559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966018

This was comfy.

>> No.12966019

>>12965993
kek

>> No.12966022

>>12965981
read Cockshott

>> No.12966024
File: 12 KB, 380x405, 1517933098791.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966024

>>12965993

>> No.12966025

Moldbug rumored to be in attendance

>> No.12966026

HAHAHAHAHAH LOBSTER

>> No.12966027

Important strawpoll

https://www.strawpoll.me/17849942

https://www.strawpoll.me/17849942

>> No.12966031

Peterson's silence , holy shit

>> No.12966032

>>12966015
"im proud of you, sonny boy.
you gave your papa a real fight this time."

>> No.12966037

I guess this is what happens when Peterson doesn't select the venue and the audience.

>> No.12966038

>>12965965
IQ doesn't automatically mean less ignorant.

>> No.12966039

>>12965915
Ah well, I'm biased because I've listened/read so much of him I don't have to be convinced, he may say "toilets, coca cola, going to grandma" and I understand his argument.

>> No.12966043

>>12965998
they're pretty much irrelevants.

Capitalism won.
Politicians today literally suck the multinationals dick so they put some shitty factory and give him jobs.

Trump has sucked dick to multinationals so they put some factories to old boomers.
Apple and Samsung literally hold more economic power than most nations.

>> No.12966044

>>12966025
no one rumored to care

>> No.12966045

>>12965512
in its core, yes

>> No.12966049

>>12966015
shit was liquid cringe reminds me when I blank out after preparing to say something

>> No.12966051

>if you are a leftist, you are not obligated to follow the political correctness
do you agree?

>> No.12966053

Lmfao this debate was better than I expected

>>12966015
Canadian doesn't understand the ex communist Yugoslav

>> No.12966059

>>12966031
i felt it

>> No.12966065

>>12966022
retarded wishfull thinking companies will simply gave up on their economic power if we just think of the power of friendship and vote for socialism.

>> No.12966069

Wait, it's over? I wasn't paying attention, who won?

>> No.12966070

>>12966051
yes, the dirtbag left is the only way anon

>> No.12966071

so thats it, peterson is finally dead.
press S to spit

>> No.12966072

>>12965981
The idea is not to defeat it, but to moderate it.

>> No.12966073

>>12966051
SHIVERS

>> No.12966074

well, this was a fun friday. Have any plans for the rest of the night?

>> No.12966076

did the stream just die? wtf

>> No.12966079

>>12966038
peterson is quite less ignorant than most of the population.

>> No.12966080

zizek "won" mostly because I spews out a lot of ideas really fast, and people are much less familiar with them than peterson's so they appear fresh and interesting. That's not to say peterson did well in this though.

>> No.12966089

>>12966074
its 5 in the morning

>> No.12966090

>>12966069
the streamer

>> No.12966093

am i a brainlet for not feeling like i got much out of this?

>> No.12966096

We can all say thanks to Shrek for filming this debate

>> No.12966097

I genuinely think Peterson was shocked when he started reading zizek

>> No.12966113
File: 620 KB, 3000x3000, 1552223856669.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966113

>>12966051
*AHEM*

>> No.12966114

>>12966072
the market is already regulated on most western nations retard.

>> No.12966116

I wish they hadn't done that 30 minute thing in the beginning. The back and forth was much better.

>> No.12966117

>>12966074
Watch chess lectures.

>> No.12966119

>>12965912
He literally asked Peterson to start saying more jokes

>> No.12966126

So what I've gathered from this thread is that marxism is just critique of capitalism but offers no alternatives or solutions, and doesn't need to either?

Doesn't that make everyone a marxist? I doubt anyone thinks capitalism is perfect

>> No.12966131

>>12966080
Zizek won because his 'opponent' was too stupid to read any of Marx's works and instead his entire exposure to Marxist thought was a short pamphlet about communism made to radicalize random barely literate workers.

>> No.12966133

>>12966080
That's interesting. My perception as someone who knows some Zizek but never watched much Peterson was that Zizek did a terrible job of actually dismantling Peterson's garbage (which was obvious garbage), and instead retreated to enumerating his endlessly repetitive talking points he always does on every talk. And then they just started conversing about nothing while pretending they were "bouncing off ideas" or some stupid shit. Ironic that Zizek made a statement about anti-PC when you could easily read most of this debate as both of them adhering to the political correctness expected of debaters in this sort of event.

>> No.12966154

>>12966126
No but dude like, material bases and class conflict and sheeeit

>> No.12966155

>>12966126
yikes

>> No.12966164
File: 192 KB, 600x399, 1510250848014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966164

>>12966093
No. Peterson obviously hasn't seriously engaged with Marx's writing, but Zizek never really responded to his critiques. His only response was to (rightly) say that Marx didn't envision things simply as 'le oppressor vs oppressed'. After that it was just them agreeing that they dislike PC culture

>> No.12966165

>>12966126
Marx did offer alternatives but most of his work is criticism of bourgeois society and he didn't really go into extreme detail of what communist socoery would entail.

>> No.12966167

>>12965458
Not even Reddit is this stupid.

>> No.12966173

>>12966133
pretty on point anon

>> No.12966177

>>12966051
Identity politics and PC culture are cancers that are killing the left

>> No.12966181
File: 408 KB, 1536x2048, 68598527.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966181

>>12966080
Where have i heard similar rhetoric before about people that easily bash on conservative figures

>> No.12966183

4CHAN IS NOW BREADPILLED, I REPEAT, 4CHAN IS NOW BREADPILLED

>What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.

t. Karl Marx, On the Jewish Question

>> No.12966185

>>12966126
marxism is not about pointing out capitalism is bad. 'critique' here means something different, and what marx really criticised in this sense was political economy, which was the understanding that bourgeois intellectuals had of their own society, not "capitalism". this critique is what leads to the notions of revolution being needed, that this revolution needs to be carried out on class lines by the proletariat, that capitalism itself provides the necessary requirements for its own downfall, etc.

>> No.12966194

>>12966080
Petersons ideas on Marxism and Postmodernism are hackery and lies. That's the victory. Who the fuck cares about winning a cash grab debate trophy? People laughed and cheered because it's justice when conmen are exposed. His other work, the Jungian and anthropological spirit rambling lectures, fall along the lines you described.

>> No.12966195

Can someone tell me what the point of this was? What were they even talking about at the end? Zizek could have gone way more into Peterson's lack of knowledge about marx

>> No.12966209

>>12966183
Marx was a Jew and Marxism is just secular Talmudism

>> No.12966214

>>12966195
that would not be nice

>> No.12966216

>>12966133
I called it before the debate even started, it was obvious that Zizek would be much more interested in an actual discussion rather than simply listing all the bullshit one by one.

>> No.12966219

>>12966183
dont let /pol/ read auschwitz or the great alibi

>> No.12966221

>>12966080
If Peterson immediately started with his psychology stuff and 'capitalism good' instead of ranting about the fucking communist manifesto of all things with his high school level knowledge of marxism he would have looked a lot better. His retarded opening statement made him autolose in many peoples' eyes.

>> No.12966225

so I just threw out my copies of maps of meaning and 12 rules, what are some starting Zizek core I should start reading?

>> No.12966239

>>12966225
Capital, vol. I-III

>> No.12966240

>>12966209
It's much closer to secular christianity actually.

>> No.12966247

>>12966225
Just watch his lectures, all his books are just rambling excerpts of his talks

>> No.12966249

>>12966225
As a bare minimum you need to read all 3 volumes of Capital, as well as Marx's entire personal correspondence

>> No.12966258

>>12966195
If he did that Solzhenitsyn would rise from the dead and write an extra section to the gulag archipelago

>> No.12966268

>>12966126
all the proposed solutions in history by marxists have ended up in holodomor shit.

At least capitalism seem to work even if poorly.

>> No.12966270

>>12966177
i agree, but what is the solution? are we to let the left evolves into a pathetic and rotten corpse as the right has done?

>> No.12966272

>>12966195
That would serve no purpose other than ego stroking and I think he is beyond it at his point. They just want to talk about shit in front of a big audience hoping that people may hear some cool ideas here and there and maybe inspire further thinking. They pretty much said that multiple times.

>> No.12966274

>>12966240
Exposed for knowing nothing about Christianity

>> No.12966293

>>12966274
"He who does not work, neither shall he eat" is literally from the bible.

>> No.12966302

i need a debate like this every friday to fill the gap i have within

>> No.12966306

>>12966270
I honestly don't thing there is a solution and it will only keep getting worse until some global humanitarian crisis happens(world war, cataclysmic natural event, meteor of a fucking alien invasion)

>> No.12966308

>>12966181
>"oh, the debate of the century is happening..."
>"eh, well I guess we can listen to it, but I'm going to play Apex on high volume while we do."
>"ehh, you know what guys, I'm tired from smashing 20 year-pld pussy I'm gonna call it in..."
>"OH, and I'm going to canada for a quickie too btw"
>"Seeya!"
Destiny is such a bastard.

>> No.12966324

>>12966308
He'll go over it tomorrow probably, the shit was really fucking long too

>> No.12966333

I used to enjoy Zizek in 2011 or so, before I became a 'right-winger' (neoliberal, but with non-interventionist conservative sympathies, besides overall conservative skepticism), and now I am reminded why. It's good to see there are still left-wingers who don't buy the simplistic worldview which you usually see expressed by people coming from English and 'Studies' departments.

At any rate, I still think he didn't even bother to address the liberal (as in: free market + democracy + freedoms) consensus from any perspective that reminds one of your usual Marxism. But then again, Marxism is now mostly an empty label, and has been so at least since the Frankfurt school (who were mainly cultural critics, and not the best ones at that, but anyway).

Peterson 'won', in the sense that he provided the stats which show - maybe there's not much scientific rigor in those, but at least it's the best information we've got - that capitalism is a better system for human happiness than communism is. You can certainly quibble about the definition of human happiness as much as you want, but in the end of the day a guy drinking at a bar with his friends is still happier than you and there's nothing you can do about it. Facts were on Peterson's side: capitalism is the best economic system we have. In terms of actual argumentation and rhetoric, Zizek did somewhat better, I think - or at least he tended to be more acute and made more memorable interventions than Peterson did, although he was never able to structure his ideas as well as Peterson did at the end of his first answer to the Slovenian's initial statement.

Another problem is that Peterson comes from a psychological-scientific (with some idiotic psychoanalytic and, yeah, self-help) perspective, while Zizek comes from a continental, philosophical one.

It clearly showed. Peterson provided the data for his quite clear, simple and succinct argument; Zizek digressed on a lot of unnecessary topics, but in the end it was good for his image, because he managed to show how Peterson's understanding of the terms he uses (neo-marxist post-modernism) is very lacking in terms of nuance and actual reading of the relevant and very vast bibliography.

Peterson: 6.5 (did his job)
Zizek: 5.5
Dave Rubin: 4.0 (I expected more interventions from that fine-looking, good-natured man)
Crowd: 10 (clapped after Zizek told them to stop clapping)

>> No.12966339

>>12966324
The bastard better go over it tomorrow.

>> No.12966342

>>12966293
It takes a talmudic Jew to refer to pickings in a text of a work that is all about spirit. Go read John and Kant&Hegel then come back to me you nasty little shyster

>> No.12966343

any reading recc's for understanding zizek's view on PC left?

>> No.12966359

>>12966343
meh just watch yt vids

>> No.12966360

>>12966306
consumerism is getting irrelevant.

There will be a newer model after this crisis and the newer model will care more about being enviromentally friendly simply because resources aren't infinite so they shouldn't be wasted.

There will be a lot of more clusters and local production using 4D printing and such newer technologies.

Optimization of the use of resources and circular economy will replace our current system.

Also companies will gain more and more political and social power and nations will become and more irrelevant (also politcians will be irrelevant in the future).

>> No.12966375

>>12966185
But did marx not describe the ideal society as one where workers own the factories and there are no classes or government, i.e communism? I can certainly see marxist elements in how capitalism has and will play out (most likely leading into social democracy), but I take issue with this notion of ideal society Marx had. I suppose Zizek didn't agree with it either

>> No.12966380

>>12966343
he wrote a couple articles

basically you'd be called alt-right if you repeated them to the rainbow club

>> No.12966392

>>12966333
By the way, I don't want my statement that Peterson 'won' the debate sound like it probably did sound.

In fact, that was rather more a conversation than a debate. None of the people involved did win.

It's just that capitalism really is better for human happiness than communism, and Peterson merely showed it.

Other than that, they had a very nice conversation, and seemed to agree with each other a lot more than one would otherwise expect, specially perhaps because they focused a lot on what they have in common - namely psychoanalysis, which by the way is a pseudoscience, but that's besides the point that I am making.

>> No.12966397

>>12966195
Zizek was unironically feeling bad for Peterson

>> No.12966404
File: 82 KB, 960x660, 50516708_2750613768497330_5904885385464381440_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966404

This season, the anti-idpol left returns

>> No.12966408
File: 7 KB, 207x243, 550.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966408

>>12966378
>Then, as leftists
You're a Leftist now, thought you're just some faggot on a forum

>> No.12966419

>>12966225
"my gott, it's pure ideology"
there, that's zizek

>> No.12966431

>>12966392
>>12966333
Only intelligent post in this thread. Meanwhile all the lefties are doing is smug underage shitposting.

>> No.12966437

>>12966404
meh. they'll just continue ignoring us and call us strasserites. forget the left

>> No.12966461

>>12966408
Yeah cool

>> No.12966462

>>12966404
Hmmm, I doubt it. Western progressivism is an apex political predator, much more so than old fashioned class consciousness. Spandrell's take on 'Bioleninism' vs 'Leninism' is good on this

>> No.12966463

>>12966333
this post is very poorly written, jesus christ. please tell me you altered your usual writing style or something

>> No.12966475

>>12966375
>did marx not describe the ideal society
No
>“Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence.”
-Marx, The German Ideology.

This quote has been reposted and used as a crutch so many times that I feel bad for doing it, but it really is the simplest answer to your post.

>> No.12966477

>>12966378
That bastard is pretty empty...

>> No.12966485

>>12966360
Marxists fail to predict the amazing self-innovations of capitalism.

They don't get that for every major company there's a bunch of MIT-trained scientists working 10 hours a day on how to make it more friendly from an ethical point of view, thus making people feel less guilty and better about themselves when buying their products.

Capitalism is based on competition, and competition drives innovation. Innovation is done by scientists who happen to be much smarter than Marxist humanities graduates and, therefore, are able to quickly circumvent the faults of capitalism which said Marxists like to criticize. Thus, we will soon have robots and such, and people might even receive a universal basic income that will let them live their lives very happily and without much effort (although the government should avoid the free-rider problem by making some requirements and so on) - all without needing any sort of revolution or revolt against the system. Our system works well, and can renovate itself when needed.

>> No.12966500

>>12966462
Ideology always appears as most unshakeable right before the beginning of its fall

>> No.12966502

>>12966463
Sorry. English is not my first language.

Keep in mind that I also wrote that post very fast, and therefore I may perhaps have used some overly Latinate syntax, or maybe other things of the sort.

>> No.12966505

>>12966485
yeah, capitalism seems to be much more scientific and can self correct than marxism, which seems to me like an utopia too rigid system.

>> No.12966523

>>12966485
They also don't get that people genuinely don't give a shit about ethics. That in a Godless universe the real consequence is petty sadism and lust for entropy crashes not any sort of solidarity and sympathy
People don't even want to win themselves, they take more glee in the thought of others losing

>> No.12966540

>>12966463
You're joking, right? His post is the best written post in this thread.

>> No.12966544

>>12966404
God if the left could just drop its insane demands for identity politics and its fetishisation of immigrants and anti-white culture or whatever so that they could come together with the right on this they would be a real force.

>> No.12966565

>>12966502
ignore my post, i didnt actually read yours. i just got the impression you had a fragile ego & that criticising your formatting would trigger you

>> No.12966572

>>12966565
based mind games anon

>> No.12966573

>>12966565
Based and assholepilled

>> No.12966581

>>12966485
>Ethical Capitalism
Zizek has an entire pieces on this. He actually talks about it all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpAMbpQ8J7g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzcfsq1_bt8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P18UK5IMRDI
The point isn't that they actually make the product ethically, the point is that all they have to do is give you the illusion moral superiority and then layer the unconformable stuff under layers and layers of "100% free trade ethically made assembled locally environmentally friendly recyclable label" bullshit

>> No.12966622

>>12966581
you only need to make an economic argument and make the ethical green solution more profitable than the old alternative.

again, not a real critique.

>> No.12966626
File: 74 KB, 960x874, workersalary.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12966626

>>12966505
>capitalism seems to be much more scientific and can self correct

>> No.12966646

>>12966622
Not a real solution.

>> No.12966653

>>12966626
this ignore supply and demand.

there's already workers making 350 as programmers on facebook.

get a better job.

>>12966646
yes, because circular economy and urban mining wasn't solutions capitalism made to the pollution issues.

>> No.12966662

>>12966581
I admit I have never really looked at the data, but as far as I can see, the richer the people get as a result of capitalism, the more they are alarmed by moral issues, and the more they strive to be good. This is actually a point that Peterson made during the debate, albeit very briefly. My impression is that capitalism today is a lot more ethical than it used to be.

Anyway, I am initially skeptical of your view, but I'll have to read more about it.

>> No.12966683

>>12966565
based as fuck

>> No.12966725

>>12966565
No problems, mate.

>> No.12966733

>>12966662
>capitalism today is a lot more ethical
For who? Where? Do we stop considering China's dealings in Africa as "capitalism"? Or what's happening at the US border? What about all the garbage-can factories with 14 year olds working 12 hour shifts for less-than-subsistence pay?

Just because (some, not all) first-worlders have a harder time coming into direct contact with the social antagonism, doesn't mean it's gone.

>> No.12966750

>>12966733
the alternative for such workers is to burn trash so they can harvest some gold and copper of it.

fuck off with muh factory job is like hell.

>> No.12966772

>>12966750
>>the alternative for such workers is to burn trash so they can harvest some gold and copper of it.
lmao what the fuck are you talking about? countless people do have that exact job under capitalism

>> No.12966777

>>12966750
do you not see the problem? the dilemma you present is between being worked so bad you're basically dying, or simply dying. And that's only in the factory example, it doesn't apply to the other things I mentioned.

>> No.12966794

>>12966772
>>12966777
chinese had such jobs until capitalism improved their situation where chinese wages are too expensive for those jobs so they send them to africa.

the alternative to those jobs is scraping garbage or primitive farming.

>> No.12966812

>>12966794
>chinese had such jobs until capitalism improved their situation
it's time to do some reading up on China's history on wikipedia

>> No.12966833

>>12966812
yeah, like mao starving to death millions of chinks because of retarded marxism?

>> No.12966838

>>12966833
>>12966812

>> No.12966857

>>12966794
Yes, and? Nobody is saying China was better off before capitalism. In fact, you could argue that capitalism in China as it exists right now exists only with the previous history of "communism" in china, and all the bloodshed and misery it took to transition out of the feudal system.

But capitalism in China today is STILL garbage. There are riots and strikes almost daily, which devolve into out-and-out fights with the police. People are poor as fuck even though the country is the fastest growing one in the history of growing. The social antagonism is strongest in China, precisely because of how ridiculously pronounced its capitalist development has been in the last 20 years. For Marxism, capitalist development and antagonism go hand-in-hand, and this contradiction at the center of the system is what creates the possibility of going past it.

>> No.12966858

>>12966838
so china not being a totalitarian shithole with social credit tied to your standarts of living not also designed by a communist party?

So china is not real comunism like Soviet russia, holodomor, Venezuela, Cuba, north korea, pol pot?

>> No.12966873

>>12966857
why they became capitalism after being commies with mao if capitalism sucks so much?

Is venezuela another fault of capitalism?

>> No.12966912

>>12966873
Because the revolution in China was, in potentia, capitalist all along, anon. Deng and Xi were just making explicit what was already implicit in the essence of Maoist China. It's not that they "decided" to become capitalism, but that they were led into it by social forces that they could not control. The same happened to the USSR.

>Venezuela
Venezuela wouldn't BE Venezuela if Chavez was not reacting to what he perceived as failures of capitalism. That is the whole point, the very possibility of "revolution" is implicit in capitalism itself and its functioning. Not that Chavismo or any such "national communisms" are any less reactionary, but they are a product of their context.

>> No.12966922

>>12966873
>why they became capitalism after being commies with mao if capitalism sucks so much
have you heard of tiananmen square

>> No.12966944

>>12966912
>>12966922
>physics make free energy imposible
>people still fall for free energy generators today
sounds like marxism, people keep falling for it even after it keeps failing so much.

marxism is literally a cult.

>> No.12966955

This felt off. On one hand, Zizek was clearly better-prepared and pointed out some shortcomings in Peterson's presentation, but also didn't push it to any meaningful extent. I think he did that on purpose of staying nice, and not without justification.
Surprisingly, Peterson was able to maneuver out of the 'show me the marxists' figure relatively well, considering the constraints.
The main topic was extremely bad and condemned the debate to its meme confinement. Neither participant said anything new and neither seemed willing to push it beyond the expected, surface level. Zizek could have said explicitly that people don't get marxism, while Peterson could ask Zizek to explain why is it they should try to understand marxism better. How does Zizek first praise Marx for his analysis beyond the Manifesto and then somehow get to the toilet jokes without outlining those alleged strengths? How doesn't Peterson push him on that more? Indeed, as far as Peterson is concerned, I think he simply wasn't prepared to cross-examine marxism or even ask Zizek for a sound dismissal of capitalism, which should have been the most basic direction one could take in his place.
The absolute loser though was the moderator who not only burnt himself with that intro that made Zizek cringe, but then also failed to keep the format and culminated this already lukewarm debate with the most anti-climatic question and timing imaginable. The cheering from the public, likewise, was quite distasteful.

>> No.12966961

>>12966944
Christianity was a cult when it started, now you come to /lit/ to defend its values against the new "cult".

>> No.12966980

>>12966961
I'm gnostic, faggot marxist.

>> No.12966988

>>12966980
I wonder why you're so against cults, then.

>> No.12966995

>>12966988
because at least capitalism is more scientific than marxism.

>> No.12967005

>>12966995
How can a system of living be "scientific"? Maybe we could talk about liberalism being "scientific", but capitalism? What does that mean? Getting wages instead of being a land-tied serf is more scientific? On what basis?

>> No.12967022

>>12967005
at least it tries to self correct when it crashes againts reality.

marxism is just assumed to be better because some faggot humanities professor think is better but end up with venezuela and holodomor and mao mass starvations.

>> No.12967090

>>12967022
>at least it tries to self correct when it crashes againts reality.
All systems do this. When Russia after revolution saw that they were lacking in provisions and faced pressure from peasants, they implemented market policies and traded with Western powers against their supposed principles. When Feudal lords felt their land was being threatened, they hired private armies or made deals with other lords. When Capitalists face crises of overproduction, or pressure from labor, they adjust the terms of the economy by devaluing capital. These things are all "rational" within the context of the system doing the self-correcting.

>> No.12967100

>>12967090
>they implemented market policies and traded with Western powers against their supposed principles.

so becoming capitalist is how marxism self correct with reality?

wow.

>> No.12967252

>>12964821
Zizek makes a film reference
> Jamie pull that up

>> No.12967270

>>12965083
> most red
Lol

>> No.12967380

>>12966225
try his movies
https://youtu.be/YJ897SCgsEY
https://youtu.be/G3xnfD7ZvE8

>> No.12967401

>>12966653
your solution is "there isnt a problem." meanwhile people with college degrees are working on starvation wages.

>> No.12967421

Where can I watch the debate?

>> No.12967453

Peterson just got exposed as a dilettante, and a poor one at that.

1) Anyone who has taken a 100 level course on Marx could have given as good or better of a rundown and critique of the Communist Manifesto that Peterson gave.
2) No serious Marxist reads the meme pamphlet Marx wrote for uneducated workers, it's not an academic source, it's a propaganda piece.
3) Peterson, although claiming to have read and understood at least a modicum of Zizek's works, was not able to produce a single meaningful critique of his theory, even going so far as to be impressed with Zizek's take on Christianity
3a) Peterson is in many ways a scholar of religion, in particular Judeo-Christianity; he also critiques Marxism for being an athiest doctrine which rejects these principles. So if Peterson had done so much as read Zizek's wikipedia article, let alone an article on him in an encyclopedia of philosophy, let alone read one of his books on Christianity, he would have known this position and not been impressed by it. It means he didn't even watch Pervert's Guide to Ideology. Incredible lack of research.
4) Peterson did not stick to his position that Marxism was bad, instead retreating to a simple repetition of his individualism (at one point admitting that the heart of the individualism leads to the position that you must do what is best for the community anyways "good enough for you/your family isn't enough" which basically recasts JP's position as individually enlightened Marxism)
5) Peterson hasn't read Critique of the Gotha program which is shorter than the Manifesto and much more important (reminder this intellectual has been arguing against the evils of Marx for decades and hasn't even read him in any meaningful sense since he was 18).
6) By the end, Peterson wasn't even able to formulate an argument against the form of Marxism which Zizek promotes. His only point to the debate which had any relevance was to point out Capitalism's productive force, a fact that he also admits Marx agrees with and discusses at length in the Manifesto.
7) Peterson being pressed on and subsequently not able to name a single postmodern neomarxist needs no explication.

Peterson has been exposed as someone who has no real education (or perhaps intellectual interest) in political theory. I am actually amazed there are people who watched this debate and think Peterson managed even the bare minimum of understanding of both Marxist theory and the historical realities of capitalist dynamics.

>> No.12967478

I'm not even a marxist or a commie, but zizek wrecked his shit.

>> No.12967583

>>12967453

On point 4 JP has actually been pretty consistent in arguing that radical individualism is narcissism if it has no purpose in a social context. He mentions in it his university video lectures, and most recently in his video with Stanley McChrystal
see with timestamp

https://youtu.be/_v-NfZ1j918?list=PL22J3VaeABQA_4uQfPdSEhiNhQM236_O-&t=2790

>> No.12967745
File: 49 KB, 601x960, hitormiss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12967745

>All these redditors in this thread
>Literally linking to reddit

Get out chapo faggots

>> No.12967770

>>12964790
If you listen to any of Peterson's critiques of communism it's clear that he's never read any communist authors.

>> No.12967875

>>12967770
It's even worse when he talks about Derrida.

>> No.12968254

>>12965003
props to dr. peterson for coming to a debate as a prominent marx critic where he was introduced to some marx ideas by a neurotic old man telling toilet jokes

>> No.12968575
File: 3.44 MB, 3472x3262, 1530410155184.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12968575

Finally, now I understand what philosophy is.

>> No.12968673

>>12964884
Could literally be achieved today. The barriers are ideological not material

>> No.12968692

>>12964775
https://www.strawpoll.me/17850950
https://www.strawpoll.me/17850950
https://www.strawpoll.me/17850950

>> No.12969655

>>12966857
Ye hahaha the revolution is historical inevitable this time for sure bros capitalism will collapse under it own contradictions any day now.