/lit/ - Literature

JOSÉ VASCONCELOS.

ask heidegger: he says himself
ask wittgenstein: he's too shy to say himself but you know he thinks it
ask whitehead: you realize whitehead has already anticipated this question and you already know that there neither is, nor is not, a greatest philosopher of the 20th century possible because you were whitehead this whole time. holy shit wtf
ask deleuze:

surely not a low iq nazi so you can eliminate heidegger. im sure even nietzsche would hate him he would think he was too morbid.

>>12916521

>>12916527
dumb frogposter

>>12916547
how can anybody hate frogposting?

>>12916521

FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE WOULD HAVE DESPISED MARTIN HEIDEGGER, AND EVERYTHING NATIONALSOCIALISTIC, BECAUSE FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE'S ETHOS WAS ANTITHETICAL TO THE ETHOS OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM; FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE WAS THE MORBID ONE —HE WAS MORBIDITY PERSONIFIED.


«ONE DAY[,] HILDA BROUGHT A BOOK TO THE TRAIN[,] WHICH I SIMPLY HAD TO READ[;] IT WAS NIETZSCHE'S ZARATHUSTRA[;] I IMMEDIATELY TRIED TO ABSORB THE ENTIRE WORK, BUT SOMETHING ABOUT IT STRUCK ME AS ALIEN[;] THAT WAS, AS I REALISED LATER, THE OVERLY PATHETIC, EVEN THEATRICAL[,] ELEMENT WHICH, TO ME, APPEARED WILFUL [SIC] RATHER THAN PERFECT[…]»

— ALFRED ROSENBERG, «MEMOIRS OF ALFRED ROSENBERG».

>>12916496
Nick Land
No contest.

>>12916596
shouting does not make your ideas any better

>>12916496
in terms of who has been the most influential out of these, probably Wittgenstein (in a direct sense) or Heidegger (in a more indirect sense)

>>12916650
>shouting

hi, patrick!

DELEUZE
ELEUZED
LEUZEDE
EUZEDEL
UZEDELE
ZEDELEU
EDELEUZ

I don't know the right answer, but i 100% know the wrong one: fucking Whitehead. Come on

>>12916691
t. brainlet

Tolkien

Wittgenstein said nothing original, like seriously, "words have no real meaning". No shit, more news at Cratylus home 2500 years ago.

Hitler vs Frankenstein vs Putin vs Kubrick

>>12916496
>pic unrelated

>>12916496
In continental phil, Heidegger. In analytic, Witty.

Deleuze is not a philosopher.

They were all prissy weirdos with weird (and often really fucked up) sexual interests who would say one thing and do another. It would be easier to say "list all the philosophers who are definitely not the best of the 20th century."

Spengler and Toynbee

>>12916596
>>12916521
retards

>>12916596

Hitler came closest to being the Ubermensch and living Nietzsche's philosophy though

>>12916669

Heidegger definitely had more influence than Wittgenstein.

>>12917032

EITHER YOU IGNORE EVERYTHING REGARDING ADOLF HITLER, OR YOU DO NOT COMPREHEND FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE'S ETHOS —OR BOTH.

>>12916687
looks cool but says gibberish

>>12916596
haha look at hitler's sloping mongoloid forehead

>>12917048
Dude you are right.

But stop screaming

>>12916496
>playing console wars with philosophers
an hero now, faggot

>>12917048
>>12916596
>tripfags

>>12916962
Deleuze is the philosophy king

Bertrand Russell

>>12916496
Certainly not Wittgenstein, that’s for sure.

>>12917454
unironically kys

not heidegger or wittgenstein. that nazi and the linguistic turn autist did fuck all for philosophy.

>>12916496
WHO WOULD WIN IN A FISTFIGHT: WITTGENSTEIN OR WITTGENSTEIN

>>12916596
Absolutely based
>>12917032
Absolutely cringe

it would have been better if it was whitehead that influenced postmodernism rather than that nazi midwit

>>12917034
in regards to the common man though, what is more likely to be holding a space in the public consciousness, the idea that for language, meaning=use, or some obscure ramblings about dasein. I could see the argument being made for Heidegger being more influential specifically within academic circles (continental at least), but to me, the test of a great philosopher is the gradual erosion of their academic ideas into commonly held notions that most people even in everyday life take for granted, i.e. pretty much all of Wittgenstein's thoughts on language.

>>12917837
you know how this ends

>>12918594
It's "Logisch Philosophische Abhandlungen" and "Philosophische Untersuchungen"
Get it right /lit/.

>>12916513
Damn I can't believe I'm starting to sympathise with a tripfag

Didn't read Wittgenstein, am I correct in assuming that his value is in showing how language renders many of the questions we pose instantly lose all hope of getting a meaningful answer? Anything else?

>>12916496
me

>>12917841

Bro my opinion is literally shared by Nietzsche scholars and academics you'd know that if you weren't a pseud

>>12916496
Sartre

>>12917048

I understand both fine you pseud turn off your caps lock you trog

>>12918377

The common man has no inkling regarding the meaning of words just as he has no qualms about the use of a hammer.

Heidegger's philosophy extends beyond just dasein.

>>12916496

>>12916496
McLuhan, Girard, Wittgenstein in that order

>>12919720
Mcluhan is just baby Deleuze

>>12916496
Late Peirce

>All men
hmmmmm

>>12917454
absolutely no

>>12916496
Still too ahead of time.