/lit/ - Literature

read none of them. women can't write

>>12912147
kys

>>12912062
1813
>Victorian female authors.jpg

>>12912147

>George
>Ellis
>women

>>12912062
I hated Pride & Prejudice, and even produced some heat on this very board by writing bad things about it.

But then I read Northanger Abbey and found it quite delightful, specially the second part, after the heroine goes to spent some time at the Abbey.

Middlemarch has the better canonical street cred, so if that influences your decisions at all (I must admit it does mine) I would start with middlemarch

Start with Wuthering Heights, which is a very short read, and then get ready for Middlemarch. P&P is no prority.

>>12913002
This is low quality bait

>>12912062
>by the author of
why?

>>12912062
>Which should I read first?
The first one you read.

>>12913026
>>12912062

>>12912062
Jane Eyre is the better Bronte. Then read The Tenant of Windfell Hall after it. In my headcannon I pretend that is the sequel; the marriage that followed the honeymoon.

>>12912062
Just read Wuthering Heights. Forget the other two, they're a meme.

>>12913002
Hahaha
Hahahaha
Hahahaha
>HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>12912147
How many books have you written that will be remembered in 200 years time, Anon?

>>12912062
Wuthering Hieghts, Emily seems like girlfriend material

>>12912062
Wuthering Heights should be read first simply because it's shorter.
After the Bronte appetizer jump into a work by George Eliot aka Mary Ann Evans.
>I like Danield Deronda over Middlemarch but hey there's always The Mill on the Floss.

>reading anything written by women
Damn that a yikes I tell ya!