[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 127 KB, 1280x720, superman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12806752 No.12806752 [Reply] [Original]

Do you plan on buying her book, /litl?

Here are a few parts of the article:

http://theconversation.com/why-we-need-a-new-philosophy-of-sex-112045

>A number of years ago, I found myself at a public sex beach in southern France for research purposes. Unsurprisingly, I experienced some ethical dilemmas. Because I was researching the ethics of sexuality, my research involved potentially having sex with men and women at the beach.

>The question of whether I “should” or “could” do so was complicated by a number of factors. I am a woman. I am queer. I am an academic. At the time, I was also in an (increasingly) difficult relationship with a man who was a philosopher. Given all of these complex factors, I desperately needed ethical assistance supported by philosophy (that I read and revered) that did not judge, and was aligned to my sexuality. But this philosophy – whichever way I turned to find it – doesn’t exist.

>These philosophies were not helpful for me in my ethical dilemmas, since they were not written for me, my body and my sexuality. Thankfully, in the world outside of philosophy, core assumptions about women’s sexuality are being dismantled.

Is it in a sense Nietzschean?

>> No.12806847

>>12806752
>Me want to have sex with everyone i want, betraying muh boyfriend and still be "ethically" supported.
Lmao, how pathetic, this is even worse than incels. Of course she wont find a solution, its almost as if she is trying to find a way to praise satan while being see as a nun and being afirmed.
>Is it in a sense Nietzschean?
Dont think so. She is still stuck on literal spooks. But it would be in my self interest to not help her understand that.

>> No.12806951
File: 481 KB, 500x321, 1551808159101.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12806951

>>12806752
>http://theconversation.com/why-we-need-a-new-philosophy-of-sex-112045
Jesus Crist just finished reading that shit. Its even worse than you make it out to be in the thread. The whole article is full of dumb stigmas.
These "women" are really desperate to justify their sexual preversions and still come out on top with back bones on morals n ethics. Thank god they are too dumb to justify it.

>> No.12807179

>>12806752
>I am a reluctant academic in the field of law and sexuality. My work is radically theoretical, as well as applied. I am interested in challenging sexual ethics (both institutional and personal) with participatory research. My book for Zero Books called Fucking Law: the search for her sexual ethics, is out in 2019.
Zero Books, of course!

>> No.12807218

>>12807179
Are they famous?

>> No.12807444
File: 44 KB, 600x325, gene-wilder.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12807444

>>12806752
>All of the names listed above are white men
Oh, so (((they))) count as white now? After a long history of persecution, now (((they))) are finally are on equal footing with white people, and then (((they))) suddenly become white?

It's almost like you just construct words to fit your narrative of white vs. Everyone else. That isn't going to turn out bad at all by dividing people and radicalising them! Btw subscribe to PewDiePie.

>> No.12807509

>>12806847
these women stop yelling once they reach 35 (max) and no one will pay for her obscenely high priced cost-per-orgasm dollar

>> No.12807656
File: 301 KB, 472x605, 1504867893691.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12807656

>>12806752
>Is it in a sense Nietzschean?
What? Creating a imperative moral system that tries to rule over everybody to justify as if your actions were for some greater cause, while treating people less as individuals but as racial stigmas like "white men"? That is the exact oposite of Nietz.

>> No.12808846

>>12807656
Isn't he all about creating your own value system?

>> No.12809040

>>12808846
More or less. But what she is trying to do is creating one that is supposed to be a "holy truth", and place it on others to follow her dumb shit. She doesnt know it, but what she is (trying) do is creating a spook, a fixed idea, that doesnt care about you but she imposes on you as a "greater good" and makes you follow it, like a religion or a cult. For me, it seems that the cause of all this is her need to validate her wicked sexual views and wanting to see other people do the same, so she thinks she can indeed find this holy truth that surpasses all other spooks just to validate her. Its just a preverted feminist pipe dream.