[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 44 KB, 800x450, brainlettttt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12811234 No.12811234[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Post 'em

>Correlation does not imply causation

>> No.12811238

>>12811234
The more I read the less I know.

>> No.12811264

This Pynchon novel is great!

>> No.12811273

>>12811234
How is that a pseud quote? It's literally one of the most simple and fundamental truths of statistics.

>> No.12811277

>>12811273
Yeah but he got BTFO on an argument over it

>> No.12811278

>>12811273
It's one of the most used quotes do deny studies (i.e. truths) done on specific parts of a bigger pictures

>> No.12811282

>>12811277
more like deflected

>> No.12811283

>>12811278
Pretty sure it's used to tell retards to fuck off with their confirmation bias

>> No.12811286

>>12811282
Bring up a cogent point first, pseud.

>> No.12811303

>>12811283
literally the opposite, it furthers it
>>12811286
You produced an irrelevant reply in the first place

>> No.12811306

>>12811303
Stupid posts get irrelevant replies

>> No.12811312

>>12811303
>literally the opposite, it furthers it
'Tards gonna 'tard

>> No.12811318

>>12811273
That doesn't even make sense considering the widespread (false) idea according to which we only ever have access to the correlation between thinking and being, and never to either term considered apart from the other

>> No.12811321

>>12811318
Stay in school

>> No.12811329

>muh Dunning-Kruger effect
>as it may
>ergo
>ad hominem
>[another shitty informal made up fallacy translated to Latin for some reason]
>"can I get a source on that?" used in retarded contexts
>pop-psychology as a scientific worldview
>evolutionary psychology
>vulgar and selective empiricism only tactically deployed
>calls people incels
>blockchain
>hurr durr refute my retarded assertions
>anti-natalism
>thinks other people when talking about something have to use the kosher language that he prescribes and should control (e.g. Marxist-Leninists seething that people call intersectional feminists and the like "leftists" or "Marxists")
>le spectacle
>frogtwitter
>twitter-Catholicism
>"radical orthodoxy"
>[something something] "but ok"
>"umm sweety Kissinger is not a neocon sweety, he is PRAGMATIC!"
>showy Sufi-[Vedanta]-Islam and related topics (including Guenon and accolades)
>muh eastern philosophy "did it first"
>McBuddhism, mindfulness

>> No.12811330

>>12811321
He is right though.

>> No.12811333

>>12811312
It kills any decisive truths about a part of the whole. It basically means trying to finish a puzzle while you threw out some of the pieces.
>>12811306
Now THIS is a pseud quote.

>> No.12811335

>>12811330
How

>> No.12811341

>>12811333
Irony

The whole point is that you can't pull truth from simple correlation. It isn't done to shutter truth, it's too shutter shoddy logic that obscures truth. You just want to masturbate to pol infographics without feeling guilty

>> No.12811371

>>12811341
>The whole point is that you can't pull truth from simple correlation
No, the whole point is that if you deny a part of the truth, you deny all of it. And you are using a correlation as a buzzword, like everyone else when they use the quote.

>> No.12811377

>>12811371
Or maybe you're trying to use correlation as definite proof like the lazy seeker you are

>> No.12811387

>>12811377
Now that's fucking irony and laziness - to discredit a part of the whole and not study it further just because it doesn't show the other aspects, be they connected to the part or not.

Stop pseuding and start critically thinking.

>> No.12811388

>>12811321
correlation is the causation

>> No.12811389

>>12811387
That's not what that quote implies, retard.

>> No.12811399

>>12811389
It is used in this way retard, that's why I said it was a pseud quote in the first place.

>> No.12811410

>>12811399
Sounds like you're reading into it because someone shat all over your bullshit polemic once.

>> No.12811446

>>12811410
No, it was used all the time by a pseud friend that was a hypocrite concerning a debate about the influence of carbohydrates on physicality of humans. He said that carbs made people shorter (Asians) and when I said that they make people smarter then too (Just to fuck with his assumptions) and I proceeded to post articles that disproved him. Then, he immediately used the argument. That quote is low tier deflection used by brainlets to mask their bias, granted, I could have said the same about his height-carb correlation but I am a bit smarter to not tackle his arguments further.

The quote isn't bad in itself or false, it is just used by retards.

>> No.12811451

>>12811329
Peak pseud

>> No.12811457

>>12811446
Did you fuck?

>> No.12811462

>>12811329
you forgot
>muh strawman

>> No.12811472
File: 4 KB, 183x275, 1526374631476.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12811472

>correlation implies causation

>> No.12811486
File: 217 KB, 1296x1458, 1523352567011.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12811486

>>12811472
>capital is sentient

>> No.12811490

>>12811329
>single words
>quotes

>> No.12811493
File: 94 KB, 680x788, me.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12811493

>>12811234
>>12811472
>causation implies correlation

>> No.12811509
File: 37 KB, 396x596, 1547364547512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12811509

>using wojak macros
tip tip pseud

>> No.12811510
File: 55 KB, 448x684, JudeaPearl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12811510

>mfw brainlets don't know about rigorous statistical causation

>> No.12811511

>>12811509
>tarttposting
go back to nyc and get cucked by your polyamorous gf

>> No.12811514
File: 46 KB, 406x600, 1547311218016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12811514

>>12811511
u jelly?

>> No.12811518

>>12811514
no but post more of her tho

>> No.12811527

>>12811509
>>12811514
>mommy Tartt will never gently pat your head and tell you you're a good boy after you've whiffed and licked her sweaty feet which have been in leather boots and socks for 14 hours
that's disgusting though. i would never do such a thing haha

>> No.12811623
File: 13 KB, 474x266, quenn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12811623

>>12811527
>Anon, I...

>> No.12811680

>>12811329
>Marxists-leninists seething that people call intersectional feminists and the like “leftists” or “Marxists”
There’s a legitimate point to be made there though. Why continue to call them leftists when they’ve accommodated nearly every aspect of neoliberalism into their philosophy except for the emancipatory spirit of Marxism (which has simply become a tool for big business rather than people power). It’s a lazy and reductive gesture towards the historical development of leftist thought, rather than an nuanced understanding of where we are today and why the left has splintered so significantly.