[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 179 KB, 750x424, spooks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12691058 No.12691058 [Reply] [Original]

Can Stirner's egoism be refuted?
And yeah, spooks are fun, but let's be a bit serious.

>> No.12691066

Can this cartoon character be refuted?

>> No.12691072

>>12691066
Are you spooked, anon?

>> No.12691078

>>12691072
What do you mean when you say “spooked?”

>> No.12691089

>>12691078
Spooked as a big spooky spook, so to speak

>> No.12691093
File: 29 KB, 665x574, 47b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12691093

>>12691058
Could one consider his thought technically a further-beyond of Descartes' cogito?

>> No.12691102

>>12691089
Alright, so you don’t even have a reference for what this cartoon character’s philosophy is, you just use his catchphrase (mistranslation by the way) to feel superior. Spook is no different than saying “redpilled.”
My suggestion would be to grow up (fucking idiot), but I genuinely doubt that’ll happen so just try not to harm anyone too bad with your Stirner’s Labratory fanclub.

>> No.12691299
File: 34 KB, 212x258, Max-Stirner 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12691299

>>12691058
ever hear of something called physiognomy?

>> No.12691301

>>12691102
He spooked

>> No.12691368

>>12691102
spook spook spook

>> No.12691383

Kant. Read critque of practical reason.

>> No.12691430

Didn't Marx do this like 100 years ago

>> No.12691485

>>12691383
>Can it be refuted?
>Can't
Damn right.

>> No.12691498

>>12691430
"No!"

>> No.12691533

>>12691430
Absolutely not, all leftshits do is "humanity" and "solidarity" spooks.

>> No.12691550

Is there a YT video summarizing Stirner's egoism? I don't "do" books.

>> No.12692184

>>12691533
Leftists also do Stirner.
Stirner also introduces the union of egoists.

>>12691550
Then why don’t you “do” yt searches and gtfo

>> No.12692272

>>12691430
His responce was mostly of him trying to correct his historical refences throughout the book but he didnt fully get his philosphy and didnt really tackle the subject. Marx just acted like a whinny bitch every time someone didnt fully align to his views

>> No.12692297

Yes, but nobody after Marx really cared about him except for some autistic edgy teenagers online far in the future, so why would anybody waste their time doing so.

>> No.12692318

Of course there's a way to refute him, which is what Marx did. E.g, meanwhile you say everything is a spook, capitalists own the world and squeeze their boot harder on everyone's head.

Knowing that, saying things are a spook is akin to the ostrich, sticking it's head in the ground, pretending the issues don't exist.

>> No.12692327

>>12692297
No. Certain anarchists, Emma Goldman for one, kept his memory alive. But like all things anarchist, these words get censored and hidden buy the reigning banality of the oligarchy. Which you give free service to with your ignorant slander.

>> No.12692339
File: 85 KB, 1080x1080, 1551454567864.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12692339

>>12692318
Please share with the room.