/lit/ - Literature

>>12652754

>>12652754
I’m reading Shaft in the Land of the Jews

>>12652754
Glad people are finally understanding the most important issue of the past 2000+ years

>>12652762
What a cute trap!

>>12652754
it's actually a good book not the poltard meme you'd believe it to be.

>>12652754
It's funny that this became the meme that it did because CoC is about as academic as an examination of the group selection tendencies of Jews can get.

I still want my English edition of 200 Years Together. Still not getting published. Really makes you think.

>>12652754
>People are reading it.
What's this meme?

Also, how credible is this book? Some reviews were saying "this is literally the second Elders of Zion, Nazi, etc.".

>>12653203
it's 100% accurate.
>b-b-but some people were kvetching about it
that's how you know it's good

It's an underrated gem. Very cool. Hopefully it can remain a secret on this board ;)

>>12652754
No they're not, Kevin. Stop trying already.

>>12652754
>People are reading it
That sentence brings me back to r/mde r/chadright, Summer 2018. God I miss those places

I tried reading this but it's more of an inside look at social sciences in the academy than anything. Kinda boring. If you're already hip to the JQ there's no reason to read.

>>12653222
>nostalgia for something less than a year old
I keep forgetting /lit/ is comprised of literal underage b&

>>12652754
>Jews are bad, mmmkay?
There, throw in a dash of vaguely Darwin-y words like "haplogroup" and you've read it.

>>12653222

>nostalgia for subreddits

You fucking disgust me

>>12652797
some swedish alt right web zine posted an english pdf a few months ago, if you make a thread on /pol/ someone might know the site

>>12653260
Ur funny

>>12652754
its a waste of time

>>12652754
Essential /lit/

>>12652762
fucking discord tranny counter-counter psy-op fucks

>>12652754
I heard about the book a month ago. It is an intresting view of the Jew, through the lens of evolutionary perspective that a group dont have too adapt via nature and become stronger or smarter. Instead the jews have developed a social stratergy of cooperation which is both monetary and political for the greater goal of survival of the tribe.
While this stratergy is not considered moral or ethical by our western standard it is there "culture" of survival

>>12654522
interesting

>>12652754
Jews sound like a real jerk.

>>12652754
A very good overview of the JQ. Once I had read it I started to look for critiques of it online and the sheer lack of any hard, direct critique of the content is astonishing. Of course there are plenty of knee-jerk calls of antisemitism which ignore all content from the book itself, but scholarly contesting of it is virtually nonexistent. Of the critiques that I did encounter I noticed a particular trend. The book can be thought of as describing two different aspects of the JQ - the actual descriptive parts that deal with the day-to-day behaviours of jewish organisations and individuals that push society towards certain ends. These are undeniable and demonstrable effects that HAVE happened and are continuing to happen and the main proponents of them are jewish (and certainly the political, social and economic agitation for them derives from jewish actors). Then there is the second part, the explanation as to WHY they act this way. This is obviously the less concrete section as behavioural/evolutionary/group psychology is a difficult subject to make definitive claims for as it is, much less for a particular subsection of humanity in a particular social sphere. Now, while I think there is some degree of validity to this argument, I myself have issue with some points here and there that I think could be explained better or are missing the point. However, the critiques online almost invariably focus on this aspect and try to tear it up, thinking that if they discredit the (much smaller and less significant) section of the book describing this theory, then all the previous points like the top-down social effects jews have had simply didn't happen. Total nonsense and purely done for obfuscation. The fact that nobody can truly refute any of the actual actions that jews are undertaking almost says far more than any book can.

People are reading it and that's a good thing.

>>12654857
oops, got carried away and forgot my pic to show I'm not just memeing

>>12653218
so much this

Why is it called The Culture of Critique? What does that mean?

>>12654857
The absolute state of /lit/ in 2019

>>12654876
Jews have a culture of critique.

People who liked MacDonald should also check out Werner Sombart's book on the Jews:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Sombart#Late_career_and_National_Socialism
https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/sombart/jews.pdf

>>12654857
Pretty good post anon.