/lit/ - Literature

Middlemarch

>>12654834

I loved the Yellow Wallpaper. It's a great analysis of paranoia and mental illness as well.

I don't know if Roman fever can be considered explicitly feminist, but its related and still worth reading.

The Awakening is considered great by others and is certainly a classic. Still I found it insufferable and pointless. Kate Chopin has talent, but her work ultimately feels vapid and purposeless.

>>12654956
Can you tell me what parts make it a feminist work of literature?

>>12654834
this: http://therawness.com/AFP.pdf

>>12656060
feels like mra garbage f am. read like 30 pages.

>>12656389
Anon, if you don't take advice on relationships from anonymous virgins on the Internet, you are really weird

>implying

>>12656027
Marriage and the social status of women are major themes. Fyi, George Eliot was a woman.

>>12656027
it's like a thousand pages of strong intelligent women getting fucked over by the patriarchy

Women cannot see anything outside of their social lives. Everything they write is that. No grand ideas. Just social bullshit.

By further limiting the criteria to feminists, the dumbest bunch of faggots on earth, how in the name of tittyfucking christ do you expect anything good?

>>12654834